从法律上承认生殖胁迫，同时质疑性暴力例外论

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1017/jme.2023.104

Jane Stoever

{"title":"从法律上承认生殖胁迫，同时质疑性暴力例外论","authors":"Jane Stoever","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While sexual violence should not be the prerequisite for legal abortion, expanding definitions of abuse to include reproductive coercion can open avenues of access to abortion following the Dobbs decision. Understanding the increased danger and compounding challenges of intimate partner violence can inform legislative initiatives, healthcare responses, and movements for reproductive justice.","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legally Recognizing Reproductive Coercion while Questioning Sexual Violence Exceptionalism\",\"authors\":\"Jane Stoever\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jme.2023.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While sexual violence should not be the prerequisite for legal abortion, expanding definitions of abuse to include reproductive coercion can open avenues of access to abortion following the Dobbs decision. Understanding the increased danger and compounding challenges of intimate partner violence can inform legislative initiatives, healthcare responses, and movements for reproductive justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然性暴力不应成为合法堕胎的先决条件，但在多布斯案判决之后，将虐待的定义扩大到包括生殖强迫，可以开辟堕胎的途径。了解亲密伴侣暴力行为日益增加的危险和日益复杂的挑战，可以为立法举措、保健对策和生殖正义运动提供信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Legally Recognizing Reproductive Coercion while Questioning Sexual Violence Exceptionalism

While sexual violence should not be the prerequisite for legal abortion, expanding definitions of abuse to include reproductive coercion can open avenues of access to abortion following the Dobbs decision. Understanding the increased danger and compounding challenges of intimate partner violence can inform legislative initiatives, healthcare responses, and movements for reproductive justice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics

自引率

0.00%

发文量