粪肠球菌菌血症和感染性心内膜炎--我们还缺少什么?

Q3 Medicine
Clemency Nye , Alice Maxwell , Harriet Hughes , Jonathan Underwood
{"title":"粪肠球菌菌血症和感染性心内膜炎--我们还缺少什么?","authors":"Clemency Nye ,&nbsp;Alice Maxwell ,&nbsp;Harriet Hughes ,&nbsp;Jonathan Underwood","doi":"10.1016/j.clinpr.2023.100336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> is an increasingly common cause of infective endocarditis, with a recent study by Dahl <em>et al</em> demonstrating a prevalence of 26% of IE when transoesophageal echo was routinely undertaken. Another study undertaken by Østergaard <em>et al</em> found that 16.7% of patients with <em>E. faecalis</em> bacteraemia developed endocarditis. Based on these findings we examined the rates of IE diagnosed in our own health board to determine if our current practice is potentially missing cases of IE and if we could improve our management of these bacteraemias.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All blood cultures in patients over 18 which were positive for <em>E. faecalis</em> from October 2017 to March 2022 were reviewed. We analysed the patient characteristics, clinical outcomes and included a follow up period of 6 months to assess for recrudescence and treatment failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rate of patients with <em>E. faecalis</em> bacteraemia diagnosed with IE was 7.1%. If polymicrobial blood cultures were excluded this rose to 13.0%. Community acquisition, patient cardiac or immune risk factors, monomicrobial culture and multiple positive blood cultures all were associated with IE. 62.1% of patients with <em>E. faecalis</em> bacteraemia did not have an echocardiogram during their admission, due to a variety of reasons.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The lower reported rate of IE in our cohort may be explained by higher proportion of CVC related infections. However, given the low rates of echocardiography and poor correlation of echocardiography use with IE risk factors, it is likely that cases of IE are being missed, particularly in those with multiple risk factors. Despite this, there was no difference in one-year survival between those diagnosed with IE vs without IE. We have delivered education sessions and introduced a multidisciplinary team meeting to discuss infective endocarditis cases to address these issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33837,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infection in Practice","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259017022300119X/pdfft?md5=8b8c222fd93dbc40eb3b4d3dd7b756ba&pid=1-s2.0-S259017022300119X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia and infective endocarditis - what are we missing?\",\"authors\":\"Clemency Nye ,&nbsp;Alice Maxwell ,&nbsp;Harriet Hughes ,&nbsp;Jonathan Underwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinpr.2023.100336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> is an increasingly common cause of infective endocarditis, with a recent study by Dahl <em>et al</em> demonstrating a prevalence of 26% of IE when transoesophageal echo was routinely undertaken. Another study undertaken by Østergaard <em>et al</em> found that 16.7% of patients with <em>E. faecalis</em> bacteraemia developed endocarditis. Based on these findings we examined the rates of IE diagnosed in our own health board to determine if our current practice is potentially missing cases of IE and if we could improve our management of these bacteraemias.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All blood cultures in patients over 18 which were positive for <em>E. faecalis</em> from October 2017 to March 2022 were reviewed. We analysed the patient characteristics, clinical outcomes and included a follow up period of 6 months to assess for recrudescence and treatment failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rate of patients with <em>E. faecalis</em> bacteraemia diagnosed with IE was 7.1%. If polymicrobial blood cultures were excluded this rose to 13.0%. Community acquisition, patient cardiac or immune risk factors, monomicrobial culture and multiple positive blood cultures all were associated with IE. 62.1% of patients with <em>E. faecalis</em> bacteraemia did not have an echocardiogram during their admission, due to a variety of reasons.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The lower reported rate of IE in our cohort may be explained by higher proportion of CVC related infections. However, given the low rates of echocardiography and poor correlation of echocardiography use with IE risk factors, it is likely that cases of IE are being missed, particularly in those with multiple risk factors. Despite this, there was no difference in one-year survival between those diagnosed with IE vs without IE. We have delivered education sessions and introduced a multidisciplinary team meeting to discuss infective endocarditis cases to address these issues.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infection in Practice\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259017022300119X/pdfft?md5=8b8c222fd93dbc40eb3b4d3dd7b756ba&pid=1-s2.0-S259017022300119X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infection in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259017022300119X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infection in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259017022300119X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:粪肠球菌是感染性心内膜炎越来越常见的病因,Dahl 等人最近的一项研究表明,常规进行经食道超声检查时,IE 的发病率为 26%。Østergaard 等人的另一项研究发现,16.7% 的粪大肠杆菌菌血症患者发展为心内膜炎。根据这些研究结果,我们对自己所在卫生局的 IE 诊断率进行了检查,以确定我们目前的做法是否可能遗漏 IE 病例,以及我们是否可以改善对这些菌血症的管理。方法我们对 2017 年 10 月至 2022 年 3 月期间所有 18 岁以上粪肠球菌阳性患者的血液培养结果进行了回顾。我们分析了患者的特征、临床结果,并纳入了 6 个月的随访期,以评估复发和治疗失败的情况。结果被诊断为 IE 的粪大肠杆菌菌血症患者的比例为 7.1%。如果将多菌血液培养排除在外,这一比例将上升至 13.0%。社区感染、患者心脏或免疫风险因素、单菌培养和多次血液培养阳性均与 IE 有关。由于种种原因,62.1%的粪大肠杆菌菌血症患者在入院时没有进行超声心动图检查。 讨论我们队列中报告的 IE 感染率较低,原因可能是与 CVC 相关的感染比例较高。然而,由于超声心动图检查率较低,且超声心动图检查的使用与 IE 风险因素的相关性较差,IE 病例很可能被漏诊,尤其是那些存在多种风险因素的患者。尽管如此,确诊为 IE 的患者与未确诊为 IE 的患者的一年生存率并无差异。为了解决这些问题,我们开设了教育课程,并引入了多学科团队会议来讨论感染性心内膜炎病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia and infective endocarditis - what are we missing?

Introduction

Enterococcus faecalis is an increasingly common cause of infective endocarditis, with a recent study by Dahl et al demonstrating a prevalence of 26% of IE when transoesophageal echo was routinely undertaken. Another study undertaken by Østergaard et al found that 16.7% of patients with E. faecalis bacteraemia developed endocarditis. Based on these findings we examined the rates of IE diagnosed in our own health board to determine if our current practice is potentially missing cases of IE and if we could improve our management of these bacteraemias.

Methods

All blood cultures in patients over 18 which were positive for E. faecalis from October 2017 to March 2022 were reviewed. We analysed the patient characteristics, clinical outcomes and included a follow up period of 6 months to assess for recrudescence and treatment failure.

Results

The rate of patients with E. faecalis bacteraemia diagnosed with IE was 7.1%. If polymicrobial blood cultures were excluded this rose to 13.0%. Community acquisition, patient cardiac or immune risk factors, monomicrobial culture and multiple positive blood cultures all were associated with IE. 62.1% of patients with E. faecalis bacteraemia did not have an echocardiogram during their admission, due to a variety of reasons.

Discussion

The lower reported rate of IE in our cohort may be explained by higher proportion of CVC related infections. However, given the low rates of echocardiography and poor correlation of echocardiography use with IE risk factors, it is likely that cases of IE are being missed, particularly in those with multiple risk factors. Despite this, there was no difference in one-year survival between those diagnosed with IE vs without IE. We have delivered education sessions and introduced a multidisciplinary team meeting to discuss infective endocarditis cases to address these issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infection in Practice
Clinical Infection in Practice Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信