中枢性血容量丢失和复苏期间颈动脉校正流量时间与速度时间积分之间的相关性

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Isabel Kerrebijn, Chelsea E. Munding, Christine Horner, Sarah Atwi, M. Elfarnawany, A. Eibl, J. Eibl, Jenna L. Taylor, Chul Ho Kim, Bruce D. Johnson, Jon-Émile S. Kenny
{"title":"中枢性血容量丢失和复苏期间颈动脉校正流量时间与速度时间积分之间的相关性","authors":"Isabel Kerrebijn, Chelsea E. Munding, Christine Horner, Sarah Atwi, M. Elfarnawany, A. Eibl, J. Eibl, Jenna L. Taylor, Chul Ho Kim, Bruce D. Johnson, Jon-Émile S. Kenny","doi":"10.4103/jmu.jmu_80_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Doppler ultrasound of the common carotid artery is used to infer central hemodynamics. For example, change in the common carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFT) and velocity time integral (VTI) are proposed surrogates of changing stroke volume. However, conflicting data exist which may be due to inadequate beat sample size and measurement variability – both intrinsic to handheld systems. In this brief communication, we determined the correlation between changing ccFT and carotid VTI during progressively severe central blood volume loss and resuscitation.\n \n \n \n Measurements were obtained through a novel, wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound system. Sixteen participants (ages of 18–40 years with no previous medical history) were studied across 25 lower body-negative pressure protocols. Relationships were assessed using repeated-measures correlation regression models.\n \n \n \n In total, 33,110 cardiac cycles comprise this analysis; repeated-measures correlation showed a strong, linear relationship between ccFT and VTI. The strength of the ccFT-VTI relationship was dependent on the number of consecutively averaged cardiac cycles (R1 cycle = 0.70, R2 cycles = 0.74, and R10 cycles = 0.81).\n \n \n \n These results positively support future clinical investigations employing common carotid artery Doppler as a surrogate for central hemodynamics.\n","PeriodicalId":45466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Correlation between Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time and Velocity Time Integral during Central Blood Volume Loss and Resuscitation\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Kerrebijn, Chelsea E. Munding, Christine Horner, Sarah Atwi, M. Elfarnawany, A. Eibl, J. Eibl, Jenna L. Taylor, Chul Ho Kim, Bruce D. Johnson, Jon-Émile S. Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmu.jmu_80_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Doppler ultrasound of the common carotid artery is used to infer central hemodynamics. For example, change in the common carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFT) and velocity time integral (VTI) are proposed surrogates of changing stroke volume. However, conflicting data exist which may be due to inadequate beat sample size and measurement variability – both intrinsic to handheld systems. In this brief communication, we determined the correlation between changing ccFT and carotid VTI during progressively severe central blood volume loss and resuscitation.\\n \\n \\n \\n Measurements were obtained through a novel, wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound system. Sixteen participants (ages of 18–40 years with no previous medical history) were studied across 25 lower body-negative pressure protocols. Relationships were assessed using repeated-measures correlation regression models.\\n \\n \\n \\n In total, 33,110 cardiac cycles comprise this analysis; repeated-measures correlation showed a strong, linear relationship between ccFT and VTI. The strength of the ccFT-VTI relationship was dependent on the number of consecutively averaged cardiac cycles (R1 cycle = 0.70, R2 cycles = 0.74, and R10 cycles = 0.81).\\n \\n \\n \\n These results positively support future clinical investigations employing common carotid artery Doppler as a surrogate for central hemodynamics.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmu.jmu_80_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmu.jmu_80_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈总动脉的多普勒超声被用来推断中央血流动力学。例如,颈总动脉校正血流时间(ccFT)和速度时间积分(VTI)的变化被认为是脑卒中容量变化的替代指标。然而,存在相互矛盾的数据,这可能是由于不足的节拍样本量和测量可变性-这两者都是手持系统固有的。在这篇简短的文章中,我们确定了在逐渐严重的中央血容量减少和复苏过程中ccFT和颈动脉VTI变化之间的相关性。测量是通过一种新型的、无线的、可穿戴的多普勒超声系统获得的。16名参与者(年龄18-40岁,无既往病史)在25个低身体负压方案中进行了研究。使用重复测量相关回归模型评估关系。总共有33,110个心脏周期组成了这个分析;重复测量相关性显示ccFT和VTI之间存在强烈的线性关系。ccFT-VTI关系的强弱取决于连续平均心动周期数(R1周期= 0.70,R2周期= 0.74,R10周期= 0.81)。这些结果积极支持未来临床研究使用颈总动脉多普勒作为中央血流动力学的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Correlation between Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time and Velocity Time Integral during Central Blood Volume Loss and Resuscitation
Doppler ultrasound of the common carotid artery is used to infer central hemodynamics. For example, change in the common carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFT) and velocity time integral (VTI) are proposed surrogates of changing stroke volume. However, conflicting data exist which may be due to inadequate beat sample size and measurement variability – both intrinsic to handheld systems. In this brief communication, we determined the correlation between changing ccFT and carotid VTI during progressively severe central blood volume loss and resuscitation. Measurements were obtained through a novel, wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound system. Sixteen participants (ages of 18–40 years with no previous medical history) were studied across 25 lower body-negative pressure protocols. Relationships were assessed using repeated-measures correlation regression models. In total, 33,110 cardiac cycles comprise this analysis; repeated-measures correlation showed a strong, linear relationship between ccFT and VTI. The strength of the ccFT-VTI relationship was dependent on the number of consecutively averaged cardiac cycles (R1 cycle = 0.70, R2 cycles = 0.74, and R10 cycles = 0.81). These results positively support future clinical investigations employing common carotid artery Doppler as a surrogate for central hemodynamics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ultrasound
Journal of Medical Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
90
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Ultrasound is the peer-reviewed publication of the Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, and the Chinese Taipei Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. Its aim is to promote clinical and scientific research in ultrasonography, and to serve as a channel of communication among sonologists, sonographers, and medical ultrasound physicians in the Asia-Pacific region and wider international community. The Journal invites original contributions relating to the clinical and laboratory investigations and applications of ultrasonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信