牙种植体表面处理对下颌后牙缺失的固位效果:随机对照临床试验

Marwa Mohamed, Riham Fliefel, Ahmed Shaaban
{"title":"牙种植体表面处理对下颌后牙缺失的固位效果:随机对照临床试验","authors":"Marwa Mohamed, Riham Fliefel, Ahmed Shaaban","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2022.150273.1296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Dental implants have lately emerged as a feasible therapeutic alternative for replacing missing teeth. Implants have undergone continuous improvement to increase their functionality and longevity to meet patients' needs for shorter treatment periods and the need to deal with increasingly complex clinical situations. Surface modifications have been the focus of continuous improvement in modern implants, guiding a new era of surface treatment with chemically modified hydrophilic surfaces. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of \"Hydrophilic Surface Implants (HSI)\" on osseointegration in comparison to \"Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI) in the mandibular posterior area. Methodology: This randomized controlled clinical trial was executed on twelve patients with missing mandibular posterior teeth, randomly allocated into two groups. Group I: six patients received hydrophilic dental implants (HSI), while Group II: six patients received \"Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI). Implant stability, bone density, marginal bone loss, and biochemical analysis of bone formation using Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) were all assessed for both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning implant stability (P=0.381), bone density around the implants (P=0.326), marginal bone loss around the implants (P=0.416), or biomarkers of bone formation (RUNX2) (P=0.828) along the course of the clinical trial. CONCLUSION: The Hydrophilic Surface Implants (HSI)) showed better results compared to Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI) in all investigated parameters, although the difference was not statistically","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":" 82","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF SURFACE TREATMENT OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT ON THE SEOINTEGRATION IN MANDIBULAR POSTERIOR MISSING TEETH: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL\",\"authors\":\"Marwa Mohamed, Riham Fliefel, Ahmed Shaaban\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/adjalexu.2022.150273.1296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Dental implants have lately emerged as a feasible therapeutic alternative for replacing missing teeth. Implants have undergone continuous improvement to increase their functionality and longevity to meet patients' needs for shorter treatment periods and the need to deal with increasingly complex clinical situations. Surface modifications have been the focus of continuous improvement in modern implants, guiding a new era of surface treatment with chemically modified hydrophilic surfaces. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of \\\"Hydrophilic Surface Implants (HSI)\\\" on osseointegration in comparison to \\\"Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI) in the mandibular posterior area. Methodology: This randomized controlled clinical trial was executed on twelve patients with missing mandibular posterior teeth, randomly allocated into two groups. Group I: six patients received hydrophilic dental implants (HSI), while Group II: six patients received \\\"Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI). Implant stability, bone density, marginal bone loss, and biochemical analysis of bone formation using Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) were all assessed for both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning implant stability (P=0.381), bone density around the implants (P=0.326), marginal bone loss around the implants (P=0.416), or biomarkers of bone formation (RUNX2) (P=0.828) along the course of the clinical trial. CONCLUSION: The Hydrophilic Surface Implants (HSI)) showed better results compared to Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI) in all investigated parameters, although the difference was not statistically\",\"PeriodicalId\":7723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alexandria Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\" 82\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alexandria Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2022.150273.1296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2022.150273.1296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙种植体最近成为替代缺失牙齿的一种可行的治疗选择。植入物经过了不断的改进,以增加其功能和寿命,以满足患者对更短的治疗周期和处理日益复杂的临床情况的需要。表面修饰一直是现代植入物不断改进的焦点,引导了化学修饰亲水性表面表面处理的新时代。目的:评价“亲水表面种植体(HSI)”与“非亲水表面种植体(NSI)”在下颌后牙区对骨整合的影响。方法:对12例下颌后牙缺失患者进行随机对照临床试验,随机分为两组。第一组:6例患者接受亲水种植体(HSI),第二组:6例患者接受非亲水表面种植体(NSI)。采用runt相关转录因子2 (RUNX2)对两组的种植体稳定性、骨密度、边缘骨质流失以及骨形成的生化分析进行评估。结果:两组在临床试验过程中种植体稳定性(P=0.381)、种植体周围骨密度(P=0.326)、种植体周围边缘骨丢失(P=0.416)或骨形成生物标志物(RUNX2) (P=0.828)均无显著差异。结论:亲水表面种植体(HSI)在所有研究参数上均优于非亲水表面种植体(NSI),但差异无统计学意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF SURFACE TREATMENT OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT ON THE SEOINTEGRATION IN MANDIBULAR POSTERIOR MISSING TEETH: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
INTRODUCTION: Dental implants have lately emerged as a feasible therapeutic alternative for replacing missing teeth. Implants have undergone continuous improvement to increase their functionality and longevity to meet patients' needs for shorter treatment periods and the need to deal with increasingly complex clinical situations. Surface modifications have been the focus of continuous improvement in modern implants, guiding a new era of surface treatment with chemically modified hydrophilic surfaces. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of "Hydrophilic Surface Implants (HSI)" on osseointegration in comparison to "Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI) in the mandibular posterior area. Methodology: This randomized controlled clinical trial was executed on twelve patients with missing mandibular posterior teeth, randomly allocated into two groups. Group I: six patients received hydrophilic dental implants (HSI), while Group II: six patients received "Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI). Implant stability, bone density, marginal bone loss, and biochemical analysis of bone formation using Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) were all assessed for both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning implant stability (P=0.381), bone density around the implants (P=0.326), marginal bone loss around the implants (P=0.416), or biomarkers of bone formation (RUNX2) (P=0.828) along the course of the clinical trial. CONCLUSION: The Hydrophilic Surface Implants (HSI)) showed better results compared to Nonhydrophilic Surface Implants (NSI) in all investigated parameters, although the difference was not statistically
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信