基于团队的翻转课堂和传统学习在产前教育中心课程中的应用

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Yingying Lin, Xiaoyan Xiu, Juan Lin, Zhiwei Chen, Cui Xian Zheng, Xuehong Pan, Lihua Lin, Jianying Yan
{"title":"基于团队的翻转课堂和传统学习在产前教育中心课程中的应用","authors":"Yingying Lin, Xiaoyan Xiu, Juan Lin, Zhiwei Chen, Cui Xian Zheng, Xuehong Pan, Lihua Lin, Jianying Yan","doi":"10.2147/amep.s429806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> The goal is to evaluate the effects of a flipped class strategy on knowledge, self-directed learning ability, learning satisfaction and pregnancy outcomes in primiparas undergoing antenatal education.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A random sampling method was adopted. A total of 600 primiparas who were diagnosed with early pregnancy in a first-class hospital in southeast China and received continuous prenatal health education from May to July 2020 were selected as the research subjects. In order to make the baseline of the two groups of primipara comparable, we divided the two groups in the antenatal education centre according to the odd-even number of the lesson card number. The odd-numbered group was the experimental group, who used the prenatal health education model based on blended learning; the even-numbered group was the control group, who used the traditional mode of prenatal health education. The two groups were compared on the following outcomes: knowledge, self-directed learning ability, learning satisfaction and pregnancy outcomes.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Compared with traditional learning, the blended learning approach can effectively controlled the gestational weight gain (GWG), alleviated the anxiety and depression during pregnancy, improved the natural delivery rate of the primipara, shortened the delivery process and reduced the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), the difference was statistically significant (all <em>P</em>&lt; 0.05).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Blended learning may be an effective strategy because of its validity and practicality in antenatal education.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Team-Based Flipped Classroom and Traditional Learning on the Antenatal Education Center Course\",\"authors\":\"Yingying Lin, Xiaoyan Xiu, Juan Lin, Zhiwei Chen, Cui Xian Zheng, Xuehong Pan, Lihua Lin, Jianying Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/amep.s429806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> The goal is to evaluate the effects of a flipped class strategy on knowledge, self-directed learning ability, learning satisfaction and pregnancy outcomes in primiparas undergoing antenatal education.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A random sampling method was adopted. A total of 600 primiparas who were diagnosed with early pregnancy in a first-class hospital in southeast China and received continuous prenatal health education from May to July 2020 were selected as the research subjects. In order to make the baseline of the two groups of primipara comparable, we divided the two groups in the antenatal education centre according to the odd-even number of the lesson card number. The odd-numbered group was the experimental group, who used the prenatal health education model based on blended learning; the even-numbered group was the control group, who used the traditional mode of prenatal health education. The two groups were compared on the following outcomes: knowledge, self-directed learning ability, learning satisfaction and pregnancy outcomes.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Compared with traditional learning, the blended learning approach can effectively controlled the gestational weight gain (GWG), alleviated the anxiety and depression during pregnancy, improved the natural delivery rate of the primipara, shortened the delivery process and reduced the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), the difference was statistically significant (all <em>P</em>&lt; 0.05).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Blended learning may be an effective strategy because of its validity and practicality in antenatal education.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s429806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s429806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的是评估翻转课堂策略对初产妇接受产前教育的知识、自主学习能力、学习满意度和妊娠结局的影响:目的:评估翻转课堂策略对接受产前教育的初产妇的知识、自主学习能力、学习满意度和妊娠结局的影响:方法:采用随机抽样方法。方法:采用随机抽样的方法,选取中国东南地区某一级甲等医院确诊为早孕并在 2020 年 5 月至 7 月期间接受连续产前健康教育的初产妇共 600 人作为研究对象。为了使两组初产妇的基线具有可比性,我们在产前教育中心按课卡号的奇偶数将两组初产妇进行了划分。单数组为实验组,采用基于混合式学习的产前健康教育模式;双数组为对照组,采用传统的产前健康教育模式。两组在以下方面进行了比较:知识、自主学习能力、学习满意度和妊娠结局:结果:与传统学习方式相比,混合学习方式能有效控制妊娠体重增加(GWG),缓解孕期焦虑和抑郁,提高初产妇自然分娩率,缩短分娩过程,降低妊娠糖尿病(GDM)风险,差异有统计学意义(均P< 0.05):混合式学习因其在产前教育中的有效性和实用性,可能是一种有效的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Team-Based Flipped Classroom and Traditional Learning on the Antenatal Education Center Course
Background: The goal is to evaluate the effects of a flipped class strategy on knowledge, self-directed learning ability, learning satisfaction and pregnancy outcomes in primiparas undergoing antenatal education.
Methods: A random sampling method was adopted. A total of 600 primiparas who were diagnosed with early pregnancy in a first-class hospital in southeast China and received continuous prenatal health education from May to July 2020 were selected as the research subjects. In order to make the baseline of the two groups of primipara comparable, we divided the two groups in the antenatal education centre according to the odd-even number of the lesson card number. The odd-numbered group was the experimental group, who used the prenatal health education model based on blended learning; the even-numbered group was the control group, who used the traditional mode of prenatal health education. The two groups were compared on the following outcomes: knowledge, self-directed learning ability, learning satisfaction and pregnancy outcomes.
Results: Compared with traditional learning, the blended learning approach can effectively controlled the gestational weight gain (GWG), alleviated the anxiety and depression during pregnancy, improved the natural delivery rate of the primipara, shortened the delivery process and reduced the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), the difference was statistically significant (all P< 0.05).
Conclusion: Blended learning may be an effective strategy because of its validity and practicality in antenatal education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信