Madhurika Kate, K. V. Kumar, Akshatha Nayak, Arun Shirali
{"title":"比较分散练习和集中练习对急性中风患者功能恢复和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)的影响","authors":"Madhurika Kate, K. V. Kumar, Akshatha Nayak, Arun Shirali","doi":"10.25259/jnrp_416_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nGlobally, stroke is known to be one of the major health problems, resulting in disability among an aging population. Rehabilitation is a process of re-learning of skills, lost due to brain injury. Many factors influence motor learning post neurological insult and practice is one of the key factors which influence relearning or reacquisition of lost motor skills. Practice can be varied concerning order (blocked or random), scheduling (massed or distributed), or whole and part practice. The study observed the effect of variations in practice schedules on motor and functional recovery.\n\n\n\nThirty-two acute stroke subjects were recruited and equally divided into two groups (16 in massed and 16 in distributed). Both groups received an accelerated skill acquisition program (ASAP) for six sessions a week for 2 weeks. Pre- and post-outcome measures included stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) for motor recovery, modified Barthel index (MBI) for functional recovery, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) for neuroplasticity.\n\n\n\nThe median scores of participants in the massed practice group before the intervention, of STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 23.5, 19, and 0.65, respectively, whereas post values of STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 40.5, 60.5, and 0.75, respectively. The median scores of the distributed practice group of the pre-STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 23.5, 6.5, and 0.70, respectively, whereas the post-STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 41, 45.5, and 0.80, respectively. P-value was reported to be <0.05 while comparing pre- and post-values of STREAM, MBI, and BDNF within both intervention groups. The median change scores of STREAM, MBI, and BDNF reported P ≥ 0.05 when compared between the groups.\n\n\n\nBoth the groups had significant recovery post-intervention designed based on ASAP, about impairment mitigation, pursuing skilled movement leading to significant functional gains. Appropriate timing along with optimal dosage became an active ingredient in functional recovery in acute stroke subjects. The distributed practice might have added effect of spacing, resulting in easier learning and accuracy of skills. The study reveals that distributed practice can be part of regular clinical practice to enhance functional recovery in acute stroke rehabilitation.\n","PeriodicalId":16443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing distributed versus massed practice on functional recovery and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in acute stroke subjects\",\"authors\":\"Madhurika Kate, K. V. Kumar, Akshatha Nayak, Arun Shirali\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/jnrp_416_2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nGlobally, stroke is known to be one of the major health problems, resulting in disability among an aging population. Rehabilitation is a process of re-learning of skills, lost due to brain injury. Many factors influence motor learning post neurological insult and practice is one of the key factors which influence relearning or reacquisition of lost motor skills. Practice can be varied concerning order (blocked or random), scheduling (massed or distributed), or whole and part practice. The study observed the effect of variations in practice schedules on motor and functional recovery.\\n\\n\\n\\nThirty-two acute stroke subjects were recruited and equally divided into two groups (16 in massed and 16 in distributed). Both groups received an accelerated skill acquisition program (ASAP) for six sessions a week for 2 weeks. Pre- and post-outcome measures included stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) for motor recovery, modified Barthel index (MBI) for functional recovery, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) for neuroplasticity.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe median scores of participants in the massed practice group before the intervention, of STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 23.5, 19, and 0.65, respectively, whereas post values of STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 40.5, 60.5, and 0.75, respectively. The median scores of the distributed practice group of the pre-STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 23.5, 6.5, and 0.70, respectively, whereas the post-STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 41, 45.5, and 0.80, respectively. P-value was reported to be <0.05 while comparing pre- and post-values of STREAM, MBI, and BDNF within both intervention groups. The median change scores of STREAM, MBI, and BDNF reported P ≥ 0.05 when compared between the groups.\\n\\n\\n\\nBoth the groups had significant recovery post-intervention designed based on ASAP, about impairment mitigation, pursuing skilled movement leading to significant functional gains. Appropriate timing along with optimal dosage became an active ingredient in functional recovery in acute stroke subjects. The distributed practice might have added effect of spacing, resulting in easier learning and accuracy of skills. The study reveals that distributed practice can be part of regular clinical practice to enhance functional recovery in acute stroke rehabilitation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_416_2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_416_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing distributed versus massed practice on functional recovery and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in acute stroke subjects
Globally, stroke is known to be one of the major health problems, resulting in disability among an aging population. Rehabilitation is a process of re-learning of skills, lost due to brain injury. Many factors influence motor learning post neurological insult and practice is one of the key factors which influence relearning or reacquisition of lost motor skills. Practice can be varied concerning order (blocked or random), scheduling (massed or distributed), or whole and part practice. The study observed the effect of variations in practice schedules on motor and functional recovery.
Thirty-two acute stroke subjects were recruited and equally divided into two groups (16 in massed and 16 in distributed). Both groups received an accelerated skill acquisition program (ASAP) for six sessions a week for 2 weeks. Pre- and post-outcome measures included stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) for motor recovery, modified Barthel index (MBI) for functional recovery, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) for neuroplasticity.
The median scores of participants in the massed practice group before the intervention, of STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 23.5, 19, and 0.65, respectively, whereas post values of STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 40.5, 60.5, and 0.75, respectively. The median scores of the distributed practice group of the pre-STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 23.5, 6.5, and 0.70, respectively, whereas the post-STREAM total, MBI, and BDNF were 41, 45.5, and 0.80, respectively. P-value was reported to be <0.05 while comparing pre- and post-values of STREAM, MBI, and BDNF within both intervention groups. The median change scores of STREAM, MBI, and BDNF reported P ≥ 0.05 when compared between the groups.
Both the groups had significant recovery post-intervention designed based on ASAP, about impairment mitigation, pursuing skilled movement leading to significant functional gains. Appropriate timing along with optimal dosage became an active ingredient in functional recovery in acute stroke subjects. The distributed practice might have added effect of spacing, resulting in easier learning and accuracy of skills. The study reveals that distributed practice can be part of regular clinical practice to enhance functional recovery in acute stroke rehabilitation.