{"title":"不确定性和分歧的周期性","authors":"Osnat Zohar","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The empirical literature often uses disagreement (dispersion in forecasts) as a proxy for uncertainty, yet disagreement and uncertainty behave differently throughout the business cycle. The difference is especially salient in non-crisis periods, in which measures of disagreement are positively correlated with growth, while measures of uncertainty are negatively correlated with it. I explain this finding using a noisy information model with endogenous learning. In the model, agents observe noisy private information, but only when they are active. Holding uncertainty fixed, a rise in activity introduces noisy information to the market, and agents’ beliefs diverge, i.e., disagreement rises.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 103544"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyclicality of uncertainty and disagreement\",\"authors\":\"Osnat Zohar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The empirical literature often uses disagreement (dispersion in forecasts) as a proxy for uncertainty, yet disagreement and uncertainty behave differently throughout the business cycle. The difference is especially salient in non-crisis periods, in which measures of disagreement are positively correlated with growth, while measures of uncertainty are negatively correlated with it. I explain this finding using a noisy information model with endogenous learning. In the model, agents observe noisy private information, but only when they are active. Holding uncertainty fixed, a rise in activity introduces noisy information to the market, and agents’ beliefs diverge, i.e., disagreement rises.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Monetary Economics\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Monetary Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304393223001526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Monetary Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304393223001526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The empirical literature often uses disagreement (dispersion in forecasts) as a proxy for uncertainty, yet disagreement and uncertainty behave differently throughout the business cycle. The difference is especially salient in non-crisis periods, in which measures of disagreement are positively correlated with growth, while measures of uncertainty are negatively correlated with it. I explain this finding using a noisy information model with endogenous learning. In the model, agents observe noisy private information, but only when they are active. Holding uncertainty fixed, a rise in activity introduces noisy information to the market, and agents’ beliefs diverge, i.e., disagreement rises.
期刊介绍:
The profession has witnessed over the past twenty years a remarkable expansion of research activities bearing on problems in the broader field of monetary economics. The strong interest in monetary analysis has been increasingly matched in recent years by the growing attention to the working and structure of financial institutions. The role of various institutional arrangements, the consequences of specific changes in banking structure and the welfare aspects of structural policies have attracted an increasing interest in the profession. There has also been a growing attention to the operation of credit markets and to various aspects in the behavior of rates of return on assets. The Journal of Monetary Economics provides a specialized forum for the publication of this research.