2019 年冠状病毒疾病全程接种和加强接种 mRNA 疫苗对δ期和Ω期疾病严重程度的实际效果:利用日本全国登记数据进行倾向得分匹配队列研究

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Tetsuya Suzuki , Yusuke Asai , Shinya Tsuzuki , Hidetoshi Nomoto , Nobuaki Matsunaga , Eiichi N. Kodama , Kayoko Hayakawa , Norio Ohmagari
{"title":"2019 年冠状病毒疾病全程接种和加强接种 mRNA 疫苗对δ期和Ω期疾病严重程度的实际效果:利用日本全国登记数据进行倾向得分匹配队列研究","authors":"Tetsuya Suzuki ,&nbsp;Yusuke Asai ,&nbsp;Shinya Tsuzuki ,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Nomoto ,&nbsp;Nobuaki Matsunaga ,&nbsp;Eiichi N. Kodama ,&nbsp;Kayoko Hayakawa ,&nbsp;Norio Ohmagari","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To date, few studies from the Asian region have reported the effectiveness of messenger ribonucleic acid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines against disease progression and death after hospitalization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We evaluated the data from the COVID-19 registry in Japan during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases. A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted between the incompletely (0–1 dose) and fully (2 doses) vaccinated groups during the delta-dominant phase and among the incompletely, fully, and booster (3 doses) vaccinated groups during the omicron-dominant phase.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the delta-dominant phase, 411 pairs were matched. The fully vaccinated group showed a significantly lower oxygen supplementation rate (24.1 % vs. 41.1 %, p &lt; 0.001) but little difference in the mortality rate (2.2 % vs. 2.9 %, p = 0.66). In the omicron-dominant phase, 1494 pairs from the incompletely and fully vaccinated groups, and 425 pairs from the fully and booster vaccinated groups were matched. Full vaccination reduced both the oxygen supplementation rate (18.6 % vs 25.7 %, p &lt; 0.001) and mortality rate (0.7 % vs 2.3 %, p &lt; 0.001). Booster vaccination showed little difference in either the rate of oxygen supplementation (21.2 % vs. 24.7 %, p = 0.25) or mortality (1.2 % vs. 2.6 %, p = 0.21) compared with full vaccination.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Full vaccination reduced disease severity during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases; booster vaccination did not further enhance the protective effects against disease progression during the omicron-dominant phase compared to full vaccination. Future vaccine strategies and policy decisions should consider preventing infection or disease progression in the target population, as well as the characteristics of the dominant variant in that phase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":"57 1","pages":"Pages 20-29"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118223002165/pdfft?md5=fc71b376b26e3d4718cf2f879f556244&pid=1-s2.0-S1684118223002165-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness of full and booster mRNA vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 against disease severity during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases: A propensity score-matched cohort study using the nationwide registry data in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuya Suzuki ,&nbsp;Yusuke Asai ,&nbsp;Shinya Tsuzuki ,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Nomoto ,&nbsp;Nobuaki Matsunaga ,&nbsp;Eiichi N. Kodama ,&nbsp;Kayoko Hayakawa ,&nbsp;Norio Ohmagari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmii.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To date, few studies from the Asian region have reported the effectiveness of messenger ribonucleic acid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines against disease progression and death after hospitalization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We evaluated the data from the COVID-19 registry in Japan during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases. A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted between the incompletely (0–1 dose) and fully (2 doses) vaccinated groups during the delta-dominant phase and among the incompletely, fully, and booster (3 doses) vaccinated groups during the omicron-dominant phase.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the delta-dominant phase, 411 pairs were matched. The fully vaccinated group showed a significantly lower oxygen supplementation rate (24.1 % vs. 41.1 %, p &lt; 0.001) but little difference in the mortality rate (2.2 % vs. 2.9 %, p = 0.66). In the omicron-dominant phase, 1494 pairs from the incompletely and fully vaccinated groups, and 425 pairs from the fully and booster vaccinated groups were matched. Full vaccination reduced both the oxygen supplementation rate (18.6 % vs 25.7 %, p &lt; 0.001) and mortality rate (0.7 % vs 2.3 %, p &lt; 0.001). Booster vaccination showed little difference in either the rate of oxygen supplementation (21.2 % vs. 24.7 %, p = 0.25) or mortality (1.2 % vs. 2.6 %, p = 0.21) compared with full vaccination.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Full vaccination reduced disease severity during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases; booster vaccination did not further enhance the protective effects against disease progression during the omicron-dominant phase compared to full vaccination. Future vaccine strategies and policy decisions should consider preventing infection or disease progression in the target population, as well as the characteristics of the dominant variant in that phase.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 20-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118223002165/pdfft?md5=fc71b376b26e3d4718cf2f879f556244&pid=1-s2.0-S1684118223002165-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118223002165\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118223002165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景迄今为止,亚洲地区很少有研究报告信使核糖核酸冠状病毒疾病2019(COVID-19)疫苗对疾病进展和住院后死亡的有效性。在δ主导阶段,在未完全接种组(0-1剂)和完全接种组(2剂)之间进行了倾向得分匹配队列研究;在ω主导阶段,在未完全接种组、完全接种组和加强接种组(3剂)之间进行了倾向得分匹配队列研究。完全接种组的补氧率明显较低(24.1% 对 41.1%,p<0.001),但死亡率差异不大(2.2% 对 2.9%,p=0.66)。在欧米伽马主导阶段,来自未完全接种组和完全接种组的 1,494 对以及来自完全接种组和加强接种组的 425 对进行了配对。完全接种降低了补氧率(18.6% 对 25.7%,p<0.001)和死亡率(0.7% 对 2.3%,p<0.001)。与全程接种相比,加强免疫在氧气补充率(21.2% vs. 24.7%,p=0.25)或死亡率(1.2% vs. 2.6%,p=0.21)方面几乎没有差异。结论全程接种可降低δ-和Ω-主导阶段的疾病严重程度;与全程接种相比,加强免疫并未进一步增强Ω-主导阶段对疾病进展的保护作用。未来的疫苗策略和政策决定应考虑预防目标人群的感染或疾病进展,以及该阶段优势变异体的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world effectiveness of full and booster mRNA vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 against disease severity during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases: A propensity score-matched cohort study using the nationwide registry data in Japan

