心肌梗死后戒烟:亚美尼亚横断面调查的结果

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
V. Hayrumyan, A. Harutyunyan, T. Harutyunyan
{"title":"心肌梗死后戒烟:亚美尼亚横断面调查的结果","authors":"V. Hayrumyan, A. Harutyunyan, T. Harutyunyan","doi":"10.18332/tpc/174359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of smoking cessation in preventing myocardial infarction (MI) and reducing its recurrence, morbidity and mortality is well established. Only half of the patients quit or reduce smoking after hospitalization. The study examined smoking cessation practices and factors associated with it at 6–12 months after hospitalization among smoker patients diagnosed with MI. METHODS A cross-sectional survey (2016–2017) was conducted among smoker adult patients who were diagnosed with MI and were hospitalized at the largest cardiac hospital (Nork-Marash Medical Center) in Armenia. Data collection was conducted via medical record review and an interviewer-administered telephone survey (n=230). The patients were classified as non-quitters or quitters (those had not smoked even a puff within the past 30 days). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with smoking cessation at 6–12 months post-hospitalization addressing multicollinearity with two separate regression models. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 58.3 years and 98.3% were males. Though almost all MI patients attempted to quit, only 52.2% were successful abstainers at 6–12 months after hospitalization. Significant predictors of quitting included higher self-efficacy (AOR=1.07; 95% CI: 1.03–1.11, p<0.001), lower tobacco dependence (AOR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.66–1.00, p=0.050), not having family members who smoked (Model 1: AOR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.08–0.70, p=0.009; and Model 2: AOR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.09–0.67, p=0.006), having other hospitalization after MI due to heart disease (Model 1: AOR=5.42; 95% CI: 1.50–19.65, p=0.010; and Model 2: AOR=4.20; 95% CI: 1.32–13.31, p=0.015), higher number of household members (Model 1: AOR=1.83; 95% CI: 1.27–2.64, p=0.001; and Model 2: AOR=1.68; 95% CI: 1.20–2.35, p=0.002), and having at least one comorbidity (Model 1: AOR=4.20; 95% CI: 1.47–12.04, p=0.008; and Model 2: AOR=3.74; 95% CI: 1.40–9.97; p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS The study emphasized the need for integrating evidence-based cessation services and targeted help for hospitalized MI patients in Armenia. Interventions should aim to improve self-efficacy, effectively treat dependence, and consider patients’ social environment while providing cessation assistance.","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"11 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smoking cessation after myocardial infarction: Findings from a cross-sectional survey in Armenia\",\"authors\":\"V. Hayrumyan, A. Harutyunyan, T. Harutyunyan\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tpc/174359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of smoking cessation in preventing myocardial infarction (MI) and reducing its recurrence, morbidity and mortality is well established. Only half of the patients quit or reduce smoking after hospitalization. The study examined smoking cessation practices and factors associated with it at 6–12 months after hospitalization among smoker patients diagnosed with MI. METHODS A cross-sectional survey (2016–2017) was conducted among smoker adult patients who were diagnosed with MI and were hospitalized at the largest cardiac hospital (Nork-Marash Medical Center) in Armenia. Data collection was conducted via medical record review and an interviewer-administered telephone survey (n=230). The patients were classified as non-quitters or quitters (those had not smoked even a puff within the past 30 days). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with smoking cessation at 6–12 months post-hospitalization addressing multicollinearity with two separate regression models. