Gerben A. van Kleef, Maybritt Larsen, Eftychia Stamkou
{"title":"音乐教师的情感表达如何影响学生的表现:\"音色决定音乐\"。","authors":"Gerben A. van Kleef, Maybritt Larsen, Eftychia Stamkou","doi":"10.1007/s11031-023-10051-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Teachers, parents, and other feedback providers commonly express positive emotions to stimulate learning. When students’ performance is below expectations, however, feedback providers may be inclined to express negative emotions. How these different emotional styles shape students’ development remains poorly understood. Here we investigate the effects of music teachers’ positive versus negative emotional expressions on their students’ musical performance. We draw on emotions as social information (EASI) theory, which postulates that the effects of emotional expressions depend on targets’ information-processing motivation (which determines whether feedback is extracted from emotional expressions) and agreeableness (which determines the perceived appropriateness of positive vs. negative expressions). We followed music teachers and students during regular learning sessions. One week before the sessions, we assessed students’ dispositional information-processing motivation and agreeableness. Immediately after the sessions, students reported on their teachers’ emotional expressions during the session, and teachers rated the performance of students on two musical tasks. An outside expert evaluated recordings of a subset of these performances. Consistent with the EASI framework, students who were confronted with stronger positive emotional expressions of their teachers performed better to the extent that they were lower on information-processing motivation and higher on agreeableness. Conversely, students who were confronted with stronger negative emotional expressions performed better to the degree that they were higher on information-processing motivation and lower on agreeableness. These findings indicate that both positive and negative emotional expressions of teachers can benefit students’ performance, depending on the student’s personality. We discuss implications for feedback, emotions and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":48282,"journal":{"name":"Motivation and Emotion","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How music teachers’ emotional expressions shape students’ performance: “C’est le ton qui fait la musique”\",\"authors\":\"Gerben A. van Kleef, Maybritt Larsen, Eftychia Stamkou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11031-023-10051-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Teachers, parents, and other feedback providers commonly express positive emotions to stimulate learning. When students’ performance is below expectations, however, feedback providers may be inclined to express negative emotions. How these different emotional styles shape students’ development remains poorly understood. Here we investigate the effects of music teachers’ positive versus negative emotional expressions on their students’ musical performance. We draw on emotions as social information (EASI) theory, which postulates that the effects of emotional expressions depend on targets’ information-processing motivation (which determines whether feedback is extracted from emotional expressions) and agreeableness (which determines the perceived appropriateness of positive vs. negative expressions). We followed music teachers and students during regular learning sessions. One week before the sessions, we assessed students’ dispositional information-processing motivation and agreeableness. Immediately after the sessions, students reported on their teachers’ emotional expressions during the session, and teachers rated the performance of students on two musical tasks. An outside expert evaluated recordings of a subset of these performances. Consistent with the EASI framework, students who were confronted with stronger positive emotional expressions of their teachers performed better to the extent that they were lower on information-processing motivation and higher on agreeableness. Conversely, students who were confronted with stronger negative emotional expressions performed better to the degree that they were higher on information-processing motivation and lower on agreeableness. These findings indicate that both positive and negative emotional expressions of teachers can benefit students’ performance, depending on the student’s personality. We discuss implications for feedback, emotions and education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Motivation and Emotion\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Motivation and Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10051-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motivation and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10051-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
How music teachers’ emotional expressions shape students’ performance: “C’est le ton qui fait la musique”
Teachers, parents, and other feedback providers commonly express positive emotions to stimulate learning. When students’ performance is below expectations, however, feedback providers may be inclined to express negative emotions. How these different emotional styles shape students’ development remains poorly understood. Here we investigate the effects of music teachers’ positive versus negative emotional expressions on their students’ musical performance. We draw on emotions as social information (EASI) theory, which postulates that the effects of emotional expressions depend on targets’ information-processing motivation (which determines whether feedback is extracted from emotional expressions) and agreeableness (which determines the perceived appropriateness of positive vs. negative expressions). We followed music teachers and students during regular learning sessions. One week before the sessions, we assessed students’ dispositional information-processing motivation and agreeableness. Immediately after the sessions, students reported on their teachers’ emotional expressions during the session, and teachers rated the performance of students on two musical tasks. An outside expert evaluated recordings of a subset of these performances. Consistent with the EASI framework, students who were confronted with stronger positive emotional expressions of their teachers performed better to the extent that they were lower on information-processing motivation and higher on agreeableness. Conversely, students who were confronted with stronger negative emotional expressions performed better to the degree that they were higher on information-processing motivation and lower on agreeableness. These findings indicate that both positive and negative emotional expressions of teachers can benefit students’ performance, depending on the student’s personality. We discuss implications for feedback, emotions and education.
期刊介绍:
Motivation and Emotion publishes articles on human motivational and emotional phenomena that make theoretical advances by linking empirical findings to underlying processes. Submissions should focus on key problems in motivation and emotion, and, if using non-human participants, should contribute to theories concerning human behavior. Articles should be explanatory rather than merely descriptive, providing the data necessary to understand the origins of motivation and emotion, to explicate why, how, and under what conditions motivational and emotional states change, and to document that these processes are important to human functioning.A range of methodological approaches are welcome, with methodological rigor as the key criterion. Manuscripts that rely exclusively on self-report data are appropriate, but published articles tend to be those that rely on objective measures (e.g., behavioral observations, psychophysiological responses, reaction times, brain activity, and performance or achievement indicators) either singly or combination with self-report data.The journal generally does not publish scale development and validation articles. However, it is open to articles that focus on the post-validation contribution that a new measure can make. Scale development and validation work therefore may be submitted if it is used as a necessary prerequisite to follow-up studies that demonstrate the importance of the new scale in making a theoretical advance.