MSL 角色和关键绩效指标 (KPI):从传统到未来

Veronica Battaglia, Dott. Fabio Landi
{"title":"MSL 角色和关键绩效指标 (KPI):从传统到未来","authors":"Veronica Battaglia, Dott. Fabio Landi","doi":"10.18535/jmscr/v11i11.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives and methods Medical Scientific Liaisons (MSLs) are essential assets for the pharma company. MSLs are scientific experts in a therapeutic area, and their role is to link industry and doctors to disseminate scientific information and gather insights on unmet medical needs. Their role is quite different from others in the industry because based on quality more than quantity; therefore, there still needs to be an evaluation method able to capture in full the potential of the role. This results in MSLs needing to feel more valued and the industry needing to demonstrate the value that MSLs bring to the company. This work aimed to collect all the information available in the literature on metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) currently used for MSL's evaluation. To achieve that, I collected data from trusted and specialized papers, using PubMed as the central database. An interesting factor is the scarcity of published material on the issue, even if the topic is considered central for both industry and MSLs. I also had some interviews with experts in the field. Their contributions were precious because they helped me fill the literature's lack of data. Collecting all the information available helped me better understand the role of the MSL and clearly showed that the current metric system can be improved.","PeriodicalId":16362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MSL Role and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): From Traditional to the Future\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Battaglia, Dott. Fabio Landi\",\"doi\":\"10.18535/jmscr/v11i11.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives and methods Medical Scientific Liaisons (MSLs) are essential assets for the pharma company. MSLs are scientific experts in a therapeutic area, and their role is to link industry and doctors to disseminate scientific information and gather insights on unmet medical needs. Their role is quite different from others in the industry because based on quality more than quantity; therefore, there still needs to be an evaluation method able to capture in full the potential of the role. This results in MSLs needing to feel more valued and the industry needing to demonstrate the value that MSLs bring to the company. This work aimed to collect all the information available in the literature on metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) currently used for MSL's evaluation. To achieve that, I collected data from trusted and specialized papers, using PubMed as the central database. An interesting factor is the scarcity of published material on the issue, even if the topic is considered central for both industry and MSLs. I also had some interviews with experts in the field. Their contributions were precious because they helped me fill the literature's lack of data. Collecting all the information available helped me better understand the role of the MSL and clearly showed that the current metric system can be improved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v11i11.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v11i11.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和方法医学科学联络员是制药公司的重要资产。msl是某一治疗领域的科学专家,他们的作用是将工业界和医生联系起来,传播科学信息,并收集对未满足的医疗需求的见解。他们的角色与业内其他公司截然不同,因为他们更注重质量而非数量;因此,仍然需要一种能够充分发挥这一作用潜力的评价方法。这导致MSLs需要感到更有价值,行业需要证明MSLs给公司带来的价值。这项工作旨在收集目前用于MSL评估的度量和关键绩效指标(kpi)文献中的所有可用信息。为了实现这一目标,我从可信的专业论文中收集数据,使用PubMed作为中心数据库。一个有趣的因素是,尽管这个话题被认为是行业和MSLs的核心,但关于这个问题的出版材料却很少。我还采访了一些该领域的专家。他们的贡献是宝贵的,因为他们帮助我填补了文献中数据的不足。收集所有可用的信息帮助我更好地理解MSL的作用,并清楚地表明,目前的公制系统可以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MSL Role and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): From Traditional to the Future
Objectives and methods Medical Scientific Liaisons (MSLs) are essential assets for the pharma company. MSLs are scientific experts in a therapeutic area, and their role is to link industry and doctors to disseminate scientific information and gather insights on unmet medical needs. Their role is quite different from others in the industry because based on quality more than quantity; therefore, there still needs to be an evaluation method able to capture in full the potential of the role. This results in MSLs needing to feel more valued and the industry needing to demonstrate the value that MSLs bring to the company. This work aimed to collect all the information available in the literature on metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) currently used for MSL's evaluation. To achieve that, I collected data from trusted and specialized papers, using PubMed as the central database. An interesting factor is the scarcity of published material on the issue, even if the topic is considered central for both industry and MSLs. I also had some interviews with experts in the field. Their contributions were precious because they helped me fill the literature's lack of data. Collecting all the information available helped me better understand the role of the MSL and clearly showed that the current metric system can be improved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信