将绩效管理系统作为组织有效性的预测因素进行研究:印度制造业的视角

Q3 Engineering
Mr. K. K. Bajaj
{"title":"将绩效管理系统作为组织有效性的预测因素进行研究:印度制造业的视角","authors":"Mr. K. K. Bajaj","doi":"10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i5.2669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regular and systematic assessment of performance is a crucial responsibility for management. It not only evaluates and monitors organizational growth but also provides career direction for individual employees. Establishing clear performance expectations, encompassing results, actions, and behaviors, helps employees understand their job requirements. Well-defined goals, coupled with regular performance assessments, are vital for defining corporate competencies and identifying skill gaps. This information serves as a valuable input for designing Human Resource Development (HRD) plans. \nDespite the importance of performance appraisal systems, there is often a gap between intention and actual practice in many organizations. Previous research in Indian organizations revealed that existing performance management systems (PMSs) may allow for the use of appraisal data for administrative purposes, but there is a missing link between appraisal outcomes and the subsequent design and execution of developmental programs. \nIn light of this, researchers aimed to assess employees' perceptions of PMS and its role in achieving organizational effectiveness. A survey, including a questionnaire and focused group discussions, was conducted with a purposive sample of 200 professionals in Indian manufacturing industries. The analysis confirmed the association between PMS and organizational effectiveness. However, there were differing perceptions among line managers about PMS, and even when there was agreement, it did not lead to superior outcomes due to a lack of clarity in the existing system. \nThe discussions highlighted a distinct differentiation in the involvement of different levels of management in the performance appraisal mechanism. Additionally, the reciprocal trigonometric relationship between PMS, competency management systems, and training and development was emphasized.","PeriodicalId":39883,"journal":{"name":"推进技术","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Performance Management System as a Predictor of Organizational Effectiveness: Perspectives from the Indian Manufacturing Sector\",\"authors\":\"Mr. K. K. Bajaj\",\"doi\":\"10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i5.2669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regular and systematic assessment of performance is a crucial responsibility for management. It not only evaluates and monitors organizational growth but also provides career direction for individual employees. Establishing clear performance expectations, encompassing results, actions, and behaviors, helps employees understand their job requirements. Well-defined goals, coupled with regular performance assessments, are vital for defining corporate competencies and identifying skill gaps. This information serves as a valuable input for designing Human Resource Development (HRD) plans. \\nDespite the importance of performance appraisal systems, there is often a gap between intention and actual practice in many organizations. Previous research in Indian organizations revealed that existing performance management systems (PMSs) may allow for the use of appraisal data for administrative purposes, but there is a missing link between appraisal outcomes and the subsequent design and execution of developmental programs. \\nIn light of this, researchers aimed to assess employees' perceptions of PMS and its role in achieving organizational effectiveness. A survey, including a questionnaire and focused group discussions, was conducted with a purposive sample of 200 professionals in Indian manufacturing industries. The analysis confirmed the association between PMS and organizational effectiveness. However, there were differing perceptions among line managers about PMS, and even when there was agreement, it did not lead to superior outcomes due to a lack of clarity in the existing system. \\nThe discussions highlighted a distinct differentiation in the involvement of different levels of management in the performance appraisal mechanism. Additionally, the reciprocal trigonometric relationship between PMS, competency management systems, and training and development was emphasized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"推进技术\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"推进技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i5.2669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"推进技术","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i5.2669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定期和系统的绩效评估是管理层的一项重要责任。它不仅评估和监控组织的发展,还为员工个人提供职业发展方向。建立明确的绩效预期,包括结果、行动和行为,有助于员工理解他们的工作要求。明确的目标,加上定期的绩效评估,对于定义企业能力和识别技能差距至关重要。这些信息是设计人力资源开发(HRD)计划的宝贵输入。尽管绩效评估系统很重要,但在许多组织中,意图和实际做法之间往往存在差距。先前对印度组织的研究表明,现有的绩效管理系统(pms)可能允许将评估数据用于行政目的,但评估结果与随后的发展计划的设计和执行之间缺少联系。鉴于此,研究人员旨在评估员工对经前症候群的看法及其在实现组织有效性方面的作用。一项调查,包括问卷调查和重点小组讨论,对印度制造业的200名专业人员进行了有目的的抽样。分析证实了PMS与组织有效性之间的关联。然而,部门经理对PMS有不同的看法,即使有一致意见,由于现有系统缺乏明确性,它也不会导致更好的结果。讨论突出了不同级别的管理人员参与考绩机制的明显差别。此外,还强调了PMS、胜任力管理系统和培训与发展之间的三角关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Performance Management System as a Predictor of Organizational Effectiveness: Perspectives from the Indian Manufacturing Sector
Regular and systematic assessment of performance is a crucial responsibility for management. It not only evaluates and monitors organizational growth but also provides career direction for individual employees. Establishing clear performance expectations, encompassing results, actions, and behaviors, helps employees understand their job requirements. Well-defined goals, coupled with regular performance assessments, are vital for defining corporate competencies and identifying skill gaps. This information serves as a valuable input for designing Human Resource Development (HRD) plans. Despite the importance of performance appraisal systems, there is often a gap between intention and actual practice in many organizations. Previous research in Indian organizations revealed that existing performance management systems (PMSs) may allow for the use of appraisal data for administrative purposes, but there is a missing link between appraisal outcomes and the subsequent design and execution of developmental programs. In light of this, researchers aimed to assess employees' perceptions of PMS and its role in achieving organizational effectiveness. A survey, including a questionnaire and focused group discussions, was conducted with a purposive sample of 200 professionals in Indian manufacturing industries. The analysis confirmed the association between PMS and organizational effectiveness. However, there were differing perceptions among line managers about PMS, and even when there was agreement, it did not lead to superior outcomes due to a lack of clarity in the existing system. The discussions highlighted a distinct differentiation in the involvement of different levels of management in the performance appraisal mechanism. Additionally, the reciprocal trigonometric relationship between PMS, competency management systems, and training and development was emphasized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
推进技术
推进技术 Engineering-Aerospace Engineering
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6610
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信