南卡罗来纳州不同边缘化人群中人类斑疹热立克次体血清流行率及相关流行病学因素

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lídia Gual-Gonzalez , Stella C.W. Self , Madeleine Meyer , Omar Cantillo-Barraza , Myriam E. Torres , Melissa S. Nolan
{"title":"南卡罗来纳州不同边缘化人群中人类斑疹热立克次体血清流行率及相关流行病学因素","authors":"Lídia Gual-Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Stella C.W. Self ,&nbsp;Madeleine Meyer ,&nbsp;Omar Cantillo-Barraza ,&nbsp;Myriam E. Torres ,&nbsp;Melissa S. Nolan","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Illness caused by spotted fever group <em>Rickettsia</em> (SFGR) is increasing nationally, with affluent, white residents most likely to be diagnosed. The common under-representativeness of marginalized populations in research studies and these vulnerable populations’ health inequities make veritable epidemiologic risk factor profiling challenging, which inhibits equitable public health intervention. The current study leveraged 749 banked sera and associated surveys from a cross-sectional minority-represented COVID-19 study to perform an SFGR seroprevalence investigation. SFGR titers (1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, and 1:1024) were measured using commercially available indirect fluorescent antibody slides—SFGR positive cases were defined as titers ≥1:128. Multivariable logistic regression and Getis-Ord-Gi* hotspot analyses were used to identify seropositivity-associated factors and determine seropositive clusters. Among a mostly minority and lower socioeconomic population, a 3.4 % SFGR seropositivity was noted at the ≥1:128 titer level. Male gender (Odds Ratio (OR): 3.20; adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)s: 3.73), age (aOR: 1.05), any frequency of tick bite (OR: 2.29), and spending time working outdoors (OR: 5.05) were associated with SFGR IgG seropositivity. Moreover, the geospatial analysis showed clusters of seropositivity in areas where previous case reports occurred, suggesting potential endemic foci.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"15 2","pages":"Article 102288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001693/pdfft?md5=603c77d01eee355e61be9b40e1809c27&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X23001693-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human spotted fever group Rickettsia seroprevalence and associated epidemiologic factors among diverse, marginalized populations in South Carolina\",\"authors\":\"Lídia Gual-Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Stella C.W. Self ,&nbsp;Madeleine Meyer ,&nbsp;Omar Cantillo-Barraza ,&nbsp;Myriam E. Torres ,&nbsp;Melissa S. Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Illness caused by spotted fever group <em>Rickettsia</em> (SFGR) is increasing nationally, with affluent, white residents most likely to be diagnosed. The common under-representativeness of marginalized populations in research studies and these vulnerable populations’ health inequities make veritable epidemiologic risk factor profiling challenging, which inhibits equitable public health intervention. The current study leveraged 749 banked sera and associated surveys from a cross-sectional minority-represented COVID-19 study to perform an SFGR seroprevalence investigation. SFGR titers (1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, and 1:1024) were measured using commercially available indirect fluorescent antibody slides—SFGR positive cases were defined as titers ≥1:128. Multivariable logistic regression and Getis-Ord-Gi* hotspot analyses were used to identify seropositivity-associated factors and determine seropositive clusters. Among a mostly minority and lower socioeconomic population, a 3.4 % SFGR seropositivity was noted at the ≥1:128 titer level. Male gender (Odds Ratio (OR): 3.20; adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)s: 3.73), age (aOR: 1.05), any frequency of tick bite (OR: 2.29), and spending time working outdoors (OR: 5.05) were associated with SFGR IgG seropositivity. Moreover, the geospatial analysis showed clusters of seropositivity in areas where previous case reports occurred, suggesting potential endemic foci.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001693/pdfft?md5=603c77d01eee355e61be9b40e1809c27&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X23001693-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001693\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斑点热立克次体(SFGR)引起的疾病在全国范围内呈上升趋势,富裕的白人居民最有可能被确诊。边缘化人群在研究中的代表性普遍不足,而且这些弱势群体的健康状况不平等,这使得进行真正的流行病学风险因素分析具有挑战性,从而阻碍了公平的公共卫生干预。本研究利用 749 份银行血清和 COVID-19 少数民族横断面研究中的相关调查,对 SFGR 血清流行率进行了调查。使用市售间接荧光抗体载玻片测量 SFGR 滴度(1:64、1:128、1:256、1:512 和 1:1024)--滴度≥1:128 即为 SFGR 阳性病例。多变量逻辑回归和Getis-Ord-Gi*热点分析用于确定血清阳性相关因素并确定血清阳性群组。在大多数少数民族和社会经济地位较低的人群中,滴度≥1:128 的 SFGR 血清阳性率为 3.4%。男性性别(比值比(OR):3.20;调整比值比(OR):3.20):3.20;调整后的比值比 (aOR)s:3.73):3.73)、年龄(aOR:1.05)、蜱叮咬频率(OR:2.29)和户外工作时间(OR:5.05)与 SFGR IgG 血清阳性相关。此外,地理空间分析表明,在以前有病例报告的地区出现了血清阳性群,这表明可能存在流行病疫点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human spotted fever group Rickettsia seroprevalence and associated epidemiologic factors among diverse, marginalized populations in South Carolina

Illness caused by spotted fever group Rickettsia (SFGR) is increasing nationally, with affluent, white residents most likely to be diagnosed. The common under-representativeness of marginalized populations in research studies and these vulnerable populations’ health inequities make veritable epidemiologic risk factor profiling challenging, which inhibits equitable public health intervention. The current study leveraged 749 banked sera and associated surveys from a cross-sectional minority-represented COVID-19 study to perform an SFGR seroprevalence investigation. SFGR titers (1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, and 1:1024) were measured using commercially available indirect fluorescent antibody slides—SFGR positive cases were defined as titers ≥1:128. Multivariable logistic regression and Getis-Ord-Gi* hotspot analyses were used to identify seropositivity-associated factors and determine seropositive clusters. Among a mostly minority and lower socioeconomic population, a 3.4 % SFGR seropositivity was noted at the ≥1:128 titer level. Male gender (Odds Ratio (OR): 3.20; adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)s: 3.73), age (aOR: 1.05), any frequency of tick bite (OR: 2.29), and spending time working outdoors (OR: 5.05) were associated with SFGR IgG seropositivity. Moreover, the geospatial analysis showed clusters of seropositivity in areas where previous case reports occurred, suggesting potential endemic foci.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials. The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信