Miguel Quesada López, L. Amaya Pascasio, Sara Blanco Madera, Jorge Pagola, Diana Vidal de Francisco, Elena de Celis Ruiz, Inmaculada Villegas Rodríguez, Joaquín Carneado-Ruiz, J. García‐Carmona, Juan Manuel García Torrecillas, Ana López Ferreiro, Iker Elosua Bayes, Ricardo Jaime Rigual Bobillo, María Isabel López López, Íñigo Esain González, María Dolores Ortega Ortega, Marina Blanco Ruiz, Irene Pérez Ortega, Carlos Lázaro Hernández, Blanca Fuentes Gimeno, A. Arjona Padillo, Patricia Martínez Sánchez
{"title":"预测缺血性卒中后心房颤动诊断的 SAFE 评分的外部验证:一项回顾性多中心研究","authors":"Miguel Quesada López, L. Amaya Pascasio, Sara Blanco Madera, Jorge Pagola, Diana Vidal de Francisco, Elena de Celis Ruiz, Inmaculada Villegas Rodríguez, Joaquín Carneado-Ruiz, J. García‐Carmona, Juan Manuel García Torrecillas, Ana López Ferreiro, Iker Elosua Bayes, Ricardo Jaime Rigual Bobillo, María Isabel López López, Íñigo Esain González, María Dolores Ortega Ortega, Marina Blanco Ruiz, Irene Pérez Ortega, Carlos Lázaro Hernández, Blanca Fuentes Gimeno, A. Arjona Padillo, Patricia Martínez Sánchez","doi":"10.1155/2023/6655772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) scale (SAFE score) was recently developed to provide a prediction of the diagnosis of AF after an ischemic stroke. It includes 7 items: \n \n a\n g\n e\n ≥\n 65\n \n years, bronchopathy, thyroid disease, cortical location of stroke, intracranial large vessel occlusion, NT-ProBNP ≥250 pg/mL, and left atrial enlargement. In the internal validation, a good performance was obtained, with an \n \n A\n U\n C\n =\n 0.88\n \n (95% CI 0.84-0.91) and sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 80%, respectively, for \n \n s\n c\n o\n r\n e\n s\n ≥\n 5\n \n . The aim of this study is the external validation of the SAFE score in a multicenter cohort. Methods. A retrospective multicenter study, including consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack between 2020 and 2022 with at least 24 hours of cardiac monitoring. Patients with previous AF or AF diagnosed on admission ECG were excluded. Results. Overall, 395 patients were recruited for analysis. The SAFE score obtained an \n \n A\n U\n C\n =\n 0.822\n \n (95% CI 0.778-0.866) with a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 65.4%, a positive predictive value of 44.1%, and a negative predictive value of 94.3% for a SAFE \n \n s\n c\n o\n r\n e\n ≥\n 5\n \n , with no significant gender differences. Calibration analysis in the external cohort showed an absence of significant differences between the observed values and those predicted by the model (Hosmer-Lemeshow’s test 0.089). Conclusions. The SAFE score showed adequate discriminative ability and calibration, so its external validation is justified. Further validations in other external cohorts or specific subpopulations of stroke patients might be required.","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":"119 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of SAFE Score to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis after Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Multicenter Study\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Quesada López, L. Amaya Pascasio, Sara Blanco Madera, Jorge Pagola, Diana Vidal de Francisco, Elena de Celis Ruiz, Inmaculada Villegas Rodríguez, Joaquín Carneado-Ruiz, J. García‐Carmona, Juan Manuel García Torrecillas, Ana López Ferreiro, Iker Elosua Bayes, Ricardo Jaime Rigual Bobillo, María Isabel López López, Íñigo Esain González, María Dolores Ortega Ortega, Marina Blanco Ruiz, Irene Pérez Ortega, Carlos Lázaro Hernández, Blanca Fuentes Gimeno, A. Arjona Padillo, Patricia Martínez Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/6655772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) scale (SAFE score) was recently developed to provide a prediction of the diagnosis of AF after an ischemic stroke. It includes 7 items: \\n \\n a\\n g\\n e\\n ≥\\n 65\\n \\n years, bronchopathy, thyroid disease, cortical location of stroke, intracranial large vessel occlusion, NT-ProBNP ≥250 pg/mL, and left atrial enlargement. In the internal