基于研究领域标准框架的跨诊断疗法与常规治疗和经颅直流电刺激治疗成人非自杀性自伤的效果比较:随机对照试验

Q4 Medicine
Hossein Farrokhi, I. Bigdeli, A. Mashhadi, Seyed Ruhollah Hosseini
{"title":"基于研究领域标准框架的跨诊断疗法与常规治疗和经颅直流电刺激治疗成人非自杀性自伤的效果比较:随机对照试验","authors":"Hossein Farrokhi, I. Bigdeli, A. Mashhadi, Seyed Ruhollah Hosseini","doi":"10.5812/ijhrba-140120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a serious and prevalent problem among the adult population. Despite its significant issue in clinical settings, there is a lack of effective, evidence-based, and affordable treatment options for NSSI. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacies of transdiagnostic therapy based on the Research Domain Criteria framework (TTB-RDoC) with treatment as usual (TAU) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of adult NSSI. Methods: A total of 68 males aged 18-30 years diagnosed with NSSI participated in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants were randomly assigned to 3 groups: TTB-RDoC (n = 24), TAU (n = 22), and tDCS (n = 22). Nonsuicidal self-injury and transdiagnostic symptoms were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and during a 12-month follow-up. Results: Both TAU and TTB-RDoC treatments resulted in significantly lower ratings across all measures compared to tDCS at post-treatment (all P values < 0.001). TAU and TTB-RDoC showed significantly greater reductions in NSSI (P = 0.001 [post-treatment]; P = 0.001 [follow-up]) compared to tDCS. Conclusions: TTB-RDoC treatment may be an effective strategy to improve long-term treatment outcomes in adult NSSI.","PeriodicalId":53452,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Therapy Based on the Research Domain Criteria Framework Compared with Treatment as Usual and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adult Nonsuicidal Self-injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Farrokhi, I. Bigdeli, A. Mashhadi, Seyed Ruhollah Hosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ijhrba-140120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a serious and prevalent problem among the adult population. Despite its significant issue in clinical settings, there is a lack of effective, evidence-based, and affordable treatment options for NSSI. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacies of transdiagnostic therapy based on the Research Domain Criteria framework (TTB-RDoC) with treatment as usual (TAU) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of adult NSSI. Methods: A total of 68 males aged 18-30 years diagnosed with NSSI participated in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants were randomly assigned to 3 groups: TTB-RDoC (n = 24), TAU (n = 22), and tDCS (n = 22). Nonsuicidal self-injury and transdiagnostic symptoms were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and during a 12-month follow-up. Results: Both TAU and TTB-RDoC treatments resulted in significantly lower ratings across all measures compared to tDCS at post-treatment (all P values < 0.001). TAU and TTB-RDoC showed significantly greater reductions in NSSI (P = 0.001 [post-treatment]; P = 0.001 [follow-up]) compared to tDCS. Conclusions: TTB-RDoC treatment may be an effective strategy to improve long-term treatment outcomes in adult NSSI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba-140120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba-140120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非自杀性自伤(NSSI)是成年人中一个严重而普遍的问题。尽管在临床环境中存在重大问题,但缺乏有效的、循证的、负担得起的自伤治疗方案。目的:本研究旨在比较基于研究领域标准框架(TTB-RDoC)的诊断治疗与常规治疗(TAU)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗成人自伤的疗效。方法:随机对照试验(RCT)共68例男性,年龄18-30岁,诊断为自伤。参与者随机分为3组:TTB-RDoC (n = 24), TAU (n = 22)和tDCS (n = 22)。在基线、治疗后和12个月的随访期间评估非自杀性自伤和跨诊断症状。结果:与tDCS治疗后相比,TAU和TTB-RDoC治疗导致所有测量的评分显著降低(所有P值< 0.001)。TAU和TTB-RDoC治疗后自伤发生率显著降低(P = 0.001);P = 0.001[随访])。结论:TTB-RDoC治疗可能是改善成人自伤长期治疗效果的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Therapy Based on the Research Domain Criteria Framework Compared with Treatment as Usual and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adult Nonsuicidal Self-injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a serious and prevalent problem among the adult population. Despite its significant issue in clinical settings, there is a lack of effective, evidence-based, and affordable treatment options for NSSI. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacies of transdiagnostic therapy based on the Research Domain Criteria framework (TTB-RDoC) with treatment as usual (TAU) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of adult NSSI. Methods: A total of 68 males aged 18-30 years diagnosed with NSSI participated in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants were randomly assigned to 3 groups: TTB-RDoC (n = 24), TAU (n = 22), and tDCS (n = 22). Nonsuicidal self-injury and transdiagnostic symptoms were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and during a 12-month follow-up. Results: Both TAU and TTB-RDoC treatments resulted in significantly lower ratings across all measures compared to tDCS at post-treatment (all P values < 0.001). TAU and TTB-RDoC showed significantly greater reductions in NSSI (P = 0.001 [post-treatment]; P = 0.001 [follow-up]) compared to tDCS. Conclusions: TTB-RDoC treatment may be an effective strategy to improve long-term treatment outcomes in adult NSSI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction is a clinical journal which is informative to all fields related to the high risk behaviors, addiction, including smoking, alcohol consumption and substance abuse, unsafe sexual behavior, obesity and unhealthy eating habits, physical inactivity, and violence, suicidal behavior, and self-injurious behaviors. International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction is an authentic clinical journal which its content is devoted to the particular compilation of the latest worldwide and interdisciplinary approach and findings including original manuscripts, meta-analyses and reviews, health economic papers, debates, and consensus statements of the clinical relevance of Risky behaviors and addiction. In addition, consensus evidential reports not only highlight the new observations, original research and results accompanied by innovative treatments and all the other relevant topics but also include highlighting disease mechanisms or important clinical observations and letters on articles published in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信