突出环境铅污染对澳大利亚鹿类管理的风险

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Jordan O. Hampton, Jason S. Flesch, Alexander S. Wendt, Simon D. Toop
{"title":"突出环境铅污染对澳大利亚鹿类管理的风险","authors":"Jordan O. Hampton, Jason S. Flesch, Alexander S. Wendt, Simon D. Toop","doi":"10.1111/emr.12584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lead-based bullets used to shoot deer typically fragment. These toxic fragments are a threat to wildlife scavengers and human consumers of venison. Awareness of this issue is widespread internationally but limited in Australia. The aim of this research was to characterise deer carcass contamination via bullet fragmentation associated with lead-based and lead-free ammunition in a deer culling program conducted in Australia. We used radiography (X-rays) to study Hog Deer (<i>Axis porcinus</i>) shot in a professional ground-based shooting program in Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Our data captured 33 deer shot with frangible lead-based bullets in 2021, and 21 deer shot with monolithic lead-free (copper-based) bullets from the same rifles in 2021–2022. For lead-based bullets, the mean number of lead fragments per carcass ranged from seven to 629 (mean ± SD = 256 ± 169), mean fragment size was 1.2 mm<sup>2</sup> (74% of fragments were &lt;1.0 mm<sup>2</sup>) and the mean fragment coverage area (the smallest ellipse covering all fragments) was 325 cm<sup>2</sup>. Of these deer, 36% had metallic fragments in the ‘back strap’ (loin) muscles and 42% had metallic fragments in the shoulder muscles: meat cuts typically removed for human consumption. In contrast, for lead-free bullets, the mean number of metallic fragments per carcass ranged from zero to four (0.5 ± 1.0), with only 29% of carcasses having any fragments, and no deer had metallic fragments in the loin or shoulder muscles. On the basis of these results, it is clear that lead-based bullets used for shooting deer in Australia pose risks to wildlife scavengers, and to human consumers when used in hunting. Australian wildlife managers involved in mitigating deer impacts should strongly consider a timely transition to lead-free bullets.","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Highlighting the risk of environmental lead contamination for deer management in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Jordan O. Hampton, Jason S. Flesch, Alexander S. Wendt, Simon D. Toop\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emr.12584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lead-based bullets used to shoot deer typically fragment. These toxic fragments are a threat to wildlife scavengers and human consumers of venison. Awareness of this issue is widespread internationally but limited in Australia. The aim of this research was to characterise deer carcass contamination via bullet fragmentation associated with lead-based and lead-free ammunition in a deer culling program conducted in Australia. We used radiography (X-rays) to study Hog Deer (<i>Axis porcinus</i>) shot in a professional ground-based shooting program in Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Our data captured 33 deer shot with frangible lead-based bullets in 2021, and 21 deer shot with monolithic lead-free (copper-based) bullets from the same rifles in 2021–2022. For lead-based bullets, the mean number of lead fragments per carcass ranged from seven to 629 (mean ± SD = 256 ± 169), mean fragment size was 1.2 mm<sup>2</sup> (74% of fragments were &lt;1.0 mm<sup>2</sup>) and the mean fragment coverage area (the smallest ellipse covering all fragments) was 325 cm<sup>2</sup>. Of these deer, 36% had metallic fragments in the ‘back strap’ (loin) muscles and 42% had metallic fragments in the shoulder muscles: meat cuts typically removed for human consumption. In contrast, for lead-free bullets, the mean number of metallic fragments per carcass ranged from zero to four (0.5 ± 1.0), with only 29% of carcasses having any fragments, and no deer had metallic fragments in the loin or shoulder muscles. On the basis of these results, it is clear that lead-based bullets used for shooting deer in Australia pose risks to wildlife scavengers, and to human consumers when used in hunting. Australian wildlife managers involved in mitigating deer impacts should strongly consider a timely transition to lead-free bullets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12584\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于射杀鹿的铅制子弹通常会碎裂。这些有毒碎片对野生动物食腐动物和人类鹿肉消费者构成威胁。国际上对这一问题的认识很普遍,但在澳大利亚却很有限。本研究的目的是描述在澳大利亚实施的一项鹿捕杀计划中,与含铅和无铅弹药相关的子弹碎片对鹿尸体造成的污染。我们使用射线照相术(X 射线)对澳大利亚东南部维多利亚州一项专业地面射击项目中射杀的猪鹿(Axis porcinus)进行了研究。我们的数据记录了2021年使用易碎铅制子弹射杀的33头鹿,以及2021-2022年使用相同步枪的整体无铅(铜制)子弹射杀的21头鹿。就铅基子弹而言,每头鹿尸体的平均铅碎片数量从7到629不等(平均值± SD = 256 ± 169),平均碎片大小为1.2平方毫米(74%的碎片为1.0平方毫米),平均碎片覆盖面积(覆盖所有碎片的最小椭圆)为325平方厘米。在这些鹿中,36%的金属碎片位于 "背带"(腰部)肌肉中,42%的金属碎片位于肩部肌肉中,这些部位通常是为人类食用而切除的。相比之下,对于无铅子弹,每头鹿胴体上的金属碎片平均数量从 0 到 4(0.5 ± 1.0)不等,只有 29% 的鹿胴体上有金属碎片,而且没有一头鹿的腰部或肩部肌肉中有金属碎片。从这些结果来看,澳大利亚用于射杀鹿的铅制子弹显然会对野生动物食腐动物造成危害,在狩猎中使用时也会对人类消费者造成危害。参与减轻鹿所受影响的澳大利亚野生动物管理者应积极考虑及时过渡到使用无铅子弹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Highlighting the risk of environmental lead contamination for deer management in Australia
Lead-based bullets used to shoot deer typically fragment. These toxic fragments are a threat to wildlife scavengers and human consumers of venison. Awareness of this issue is widespread internationally but limited in Australia. The aim of this research was to characterise deer carcass contamination via bullet fragmentation associated with lead-based and lead-free ammunition in a deer culling program conducted in Australia. We used radiography (X-rays) to study Hog Deer (Axis porcinus) shot in a professional ground-based shooting program in Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Our data captured 33 deer shot with frangible lead-based bullets in 2021, and 21 deer shot with monolithic lead-free (copper-based) bullets from the same rifles in 2021–2022. For lead-based bullets, the mean number of lead fragments per carcass ranged from seven to 629 (mean ± SD = 256 ± 169), mean fragment size was 1.2 mm2 (74% of fragments were <1.0 mm2) and the mean fragment coverage area (the smallest ellipse covering all fragments) was 325 cm2. Of these deer, 36% had metallic fragments in the ‘back strap’ (loin) muscles and 42% had metallic fragments in the shoulder muscles: meat cuts typically removed for human consumption. In contrast, for lead-free bullets, the mean number of metallic fragments per carcass ranged from zero to four (0.5 ± 1.0), with only 29% of carcasses having any fragments, and no deer had metallic fragments in the loin or shoulder muscles. On the basis of these results, it is clear that lead-based bullets used for shooting deer in Australia pose risks to wildlife scavengers, and to human consumers when used in hunting. Australian wildlife managers involved in mitigating deer impacts should strongly consider a timely transition to lead-free bullets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信