头孢吡肟、美罗培南和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦对 MSSA 菌血症或肺炎多微生物感染患者的抗葡萄球菌疗效

IF 2.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Laila M. Najia, Eric Pyles, Arnaldo Lopez-Ruiz, Bibidh Subedi
{"title":"头孢吡肟、美罗培南和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦对 MSSA 菌血症或肺炎多微生物感染患者的抗葡萄球菌疗效","authors":"Laila M. Najia, Eric Pyles, Arnaldo Lopez-Ruiz, Bibidh Subedi","doi":"10.1155/2023/7684613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a paucity of literature describing de-escalation techniques in patients with polymicrobial infections with one offending organism being methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) being treated with β-lactam therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine treatment outcomes for patients with polymicrobial infections with MSSA bacteremia or pneumonia who are treated with cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM), or piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). This trial design represents a retrospective observational three-group comparison study of patients at a community teaching hospital system. Patients reviewed included those who had a MSSA bacteremia or pneumonia in addition to a confirmed polymicrobial infection or presence of a coinfection and received definitive therapy with FEP, MEM, or TZP. The primary outcome is defined as the resolution of fever of ≥100.4°F, hypothermia (≤95°F), leukocytosis (WBC °>° 12,000 cells/mm3), and leukopenia with WBC °<° 4,000 cells/mm3. Secondary outcomes included duration of definite therapy, in-hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates for a presumed infection, and hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (HCDI). From August 1, 2016, to August 30, 2019, 45 patients met eligibility criteria. There were no observed differences in primary endpoint (p = 0.65) or secondary endpoints, i.e., in-hospital mortality (p = 0.10), hospital LOS (p = 0.75), ICU LOS (p = 0.53), 30-day readmission rates for presumed infection (p = 0.07), or HCDI (p = 0.34). There was no difference in treatment success with FEP, MEM, or TZP for polymicrobial infections with one offending organism being MSSA. Due to the lack of evidence in this unique patient population and observed results of our study, randomized studies are warranted to determine appropriate therapy in this complex patient population.","PeriodicalId":7369,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"115 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antistaphylococcal Efficacy of Cefepime, Meropenem, and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Patients with Polymicrobial Infection with MSSA Bacteremia or Pneumonia\",\"authors\":\"Laila M. Najia, Eric Pyles, Arnaldo Lopez-Ruiz, Bibidh Subedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/7684613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a paucity of literature describing de-escalation techniques in patients with polymicrobial infections with one offending organism being methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) being treated with β-lactam therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine treatment outcomes for patients with polymicrobial infections with MSSA bacteremia or pneumonia who are treated with cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM), or piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). This trial design represents a retrospective observational three-group comparison study of patients at a community teaching hospital system. Patients reviewed included those who had a MSSA bacteremia or pneumonia in addition to a confirmed polymicrobial infection or presence of a coinfection and received definitive therapy with FEP, MEM, or TZP. The primary outcome is defined as the resolution of fever of ≥100.4°F, hypothermia (≤95°F), leukocytosis (WBC °>° 12,000 cells/mm3), and leukopenia with WBC °<° 4,000 cells/mm3. Secondary outcomes included duration of definite therapy, in-hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates for a presumed infection, and hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (HCDI). From August 1, 2016, to August 30, 2019, 45 patients met eligibility criteria. There were no observed differences in primary endpoint (p = 0.65) or secondary endpoints, i.e., in-hospital mortality (p = 0.10), hospital LOS (p = 0.75), ICU LOS (p = 0.53), 30-day readmission rates for presumed infection (p = 0.07), or HCDI (p = 0.34). There was no difference in treatment success with FEP, MEM, or TZP for polymicrobial infections with one offending organism being MSSA. Due to the lack of evidence in this unique patient population and observed results of our study, randomized studies are warranted to determine appropriate therapy in this complex patient population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"115 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7684613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7684613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多微生物感染患者使用β-内酰胺疗法治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)时,文献中描述的降级技术较少。本研究的目的是确定接受头孢吡肟(FEP)、美罗培南(MEM)或哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(TZP)治疗的MSSA菌血症或肺炎多微生物感染患者的治疗结果。本试验设计是对社区教学医院系统的患者进行回顾性观察性三组比较研究。回顾的患者包括有MSSA菌血症或肺炎,以及确诊的多微生物感染或合并感染,并接受FEP、MEM或TZP的最终治疗的患者。主要结局定义为发热≥100.4°F、体温过低(≤95°F)、白细胞增多(WBC°> 12000细胞/mm3)和白细胞减少(WBC°< 4000细胞/mm3)的消退。次要结局包括明确治疗的持续时间、住院死亡率、住院和ICU住院时间(LOS)、假定感染的30天再入院率和医院获得性艰难梭菌感染(HCDI)。2016年8月1日至2019年8月30日,45例患者符合入选标准。在主要终点(p = 0.65)或次要终点,即院内死亡率(p = 0.10)、医院LOS (p = 0.75)、ICU LOS (p = 0.53)、假定感染的30天再入院率(p = 0.07)或HCDI (p = 0.34)方面没有观察到差异。FEP、MEM或TZP治疗多微生物感染的成功率无差异,其中一种致病微生物为MSSA。由于缺乏这一独特患者群体的证据和我们研究的观察结果,随机研究是有必要的,以确定在这一复杂患者群体中适当的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antistaphylococcal Efficacy of Cefepime, Meropenem, and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Patients with Polymicrobial Infection with MSSA Bacteremia or Pneumonia
There is a paucity of literature describing de-escalation techniques in patients with polymicrobial infections with one offending organism being methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) being treated with β-lactam therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine treatment outcomes for patients with polymicrobial infections with MSSA bacteremia or pneumonia who are treated with cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM), or piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). This trial design represents a retrospective observational three-group comparison study of patients at a community teaching hospital system. Patients reviewed included those who had a MSSA bacteremia or pneumonia in addition to a confirmed polymicrobial infection or presence of a coinfection and received definitive therapy with FEP, MEM, or TZP. The primary outcome is defined as the resolution of fever of ≥100.4°F, hypothermia (≤95°F), leukocytosis (WBC °>° 12,000 cells/mm3), and leukopenia with WBC °<° 4,000 cells/mm3. Secondary outcomes included duration of definite therapy, in-hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates for a presumed infection, and hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (HCDI). From August 1, 2016, to August 30, 2019, 45 patients met eligibility criteria. There were no observed differences in primary endpoint (p = 0.65) or secondary endpoints, i.e., in-hospital mortality (p = 0.10), hospital LOS (p = 0.75), ICU LOS (p = 0.53), 30-day readmission rates for presumed infection (p = 0.07), or HCDI (p = 0.34). There was no difference in treatment success with FEP, MEM, or TZP for polymicrobial infections with one offending organism being MSSA. Due to the lack of evidence in this unique patient population and observed results of our study, randomized studies are warranted to determine appropriate therapy in this complex patient population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信