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 58.3 years and 98.3% were males. Though almost all MI patients attempted to quit, only 52.2% were successful abstainers at 6–12 months after hospitalization. Significant predictors of quitting included higher self-efficacy (AOR=1.07; 95% CI: 1.03–1.11, p<0.001), lower tobacco dependence (AOR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.66–1.00, p=0.050), not having family members who smoked (Model 1: AOR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.08–0.70, p=0.009; and Model 2: AOR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.09–0.67, p=0.006), having other hospitalization after MI due to heart disease (Model 1: AOR=5.42; 95% CI: 1.50–19.65, p=0.010; and Model 2: AOR=4.20; 95% CI: 1.32–13.31, p=0.015), higher number of household members (Model 1: AOR=1.83; 95% CI: 1.27–2.64, p=0.001; and Model 2: AOR=1.68; 95% CI: 1.20–2.35, p=0.002), and having at least one comorbidity (Model 1: AOR=4.20; 95% CI: 1.47–12.04, p=0.008; and Model 2: AOR=3.74; 95% CI: 1.40–9.97; p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS The study emphasized the need for integrating evidence-based cessation services and targeted help for hospitalized MI patients in Armenia. Interventions should aim to improve self-efficacy, effectively treat dependence, and consider patients’ social environment while providing cessation assistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"volume\":\"11 34\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/174359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/174359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

戒烟在预防心肌梗死(MI)和减少其复发、发病率和死亡率方面的有效性已得到充分证实。只有一半的患者在住院后戒烟或减少吸烟。该研究调查了诊断为心肌梗死的吸烟者住院后6-12个月的戒烟行为及其相关因素。方法对在亚美尼亚最大的心脏医院(Nork-Marash医疗中心)诊断为心肌梗死并住院的成年吸烟者进行了横断面调查(2016-2017年)。数据收集通过病历回顾和访谈者管理的电话调查(n=230)进行。这些患者被分为非戒烟者和戒烟者(在过去30天内没有吸过一口烟)。多因素logistic回归分析用于检查住院后6-12个月戒烟相关因素,用两个独立的回归模型解决多重共线性问题。结果参与者平均年龄58.3岁,男性占98.3%。虽然几乎所有的心肌梗死患者都试图戒烟,但只有52.2%的患者在住院后6-12个月成功戒酒。戒烟的显著预测因素包括较高的自我效能感(AOR=1.07;95% CI: 1.03-1.11, p<0.001),较低的烟草依赖(AOR=0.81;95% CI: 0.66-1.00, p=0.050),没有家庭成员吸烟(模型1:AOR=0.24;95% CI: 0.08-0.70, p=0.009;模型2:AOR=0.24;95% CI: 0.09-0.67, p=0.006),心肌梗死后因心脏病住院的患者(模型1:AOR=5.42;95% CI: 1.50-19.65, p=0.010;模型2:AOR=4.20;95% CI: 1.32-13.31, p=0.015),较高的家庭成员数(模型1:AOR=1.83;95% CI: 1.27-2.64, p=0.001;模型2:AOR=1.68;95% CI: 1.20-2.35, p=0.002),且至少有一种合并症(模型1:AOR=4.20;95% CI: 1.47-12.04, p=0.008;模型2:AOR=3.74;95% ci: 1.40-9.97;p = 0.008)。结论:该研究强调了整合基于证据的戒烟服务和针对亚美尼亚住院心肌梗死患者的针对性帮助的必要性。干预措施应以提高自我效能感、有效治疗依赖为目标,在提供戒烟帮助的同时考虑患者的社会环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smoking cessation after myocardial infarction: Findings from a cross-sectional survey in Armenia
INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of smoking cessation in preventing myocardial infarction (MI) and reducing its recurrence, morbidity and mortality is well established. Only half of the patients quit or reduce smoking after hospitalization. The study examined smoking cessation practices and factors associated with it at 6–12 months after hospitalization among smoker patients diagnosed with MI. METHODS A cross-sectional survey (2016–2017) was conducted among smoker adult patients who were diagnosed with MI and were hospitalized at the largest cardiac hospital (Nork-Marash Medical Center) in Armenia. Data collection was conducted via medical record review and an interviewer-administered telephone survey (n=230). The patients were classified as non-quitters or quitters (those had not smoked even a puff within the past 30 days). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with smoking cessation at 6–12 months post-hospitalization addressing multicollinearity with two separate regression models. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 58.3 years and 98.3% were males. Though almost all MI patients attempted to quit, only 52.2% were successful abstainers at 6–12 months after hospitalization. Significant predictors of quitting included higher self-efficacy (AOR=1.07; 95% CI: 1.03–1.11, p<0.001), lower tobacco dependence (AOR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.66–1.00, p=0.050), not having family members who smoked (Model 1: AOR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.08–0.70, p=0.009; and Model 2: AOR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.09–0.67, p=0.006), having other hospitalization after MI due to heart disease (Model 1: AOR=5.42; 95% CI: 1.50–19.65, p=0.010; and Model 2: AOR=4.20; 95% CI: 1.32–13.31, p=0.015), higher number of household members (Model 1: AOR=1.83; 95% CI: 1.27–2.64, p=0.001; and Model 2: AOR=1.68; 95% CI: 1.20–2.35, p=0.002), and having at least one comorbidity (Model 1: AOR=4.20; 95% CI: 1.47–12.04, p=0.008; and Model 2: AOR=3.74; 95% CI: 1.40–9.97; p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS The study emphasized the need for integrating evidence-based cessation services and targeted help for hospitalized MI patients in Armenia. Interventions should aim to improve self-efficacy, effectively treat dependence, and consider patients’ social environment while providing cessation assistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信