你必须去寻找信息":有寄养经历的待产和育儿青年利用服务的障碍

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Kalah M. Villagrana PhD, MSW, MPA, Ann Turnlund Carver MSW, Lynn C. Holley PhD, ACSW, Ijeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya PhD, MSW, Tonia Stott PhD, MSW, Ramona Denby PhD, MSW, Kristin M. Ferguson PhD, MSW
{"title":"你必须去寻找信息\":有寄养经历的待产和育儿青年利用服务的障碍","authors":"Kalah M. Villagrana PhD, MSW, MPA,&nbsp;Ann Turnlund Carver MSW,&nbsp;Lynn C. Holley PhD, ACSW,&nbsp;Ijeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya PhD, MSW,&nbsp;Tonia Stott PhD, MSW,&nbsp;Ramona Denby PhD, MSW,&nbsp;Kristin M. Ferguson PhD, MSW","doi":"10.1111/cfs.13116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Unique service needs exist for expectant or parenting youth with foster care histories (EPY) and their families. Informed by Critical Ecological Systems Theory (CEST), this exploratory qualitative study presents findings from an inductive content analysis of in-depth interviews and focus groups with EPY and service providers. The study included nine in-depth face-to-face interviews with service providers (<i>n</i> = 5) and EPY (<i>n</i> = 4) as well as five focus groups with service providers (<i>n</i> = 23) and three with EPY (<i>n</i> = 7) to identify the characteristics of service providers, agencies and systems that may act as barriers to service utilization among EPY with a foster care history (<i>n =</i> 10) or juvenile justice history (<i>n</i> = 1). Service provider characteristics included negative attitudes towards EPY and/or those with child welfare experiences. Agency characteristics included a lack of workforce diversity, employee turnover, lack of training about diverse communities, restrictive enrolment processes and eligibility requirements, lack of childcare and transportation and limited accessibility of services. System characteristics included a lack of up-to-date information about existing services, territorialism, funding sources that do not prioritize interagency collaboration and a lack of communication/coordination among agencies. Implications include hiring and retaining a diverse workforce, providing training about diverse communities and implicit biases concerning young parents, developing navigation services specifically for EPY and developing processes for sharing data and communicating across systems that interact with EPY.</p>","PeriodicalId":10025,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Social Work","volume":"29 2","pages":"571-583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘You have to go hunting for information’: Barriers to service utilization among expectant and parenting youth with experience in foster care\",\"authors\":\"Kalah M. Villagrana PhD, MSW, MPA,&nbsp;Ann Turnlund Carver MSW,&nbsp;Lynn C. Holley PhD, ACSW,&nbsp;Ijeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya PhD, MSW,&nbsp;Tonia Stott PhD, MSW,&nbsp;Ramona Denby PhD, MSW,&nbsp;Kristin M. Ferguson PhD, MSW\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cfs.13116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Unique service needs exist for expectant or parenting youth with foster care histories (EPY) and their families. Informed by Critical Ecological Systems Theory (CEST), this exploratory qualitative study presents findings from an inductive content analysis of in-depth interviews and focus groups with EPY and service providers. The study included nine in-depth face-to-face interviews with service providers (<i>n</i> = 5) and EPY (<i>n</i> = 4) as well as five focus groups with service providers (<i>n</i> = 23) and three with EPY (<i>n</i> = 7) to identify the characteristics of service providers, agencies and systems that may act as barriers to service utilization among EPY with a foster care history (<i>n =</i> 10) or juvenile justice history (<i>n</i> = 1). Service provider characteristics included negative attitudes towards EPY and/or those with child welfare experiences. Agency characteristics included a lack of workforce diversity, employee turnover, lack of training about diverse communities, restrictive enrolment processes and eligibility requirements, lack of childcare and transportation and limited accessibility of services. System characteristics included a lack of up-to-date information about existing services, territorialism, funding sources that do not prioritize interagency collaboration and a lack of communication/coordination among agencies. Implications include hiring and retaining a diverse workforce, providing training about diverse communities and implicit biases concerning young parents, developing navigation services specifically for EPY and developing processes for sharing data and communicating across systems that interact with EPY.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"571-583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13116\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13116\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有寄养史的准父母青少年及其家庭有独特的服务需求。在关键生态系统理论(CEST)的指导下,本探索性定性研究通过对EPY和服务提供商的深度访谈和焦点小组进行归纳性内容分析,得出结论。该研究包括9个与服务提供者(n = 5)和EPY (n = 4)的深入面对面访谈,以及5个与服务提供者(n = 23)和3个与EPY (n = 7)的焦点小组,以确定服务提供者、机构和系统的特征,这些特征可能成为有寄养史(n = 10)或少年司法史(n = 1)的EPY利用服务的障碍。服务提供者的特征包括对环境服务及/或有儿童福利经验的服务提供者持消极态度。机构的特点包括劳动力缺乏多样性、员工流动、缺乏关于多样化社区的培训、限制性的注册程序和资格要求、缺乏儿童保育和交通以及服务的可及性有限。系统特征包括缺乏关于现有服务的最新信息、地域主义、资金来源不优先考虑机构间合作以及机构之间缺乏沟通/协调。其影响包括雇佣和留住多元化的劳动力,提供有关多元化社区和有关年轻父母的隐性偏见的培训,开发专门针对EPY的导航服务,以及开发与EPY交互的系统之间共享数据和通信的流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘You have to go hunting for information’: Barriers to service utilization among expectant and parenting youth with experience in foster care

Unique service needs exist for expectant or parenting youth with foster care histories (EPY) and their families. Informed by Critical Ecological Systems Theory (CEST), this exploratory qualitative study presents findings from an inductive content analysis of in-depth interviews and focus groups with EPY and service providers. The study included nine in-depth face-to-face interviews with service providers (n = 5) and EPY (n = 4) as well as five focus groups with service providers (n = 23) and three with EPY (n = 7) to identify the characteristics of service providers, agencies and systems that may act as barriers to service utilization among EPY with a foster care history (n = 10) or juvenile justice history (n = 1). Service provider characteristics included negative attitudes towards EPY and/or those with child welfare experiences. Agency characteristics included a lack of workforce diversity, employee turnover, lack of training about diverse communities, restrictive enrolment processes and eligibility requirements, lack of childcare and transportation and limited accessibility of services. System characteristics included a lack of up-to-date information about existing services, territorialism, funding sources that do not prioritize interagency collaboration and a lack of communication/coordination among agencies. Implications include hiring and retaining a diverse workforce, providing training about diverse communities and implicit biases concerning young parents, developing navigation services specifically for EPY and developing processes for sharing data and communicating across systems that interact with EPY.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Child and Family Social Work provides a forum where researchers, practitioners, policy-makers and managers in the field of child and family social work exchange knowledge, increase understanding and develop notions of good practice. In its promotion of research and practice, which is both disciplined and articulate, the Journal is dedicated to advancing the wellbeing and welfare of children and their families throughout the world. Child and Family Social Work publishes original and distinguished contributions on matters of research, theory, policy and practice in the field of social work with children and their families. The Journal gives international definition to the discipline and practice of child and family social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信