不同降雨强度下结合极限平衡法的黄土斜坡稳定性分析

IF 3.1 Q1 Mathematics
Yongde Liu, Yongdong Yang, Aiping Hu
{"title":"不同降雨强度下结合极限平衡法的黄土斜坡稳定性分析","authors":"Yongde Liu, Yongdong Yang, Aiping Hu","doi":"10.2478/amns.2023.2.01384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Due to the special characteristics of loess soil, once the stability of the slope is not detected in place, it is easy to cause serious loss of life and property, so this paper is based on the limit equilibrium method to analyze the stability of loess slopes under different rainfall intensities. The simplified Bishop’s method, the proposed static method, and the strength reduction method under the limit equilibrium method are studied to provide a reference basis for subsequent research. Explore the law of rainwater infiltration in loess under different rainfall conditions, construct a water-wetting model, investigate the seepage law of loess slope, and detect the degree of wetting and seepage of loess soil under different rainfall conditions. Combining the principle of effective stress of saturated soil, analyze the mechanical characteristics of the unsaturated soil on the loess slope. The stability of loess slopes under natural conditions and seismic conditions is analyzed, and the pore water pressure and shear strength of the sliding surface of loess slopes are analyzed under different rainfall conditions. The experimental data show that the slope safety coefficient of the simplified Bishop-limit equilibrium method under natural conditions is 1.118, and the difference with other algorithms is about 2.9%, which shows that the safety coefficient of the simplified Bishop-limit equilibrium method is more accurate to detect when combined with the slope stability model. When the rainfall intensity is 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75mm/h, the slope safety factor is 1.18, 1.14, 1.125, 1.12, and 0.98, respectively, the rainfall intensity is negatively correlated with the slope safety factor.","PeriodicalId":52342,"journal":{"name":"Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability analysis of loess slope combined with limit equilibrium method under different rainfall intensities\",\"authors\":\"Yongde Liu, Yongdong Yang, Aiping Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/amns.2023.2.01384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Due to the special characteristics of loess soil, once the stability of the slope is not detected in place, it is easy to cause serious loss of life and property, so this paper is based on the limit equilibrium method to analyze the stability of loess slopes under different rainfall intensities. The simplified Bishop’s method, the proposed static method, and the strength reduction method under the limit equilibrium method are studied to provide a reference basis for subsequent research. Explore the law of rainwater infiltration in loess under different rainfall conditions, construct a water-wetting model, investigate the seepage law of loess slope, and detect the degree of wetting and seepage of loess soil under different rainfall conditions. Combining the principle of effective stress of saturated soil, analyze the mechanical characteristics of the unsaturated soil on the loess slope. The stability of loess slopes under natural conditions and seismic conditions is analyzed, and the pore water pressure and shear strength of the sliding surface of loess slopes are analyzed under different rainfall conditions. The experimental data show that the slope safety coefficient of the simplified Bishop-limit equilibrium method under natural conditions is 1.118, and the difference with other algorithms is about 2.9%, which shows that the safety coefficient of the simplified Bishop-limit equilibrium method is more accurate to detect when combined with the slope stability model. When the rainfall intensity is 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75mm/h, the slope safety factor is 1.18, 1.14, 1.125, 1.12, and 0.98, respectively, the rainfall intensity is negatively correlated with the slope safety factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要由于黄土土的特殊特性,一旦边坡稳定性检测不到位,很容易造成严重的生命财产损失,因此本文基于极限平衡法对不同降雨强度下的黄土边坡稳定性进行分析。研究了简化的Bishop法、提出的静力法以及极限平衡法下的强度折减法,为后续研究提供参考依据。探索不同降雨条件下雨水在黄土中的入渗规律,构建水润湿模型,研究黄土边坡的渗流规律,检测不同降雨条件下黄土土体的润湿和渗流程度。结合饱和土有效应力原理,分析了黄土边坡非饱和土的力学特性。分析了自然条件和地震条件下黄土边坡的稳定性,分析了不同降雨条件下黄土边坡滑面孔隙水压力和抗剪强度。实验数据表明,简化的bishop -极限平衡法在自然条件下的边坡安全系数为1.118,与其他算法的差值约为2.9%,表明简化的bishop -极限平衡法与边坡稳定模型相结合时,安全系数的检测更为准确。当降雨强度为15、30、45、60、75mm/h时,边坡安全系数分别为1.18、1.14、1.125、1.12、0.98,降雨强度与边坡安全系数呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability analysis of loess slope combined with limit equilibrium method under different rainfall intensities
Abstract Due to the special characteristics of loess soil, once the stability of the slope is not detected in place, it is easy to cause serious loss of life and property, so this paper is based on the limit equilibrium method to analyze the stability of loess slopes under different rainfall intensities. The simplified Bishop’s method, the proposed static method, and the strength reduction method under the limit equilibrium method are studied to provide a reference basis for subsequent research. Explore the law of rainwater infiltration in loess under different rainfall conditions, construct a water-wetting model, investigate the seepage law of loess slope, and detect the degree of wetting and seepage of loess soil under different rainfall conditions. Combining the principle of effective stress of saturated soil, analyze the mechanical characteristics of the unsaturated soil on the loess slope. The stability of loess slopes under natural conditions and seismic conditions is analyzed, and the pore water pressure and shear strength of the sliding surface of loess slopes are analyzed under different rainfall conditions. The experimental data show that the slope safety coefficient of the simplified Bishop-limit equilibrium method under natural conditions is 1.118, and the difference with other algorithms is about 2.9%, which shows that the safety coefficient of the simplified Bishop-limit equilibrium method is more accurate to detect when combined with the slope stability model. When the rainfall intensity is 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75mm/h, the slope safety factor is 1.18, 1.14, 1.125, 1.12, and 0.98, respectively, the rainfall intensity is negatively correlated with the slope safety factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
25.80%
发文量
203
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信