Samariddin S. Barotov, Firuza Yusufovna Nasyrova, Farzona A. Abdukholiqova
{"title":"塔吉克斯坦转基因作物的鉴定","authors":"Samariddin S. Barotov, Firuza Yusufovna Nasyrova, Farzona A. Abdukholiqova","doi":"10.17816/ecogen568487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The technology of genetically modified crops (also called GM crops, GM products) allows, using genetic engineering methods, to select a specific genetic trait of one organism for inclusion in the genome of the original crop. This has made it possible to develop food crops with beneficial properties and eliminate undesirable properties in others. Despite the great agricultural benefits of transgenic crops, they have not gained acceptance in some countries: a) consumer suspicion due to allergic reactions observed to some transgenic products, b) lack of international regulations regarding these GM crops and c) negative environmental impacts Wednesday. Impacts resulting from mass production of transgenic crops, such as loss of genetic diversity, development of more adaptive weeds, migration of transgenic genes to their wild relatives, and less likely migration of transgenic genes to other unrelated organisms through horizontal transfer [1]. In addition, contamination of food products with transgenic residues has prompted various countries to restrict the import of food products made from transgenic plants or plants labeling products or ingredients as or derived from transgenic crops [2]. \nThe aim of this study is to qualitatively evaluate various GM crops from the perspective of landrace conservation and sustainable development to achieve food security. \nSix varieties of agricultural crops were selected as the object of study: 2 varieties of tomatoes imported from abroad (2022 harvest at the experimental site of the IBPPG TNAS), 1st grade potatoes from the Dushanbe market (produced in Pakistan), 2 varieties of local production. “Sharaf” corn and 1 variety of corn (made in China). \nIsolation of genomic DNA was carried out according to the method: Easy Pure Food and Fodder Security Genomic DNA Kit (TransGen Biotech., China), or EasyPure Plant Genomic DNA Kit (TransGen Biotech., China). Identification was carried out using primers to the CaMV35S promoter. \nThe results of PCR identification of GMOs showed that the endogenous CaMV35S promoter was found in potatoes (produced in Pakistan) and corn (produced in China). This endogenous CaMV35S promoter was not detected in the local tomato and potato and maize landraces studied, indicating the absence of a GM source in these samples. \nThis is consistent with the data that the local varieties of the studied crops are traditional and do not contain GM sources.","PeriodicalId":11431,"journal":{"name":"Ecological genetics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of genetically modified crops in Tajikistan\",\"authors\":\"Samariddin S. Barotov, Firuza Yusufovna Nasyrova, Farzona A. Abdukholiqova\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/ecogen568487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The technology of genetically modified crops (also called GM crops, GM products) allows, using genetic engineering methods, to select a specific genetic trait of one organism for inclusion in the genome of the original crop. This has made it possible to develop food crops with beneficial properties and eliminate undesirable properties in others. Despite the great agricultural benefits of transgenic crops, they have not gained acceptance in some countries: a) consumer suspicion due to allergic reactions observed to some transgenic products, b) lack of international regulations regarding these GM crops and c) negative environmental impacts Wednesday. Impacts resulting from mass production of transgenic crops, such as loss of genetic diversity, development of more adaptive weeds, migration of transgenic genes to their wild relatives, and less likely migration of transgenic genes to other unrelated organisms through horizontal transfer [1]. In addition, contamination of food products with transgenic residues has prompted various countries to restrict the import of food products made from transgenic plants or plants labeling products or ingredients as or derived from transgenic crops [2]. \\nThe aim of this study is to qualitatively evaluate various GM crops from the perspective of landrace conservation and sustainable development to achieve food security. \\nSix varieties of agricultural crops were selected as the object of study: 2 varieties of tomatoes imported from abroad (2022 harvest at the experimental site of the IBPPG TNAS), 1st grade potatoes from the Dushanbe market (produced in Pakistan), 2 varieties of