利用现有工具：利用《海德修正案》保护最低限度的堕胎机会并减轻限制性州的危害

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1017/jme.2023.92

Fabiola Carrión, Lee Hasselbacher, Terri-Ann Thompson

{"title":"利用现有工具：利用《海德修正案》保护最低限度的堕胎机会并减轻限制性州的危害","authors":"Fabiola Carrión, Lee Hasselbacher, Terri-Ann Thompson","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overturn of Roe v. Wade has resulted in fewer rights and resources for people seeking abortion care, particularly in the South. The Hyde Amendment has historically restricted abortion access for those enrolled in Medicaid. We argue here that its guarantees of minimum abortion coverage should be leveraged to offset harms where possible.","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"235 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging the Tools Available: Using the Hyde Amendment to Preserve Minimum Abortion Access and Mitigate Harms in Restrictive States\",\"authors\":\"Fabiola Carrión, Lee Hasselbacher, Terri-Ann Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jme.2023.92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The overturn of Roe v. Wade has resulted in fewer rights and resources for people seeking abortion care, particularly in the South. The Hyde Amendment has historically restricted abortion access for those enrolled in Medicaid. We argue here that its guarantees of minimum abortion coverage should be leveraged to offset harms where possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

罗伊诉韦德案的推翻导致寻求堕胎护理的人的权利和资源减少，特别是在南方。海德修正案历来限制参加医疗补助计划的人堕胎。我们在此认为，它对最低限度堕胎覆盖率的保证应该在可能的情况下抵消危害。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Leveraging the Tools Available: Using the Hyde Amendment to Preserve Minimum Abortion Access and Mitigate Harms in Restrictive States

The overturn of Roe v. Wade has resulted in fewer rights and resources for people seeking abortion care, particularly in the South. The Hyde Amendment has historically restricted abortion access for those enrolled in Medicaid. We argue here that its guarantees of minimum abortion coverage should be leveraged to offset harms where possible.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics

自引率

0.00%

发文量