利用深度学习识别农民对边际补贴和平均补贴变化的反应

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Hugo Storm, Thomas Heckelei, Kathy Baylis, Klaus Mittenzwei
{"title":"利用深度学习识别农民对边际补贴和平均补贴变化的反应","authors":"Hugo Storm,&nbsp;Thomas Heckelei,&nbsp;Kathy Baylis,&nbsp;Klaus Mittenzwei","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much of the developed world has adopted substantial, complex agricultural subsidy schemes in an attempt to produce desired rural livelihood and environmental outcomes. Understanding how farmers adjust their production activity in response to farm subsidies is crucial for setting optimal agricultural policy. Whereas standard economic theory suggests that farmers largely adjust production levels in response to prices and marginal subsidy rates, recent work in consumer behavior suggests that average (dis-)incentives may play a relevant role. We use a unique panel covering all farms applying for subsidies in Norway and a flexible deep-learning method to exploit kinks in the subsidy scheme to answer whether farmers respond more to average or marginal subsidies. In contrast to the standard economic theory of production, we find suggestive empirical evidence that farmers respond more to changes in average payments than to changes in marginal payments. We anticipate that our findings on the relevance of average payment levels for farmers' decision making may inspire further theoretical and empirical inquiries into agricultural policy effects. The study also highlights how novel deep-learning tools can be applied for detailed policy analysis and what advantages and challenges come with it. We believe that this approach has substantial potential for analysts and policymakers to evaluate and predict the impacts of policy options.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"106 4","pages":"1544-1567"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajae.12442","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying farmers' response to changes in marginal and average subsidies using deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Storm,&nbsp;Thomas Heckelei,&nbsp;Kathy Baylis,&nbsp;Klaus Mittenzwei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajae.12442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Much of the developed world has adopted substantial, complex agricultural subsidy schemes in an attempt to produce desired rural livelihood and environmental outcomes. Understanding how farmers adjust their production activity in response to farm subsidies is crucial for setting optimal agricultural policy. Whereas standard economic theory suggests that farmers largely adjust production levels in response to prices and marginal subsidy rates, recent work in consumer behavior suggests that average (dis-)incentives may play a relevant role. We use a unique panel covering all farms applying for subsidies in Norway and a flexible deep-learning method to exploit kinks in the subsidy scheme to answer whether farmers respond more to average or marginal subsidies. In contrast to the standard economic theory of production, we find suggestive empirical evidence that farmers respond more to changes in average payments than to changes in marginal payments. We anticipate that our findings on the relevance of average payment levels for farmers' decision making may inspire further theoretical and empirical inquiries into agricultural policy effects. The study also highlights how novel deep-learning tools can be applied for detailed policy analysis and what advantages and challenges come with it. We believe that this approach has substantial potential for analysts and policymakers to evaluate and predict the impacts of policy options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"106 4\",\"pages\":\"1544-1567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajae.12442\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多发达国家都采用了大量复杂的农业补贴计划,试图在农村生计和环境方面取得预期成果。了解农民如何根据农业补贴调整生产活动,对于制定最佳农业政策至关重要。标准的经济理论认为,农民主要是根据价格和边际补贴率来调整生产水平的,而最近在消费者行为方面的研究表明,平均(非)激励因素也可能起到相关作用。我们利用一个涵盖挪威所有申请补贴的农场的独特面板,以及一种灵活的深度学习方法,利用补贴计划中的弊端来回答农民对平均补贴还是边际补贴的反应更大。与标准的生产经济理论相反,我们发现了提示性的经验证据,即农民对平均补贴变化的反应大于对边际补贴变化的反应。我们预计,我们关于平均补贴水平与农民决策相关性的研究结果可能会激发对农业政策效应的进一步理论和实证研究。本研究还强调了如何将新型深度学习工具应用于详细的政策分析,以及由此带来的优势和挑战。我们相信,这种方法对于分析师和决策者评估和预测政策选择的影响具有巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifying farmers' response to changes in marginal and average subsidies using deep learning

Identifying farmers' response to changes in marginal and average subsidies using deep learning

Much of the developed world has adopted substantial, complex agricultural subsidy schemes in an attempt to produce desired rural livelihood and environmental outcomes. Understanding how farmers adjust their production activity in response to farm subsidies is crucial for setting optimal agricultural policy. Whereas standard economic theory suggests that farmers largely adjust production levels in response to prices and marginal subsidy rates, recent work in consumer behavior suggests that average (dis-)incentives may play a relevant role. We use a unique panel covering all farms applying for subsidies in Norway and a flexible deep-learning method to exploit kinks in the subsidy scheme to answer whether farmers respond more to average or marginal subsidies. In contrast to the standard economic theory of production, we find suggestive empirical evidence that farmers respond more to changes in average payments than to changes in marginal payments. We anticipate that our findings on the relevance of average payment levels for farmers' decision making may inspire further theoretical and empirical inquiries into agricultural policy effects. The study also highlights how novel deep-learning tools can be applied for detailed policy analysis and what advantages and challenges come with it. We believe that this approach has substantial potential for analysts and policymakers to evaluate and predict the impacts of policy options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信