local production. “Sharaf” corn and 1 variety of corn (made in China). \\nIsolation of genomic DNA was carried out according to the method: Easy Pure Food and Fodder Security Genomic DNA Kit (TransGen Biotech., China), or EasyPure Plant Genomic DNA Kit (TransGen Biotech., China). Identification was carried out using primers to the CaMV35S promoter. \\nThe results of PCR identification of GMOs showed that the endogenous CaMV35S promoter was found in potatoes (produced in Pakistan) and corn (produced in China). This endogenous CaMV35S promoter was not detected in the local tomato and potato and maize landraces studied, indicating the absence of a GM source in these samples. \\nThis is consistent with the data that the local varieties of the studied crops are traditional and do not contain GM sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological genetics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen568487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen568487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
转基因作物技术(也称为转基因作物、转基因产品)允许使用基因工程方法选择一种生物体的特定遗传性状,将其包含在原作物的基因组中。这使得开发具有有益特性的粮食作物并消除其他作物的不良特性成为可能。尽管转基因作物具有巨大的农业效益,但它们在一些国家并没有被接受:a)由于对某些转基因产品的过敏反应而引起消费者的怀疑,b)缺乏关于这些转基因作物的国际法规,以及c)负面的环境影响。转基因作物大规模生产带来的影响,如遗传多样性的丧失、适应性更强的杂草的产生、转基因基因向其野生近缘种的迁移,以及转基因基因通过水平转移向其他不相关生物迁移的可能性降低[1]。此外,由于食品受到转基因残留的污染,各国都限制进口由转基因植物制成的食品或标明转基因作物或源自转基因作物的产品或成分的植物[2]。本研究的目的是从地方保护和可持续发展的角度对各种转基因作物进行定性评价,以实现粮食安全。选择6个农作物品种作为研究对象:2个从国外进口的西红柿品种(IBPPG TNAS实验地2022年收获),杜尚别市场的一级土豆品种(巴基斯坦生产),2个当地生产的品种。“沙拉夫”玉米和1个玉米品种(中国制造)。基因组DNA的分离方法为Easy Pure Food and Fodder Security基因组DNA Kit (TransGen Biotech)。或EasyPure植物基因组DNA试剂盒(TransGen Biotech. ltd .)。,中国)。利用CaMV35S启动子的引物进行鉴定。转基因生物的PCR鉴定结果显示,在巴基斯坦产的马铃薯和中国产的玉米中均发现了内源CaMV35S启动子。该内源性CaMV35S启动子未在当地番茄、马铃薯和玉米地方品种中检测到,表明这些样品中缺乏转基因来源。这与研究作物的当地品种是传统的,不含转基因来源的数据是一致的。
Identification of genetically modified crops in Tajikistan
The technology of genetically modified crops (also called GM crops, GM products) allows, using genetic engineering methods, to select a specific genetic trait of one organism for inclusion in the genome of the original crop. This has made it possible to develop food crops with beneficial properties and eliminate undesirable properties in others. Despite the great agricultural benefits of transgenic crops, they have not gained acceptance in some countries: a) consumer suspicion due to allergic reactions observed to some transgenic products, b) lack of international regulations regarding these GM crops and c) negative environmental impacts Wednesday. Impacts resulting from mass production of transgenic crops, such as loss of genetic diversity, development of more adaptive weeds, migration of transgenic genes to their wild relatives, and less likely migration of transgenic genes to other unrelated organisms through horizontal transfer [1]. In addition, contamination of food products with transgenic residues has prompted various countries to restrict the import of food products made from transgenic plants or plants labeling products or ingredients as or derived from transgenic crops [2].
The aim of this study is to qualitatively evaluate various GM crops from the perspective of landrace conservation and sustainable development to achieve food security.
Six varieties of agricultural crops were selected as the object of study: 2 varieties of tomatoes imported from abroad (2022 harvest at the experimental site of the IBPPG TNAS), 1st grade potatoes from the Dushanbe market (produced in Pakistan), 2 varieties of local production. “Sharaf” corn and 1 variety of corn (made in China).
Isolation of genomic DNA was carried out according to the method: Easy Pure Food and Fodder Security Genomic DNA Kit (TransGen Biotech., China), or EasyPure Plant Genomic DNA Kit (TransGen Biotech., China). Identification was carried out using primers to the CaMV35S promoter.
The results of PCR identification of GMOs showed that the endogenous CaMV35S promoter was found in potatoes (produced in Pakistan) and corn (produced in China). This endogenous CaMV35S promoter was not detected in the local tomato and potato and maize landraces studied, indicating the absence of a GM source in these samples.
This is consistent with the data that the local varieties of the studied crops are traditional and do not contain GM sources.
期刊介绍:
The journal Ecological genetics is an international journal which accepts for consideration original manuscripts that reflect the results of field and experimental studies, and fundamental research of broad conceptual and/or comparative context corresponding to the profile of the Journal. Once a year, the editorial Board reviews and, if necessary, corrects the rules for authors and the journal rubrics.