中国稻田甲烷排放减缓措施荟萃分析

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ning Ma , Xiaojie Liu , Li Wang , Gang Liu
{"title":"中国稻田甲烷排放减缓措施荟萃分析","authors":"Ning Ma ,&nbsp;Xiaojie Liu ,&nbsp;Li Wang ,&nbsp;Gang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mitigating methane emissions from the rice paddy in China proves to be one of the most vital approaches to achieving the global methane reduction target, but the heterogeneity and effectiveness of existing methane reduction strategies and the influencing factors of their mitigation effects remain not systematically explored for China. We employed a meta-analysis to evaluate ten identified methane mitigation technologies in China, based on field experiments data. We show the methane mitigation effects vary in descending order, as water-fertilizer coupling management &gt; water management &gt; tillage management &gt; fertilizer management. In particular, the water-fertilizer coupling management could reach a reduction of 67.27 %, which is markedly higher than employing singular practices and eliminates the “trade-off” among individual reduction measures. Overall, the mitigation effects are subject to various factors, such as experimental year, soil pH, and precipitation, leading to varying effectiveness across regions. Intermittent irrigation and alternate wetting and drying irrigation have high abatement potential in southern China, while urea and variety yield better results in northern China. Although China's methane reduction efforts are at the forefront among Asian countries, the potentially exacerbating methane leakage issues due to its increasing import of rice from Southeast Asia deserve a special focus as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107379"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis on the mitigation measures of methane emissions in Chinese rice paddy\",\"authors\":\"Ning Ma ,&nbsp;Xiaojie Liu ,&nbsp;Li Wang ,&nbsp;Gang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Mitigating methane emissions from the rice paddy in China proves to be one of the most vital approaches to achieving the global methane reduction target, but the heterogeneity and effectiveness of existing methane reduction strategies and the influencing factors of their mitigation effects remain not systematically explored for China. We employed a meta-analysis to evaluate ten identified methane mitigation technologies in China, based on field experiments data. We show the methane mitigation effects vary in descending order, as water-fertilizer coupling management &gt; water management &gt; tillage management &gt; fertilizer management. In particular, the water-fertilizer coupling management could reach a reduction of 67.27 %, which is markedly higher than employing singular practices and eliminates the “trade-off” among individual reduction measures. Overall, the mitigation effects are subject to various factors, such as experimental year, soil pH, and precipitation, leading to varying effectiveness across regions. Intermittent irrigation and alternate wetting and drying irrigation have high abatement potential in southern China, while urea and variety yield better results in northern China. Although China's methane reduction efforts are at the forefront among Asian countries, the potentially exacerbating methane leakage issues due to its increasing import of rice from Southeast Asia deserve a special focus as well.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492300513X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492300513X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国稻田甲烷减排是实现全球甲烷减排目标的重要途径之一,但中国现有甲烷减排策略的异质性和有效性及其减排效果的影响因素尚未得到系统探讨。基于现场实验数据,我们采用元分析方法对中国确定的10种甲烷减排技术进行了评估。研究表明,水肥耦合管理对甲烷减排的影响从大到小依次变化;水管理>耕作管理;肥料管理。特别是水肥耦合管理可达到67.27%的减排效果,显著高于单一措施,消除了个别减排措施之间的“权衡”。总体而言,减缓效果受各种因素的影响,如试验年份、土壤pH值和降水,导致不同区域的效果不同。间歇灌溉和干湿交替灌溉在中国南方具有较高的治理潜力,而尿素和品种在中国北方具有较好的治理效果。虽然中国在减少甲烷排放方面的努力在亚洲国家中走在前列,但由于中国从东南亚进口大米的增加,可能加剧甲烷泄漏问题也值得特别关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A meta-analysis on the mitigation measures of methane emissions in Chinese rice paddy

A meta-analysis on the mitigation measures of methane emissions in Chinese rice paddy

A meta-analysis on the mitigation measures of methane emissions in Chinese rice paddy

Mitigating methane emissions from the rice paddy in China proves to be one of the most vital approaches to achieving the global methane reduction target, but the heterogeneity and effectiveness of existing methane reduction strategies and the influencing factors of their mitigation effects remain not systematically explored for China. We employed a meta-analysis to evaluate ten identified methane mitigation technologies in China, based on field experiments data. We show the methane mitigation effects vary in descending order, as water-fertilizer coupling management > water management > tillage management > fertilizer management. In particular, the water-fertilizer coupling management could reach a reduction of 67.27 %, which is markedly higher than employing singular practices and eliminates the “trade-off” among individual reduction measures. Overall, the mitigation effects are subject to various factors, such as experimental year, soil pH, and precipitation, leading to varying effectiveness across regions. Intermittent irrigation and alternate wetting and drying irrigation have high abatement potential in southern China, while urea and variety yield better results in northern China. Although China's methane reduction efforts are at the forefront among Asian countries, the potentially exacerbating methane leakage issues due to its increasing import of rice from Southeast Asia deserve a special focus as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信