validation, a good performance was obtained, with an \\n \\n A\\n U\\n C\\n =\\n 0.88\\n \\n (95% CI 0.84-0.91) and sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 80%, respectively, for \\n \\n s\\n c\\n o\\n r\\n e\\n s\\n ≥\\n 5\\n \\n . The aim of this study is the external validation of the SAFE score in a multicenter cohort. Methods. A retrospective multicenter study, including consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack between 2020 and 2022 with at least 24 hours of cardiac monitoring. Patients with previous AF or AF diagnosed on admission ECG were excluded. Results. Overall, 395 patients were recruited for analysis. The SAFE score obtained an \\n \\n A\\n U\\n C\\n =\\n 0.822\\n \\n (95% CI 0.778-0.866) with a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 65.4%, a positive predictive value of 44.1%, and a negative predictive value of 94.3% for a SAFE \\n \\n s\\n c\\n o\\n r\\n e\\n ≥\\n 5\\n \\n , with no significant gender differences. Calibration analysis in the external cohort showed an absence of significant differences between the observed values and those predicted by the model (Hosmer-Lemeshow’s test 0.089). Conclusions. The SAFE score showed adequate discriminative ability and calibration, so its external validation is justified. Further validations in other external cohorts or specific subpopulations of stroke patients might be required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"119 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6655772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6655772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。心房颤动(AF)量表(SAFE评分)的筛查是最近发展起来的,用于预测缺血性卒中后房颤的诊断。包括年龄≥65岁、支气管疾病、甲状腺疾病、脑卒中皮质定位、颅内大血管闭塞、NT-ProBNP≥250 pg/mL、左房增大7项。在内部验证中,获得了良好的性能,a - U - C = 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 ~ 0.91), s - C≥5的敏感性和特异性分别为83%和80%。本研究的目的是在多中心队列中对SAFE评分进行外部验证。方法。一项回顾性多中心研究,包括2020年至2022年间连续发生缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的患者,至少进行24小时心脏监测。排除既往有房颤或入院时心电图诊断为房颤的患者。结果。总共招募了395名患者进行分析。SAFE评分的A U C = 0.822 (95% CI 0.778-0.866),敏感性为87.2%,特异性为65.4%,阳性预测值为44.1%,阴性预测值为94.3%,≥5的SAFE评分无显著性别差异。外部队列的校准分析显示,观察值与模型预测值之间没有显著差异(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验0.089)。结论。该评分具有较好的判别能力和校正性,外部验证是合理的。可能需要在其他外部队列或特定脑卒中患者亚群中进行进一步验证。
External Validation of SAFE Score to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis after Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
Introduction. The screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) scale (SAFE score) was recently developed to provide a prediction of the diagnosis of AF after an ischemic stroke. It includes 7 items:
a
g
e
≥
65
years, bronchopathy, thyroid disease, cortical location of stroke, intracranial large vessel occlusion, NT-ProBNP ≥250 pg/mL, and left atrial enlargement. In the internal validation, a good performance was obtained, with an
A
U
C
=
0.88
(95% CI 0.84-0.91) and sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 80%, respectively, for
s
c
o
r
e
s
≥
5
. The aim of this study is the external validation of the SAFE score in a multicenter cohort. Methods. A retrospective multicenter study, including consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack between 2020 and 2022 with at least 24 hours of cardiac monitoring. Patients with previous AF or AF diagnosed on admission ECG were excluded. Results. Overall, 395 patients were recruited for analysis. The SAFE score obtained an
A
U
C
=
0.822
(95% CI 0.778-0.866) with a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 65.4%, a positive predictive value of 44.1%, and a negative predictive value of 94.3% for a SAFE
s
c
o
r
e
≥
5
, with no significant gender differences. Calibration analysis in the external cohort showed an absence of significant differences between the observed values and those predicted by the model (Hosmer-Lemeshow’s test 0.089). Conclusions. The SAFE score showed adequate discriminative ability and calibration, so its external validation is justified. Further validations in other external cohorts or specific subpopulations of stroke patients might be required.