Background

To date, few studies from the Asian region have reported the effectiveness of messenger ribonucleic acid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines against disease progression and death after hospitalization.

Methods

We evaluated the data from the COVID-19 registry in Japan during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases. A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted between the incompletely (0–1 dose) and fully (2 doses) vaccinated groups during the delta-dominant phase and among the incompletely, fully, and booster (3 doses) vaccinated groups during the omicron-dominant phase.

Results

In the delta-dominant phase, 411 pairs were matched. The fully vaccinated group showed a significantly lower oxygen supplementation rate (24.1 % vs. 41.1 %, p < 0.001) but little difference in the mortality rate (2.2 % vs. 2.9 %, p = 0.66). In the omicron-dominant phase, 1494 pairs from the incompletely and fully vaccinated groups, and 425 pairs from the fully and booster vaccinated groups were matched. Full vaccination reduced both the oxygen supplementation rate (18.6 % vs 25.7 %, p < 0.001) and mortality rate (0.7 % vs 2.3 %, p < 0.001). Booster vaccination showed little difference in either the rate of oxygen supplementation (21.2 % vs. 24.7 %, p = 0.25) or mortality (1.2 % vs. 2.6 %, p = 0.21) compared with full vaccination.

Conclusions

Full vaccination reduced disease severity during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases; booster vaccination did not further enhance the protective effects against disease progression during the omicron-dominant phase compared to full vaccination. Future vaccine strategies and policy decisions should consider preventing infection or disease progression in the target population, as well as the characteristics of the dominant variant in that phase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信