肉鸡坏死性肠炎和无抗生素生产:测试和使用替代产品的挑战

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Robert J. Moore
{"title":"肉鸡坏死性肠炎和无抗生素生产:测试和使用替代产品的挑战","authors":"Robert J. Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.aninu.2023.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The global trend towards raising broiler chickens without the use of in-feed antibiotics (IFAs) means that there is an ongoing need to develop alternative treatments capable of delivering the benefits that IFAs previously provided. IFAs supported the productivity performance of chickens and played a key role in maintaining their health. Necrotic enteritis (NE) is an important disease of broilers that affects health, productivity, and welfare, and was previously well controlled by IFAs. However, with the reduction in IFA use, NE is resurgent in some countries. Vaccines and various feed additives, including pre-, pro-, and postbiotics, phytobiotics, fatty acids, and phage therapies have been introduced as alternative methods of NE control. While some of these feed additives have specific activity against the NE pathogen, <em>Clostridium perfringens</em>, most have the more general goal of reinforcing gut health. Extensive reviews of the effects of many of these feed additives on gut health have been published recently. Hence, rather than cover previously well reviewed areas of research this review focuses on the challenges and pitfalls in undertaking experimental assessment of alternative NE treatments and translating laboratory research to real world commercial production settings. The review is based on the author’s particular experience, reading, thoughts, and analysis of the available information and inevitably presents a particular understanding that is likely to be at odds with others thinking on these issues. It is put forward to stimulate thinking and discussion on the issues covered.</p>","PeriodicalId":8184,"journal":{"name":"Animal Nutrition","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Necrotic enteritis and antibiotic-free production of broiler chickens: Challenges in testing and using alternative products\",\"authors\":\"Robert J. Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aninu.2023.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The global trend towards raising broiler chickens without the use of in-feed antibiotics (IFAs) means that there is an ongoing need to develop alternative treatments capable of delivering the benefits that IFAs previously provided. IFAs supported the productivity performance of chickens and played a key role in maintaining their health. Necrotic enteritis (NE) is an important disease of broilers that affects health, productivity, and welfare, and was previously well controlled by IFAs. However, with the reduction in IFA use, NE is resurgent in some countries. Vaccines and various feed additives, including pre-, pro-, and postbiotics, phytobiotics, fatty acids, and phage therapies have been introduced as alternative methods of NE control. While some of these feed additives have specific activity against the NE pathogen, <em>Clostridium perfringens</em>, most have the more general goal of reinforcing gut health. Extensive reviews of the effects of many of these feed additives on gut health have been published recently. Hence, rather than cover previously well reviewed areas of research this review focuses on the challenges and pitfalls in undertaking experimental assessment of alternative NE treatments and translating laboratory research to real world commercial production settings. The review is based on the author’s particular experience, reading, thoughts, and analysis of the available information and inevitably presents a particular understanding that is likely to be at odds with others thinking on these issues. It is put forward to stimulate thinking and discussion on the issues covered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2023.08.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2023.08.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球饲养肉鸡的趋势是不使用饲料中抗生素(IFAs),这意味着持续需要开发能够提供IFAs以前提供的益处的替代治疗方法。IFAs支持鸡的生产性能,并在保持其健康方面发挥关键作用。坏死性肠炎(NE)是影响肉鸡健康、生产力和福利的重要疾病,以前通过IFAs可以很好地控制。然而,随着IFA使用的减少,NE在一些国家重新兴起。疫苗和各种饲料添加剂,包括生物前、生物前和生物后、植物制剂、脂肪酸和噬菌体疗法,已被引入作为控制新冠病毒的替代方法。虽然其中一些饲料添加剂对NE病原体产气荚膜梭菌具有特定活性,但大多数饲料添加剂具有增强肠道健康的更普遍目标。最近发表了大量关于这些饲料添加剂对肠道健康影响的综述。因此,这篇综述并没有涵盖之前经过充分审查的研究领域,而是侧重于对替代NE治疗进行实验评估以及将实验室研究转化为现实世界的商业生产环境中的挑战和陷阱。这篇评论是基于作者的特定经验、阅读、想法和对现有信息的分析,不可避免地呈现出一种可能与他人在这些问题上的想法不一致的特定理解。提出来是为了激发对所涉问题的思考和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Necrotic enteritis and antibiotic-free production of broiler chickens: Challenges in testing and using alternative products

The global trend towards raising broiler chickens without the use of in-feed antibiotics (IFAs) means that there is an ongoing need to develop alternative treatments capable of delivering the benefits that IFAs previously provided. IFAs supported the productivity performance of chickens and played a key role in maintaining their health. Necrotic enteritis (NE) is an important disease of broilers that affects health, productivity, and welfare, and was previously well controlled by IFAs. However, with the reduction in IFA use, NE is resurgent in some countries. Vaccines and various feed additives, including pre-, pro-, and postbiotics, phytobiotics, fatty acids, and phage therapies have been introduced as alternative methods of NE control. While some of these feed additives have specific activity against the NE pathogen, Clostridium perfringens, most have the more general goal of reinforcing gut health. Extensive reviews of the effects of many of these feed additives on gut health have been published recently. Hence, rather than cover previously well reviewed areas of research this review focuses on the challenges and pitfalls in undertaking experimental assessment of alternative NE treatments and translating laboratory research to real world commercial production settings. The review is based on the author’s particular experience, reading, thoughts, and analysis of the available information and inevitably presents a particular understanding that is likely to be at odds with others thinking on these issues. It is put forward to stimulate thinking and discussion on the issues covered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Nutrition
Animal Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Nutrition encompasses the full gamut of animal nutritional sciences and reviews including, but not limited to, fundamental aspects of animal nutrition such as nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics and molecular and cell biology related to nutrition, and more applied aspects of animal nutrition, such as raw material evaluation, feed additives, nutritive value of novel ingredients and feed safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信