以用户为中心的设计与服务探索研究》:影响采用拼车共享的因素

Rakesh Gangadharaiah, Haotian Su, Elenah B. Rosopa, Kristin Kolodge MS, Lisa Boor, Patrick J. Rosopa, Yunyi Jia, Johnell Brooks
{"title":"以用户为中心的设计与服务探索研究》:影响采用拼车共享的因素","authors":"Rakesh Gangadharaiah, Haotian Su, Elenah B. Rosopa, Kristin Kolodge MS, Lisa Boor, Patrick J. Rosopa, Yunyi Jia, Johnell Brooks","doi":"10.1177/21695067231192636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of real-time information communication through smartphones and wireless networks enabled the growth of ridesharing services. While personal rideshare services (individuals ride alone or with people they know) initially dominated the market, the popularity of pooled ridesharing (individuals share rides with strangers) has grown globally. However, pooled rideshare remains less common in the U.S., where personal vehicle usage is still the norm. Vehicle design and rideshare services may need to be tailored to user preferences to increase pooled rideshare adoption. A national U.S. survey ( N = 5,385) used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to identify four key factors influencing riders’ willingness to consider pooled rideshare: comfort/ease of use, convenience, vehicle technology/accessibility, and passenger safety. Understanding and implementing these user-centered design principles and service-related factors may be critical for increasing the future use of pooled rideshare services in the U.S.","PeriodicalId":20673,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","volume":"116 50","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Adoption of Pooled Rideshare An Explorative Study on User-Centered Design and Services\",\"authors\":\"Rakesh Gangadharaiah, Haotian Su, Elenah B. Rosopa, Kristin Kolodge MS, Lisa Boor, Patrick J. Rosopa, Yunyi Jia, Johnell Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21695067231192636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of real-time information communication through smartphones and wireless networks enabled the growth of ridesharing services. While personal rideshare services (individuals ride alone or with people they know) initially dominated the market, the popularity of pooled ridesharing (individuals share rides with strangers) has grown globally. However, pooled rideshare remains less common in the U.S., where personal vehicle usage is still the norm. Vehicle design and rideshare services may need to be tailored to user preferences to increase pooled rideshare adoption. A national U.S. survey ( N = 5,385) used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to identify four key factors influencing riders’ willingness to consider pooled rideshare: comfort/ease of use, convenience, vehicle technology/accessibility, and passenger safety. Understanding and implementing these user-centered design principles and service-related factors may be critical for increasing the future use of pooled rideshare services in the U.S.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting\",\"volume\":\"116 50\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过智能手机和无线网络的实时信息通信的兴起,使拼车服务得以增长。虽然个人拼车服务(个人单独或与认识的人一起拼车)最初主导了市场,但拼车服务(个人与陌生人拼车)在全球范围内越来越受欢迎。然而,拼车在美国仍然不太常见,个人车辆的使用仍然是常态。车辆设计和拼车服务可能需要根据用户偏好进行定制,以提高拼车的使用率。一项美国全国调查(N = 5385)使用探索性和验证性因素分析来确定影响乘客考虑拼车意愿的四个关键因素:舒适/易用性、便利性、车辆技术/可达性和乘客安全。理解并实施这些以用户为中心的设计原则和与服务相关的因素,对于未来在美国增加拼车服务的使用至关重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing Adoption of Pooled Rideshare An Explorative Study on User-Centered Design and Services
The rise of real-time information communication through smartphones and wireless networks enabled the growth of ridesharing services. While personal rideshare services (individuals ride alone or with people they know) initially dominated the market, the popularity of pooled ridesharing (individuals share rides with strangers) has grown globally. However, pooled rideshare remains less common in the U.S., where personal vehicle usage is still the norm. Vehicle design and rideshare services may need to be tailored to user preferences to increase pooled rideshare adoption. A national U.S. survey ( N = 5,385) used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to identify four key factors influencing riders’ willingness to consider pooled rideshare: comfort/ease of use, convenience, vehicle technology/accessibility, and passenger safety. Understanding and implementing these user-centered design principles and service-related factors may be critical for increasing the future use of pooled rideshare services in the U.S.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信