不同鸟类分布范围的种群对栖息地丧失和碎片化的反应不同:对保护策略的影响

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Érica Hasui , Alexandre Camargo Martensen , Alexandre Uezu , Rafael Guerra Pimentel , Flavio Nunes Ramos , Milton Cezar Ribeiro , Jean Paul Metzger
{"title":"不同鸟类分布范围的种群对栖息地丧失和碎片化的反应不同:对保护策略的影响","authors":"Érica Hasui ,&nbsp;Alexandre Camargo Martensen ,&nbsp;Alexandre Uezu ,&nbsp;Rafael Guerra Pimentel ,&nbsp;Flavio Nunes Ramos ,&nbsp;Milton Cezar Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Jean Paul Metzger","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conservation strategies often assume uniform response to habitat loss and fragmentation among species. We investigated whether bird species' responses to habitat changes vary based on their distribution range and local environmental suitability. Additionally, we explored associations between sensitivity responses and species traits, like dispersal ability, habitat specialization, and distribution range size. Our study focused on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, encompassing 179 landscape sites and 81 bird species. Using additive and interactive relationships and used principal component analysis to correlate species traits with sensitivity patterns. We found four distinct patterns of population sensitivity patterns: no effect of geographical range or environmental suitability (21% of the species), higher sensitivity at the geographical edges or low suitability (14%), lower sensitivity in core or better areas (11%) or both extremes responding similarly (11%), with species showing no response to landscape changes (43%). Biogeographic and landscape factors interactively influenced population abundance, resulting in antagonistic or synergistic effects. Population responses to habitat loss and fragmentation varied based on range position or environmental suitability but weren’t consistently explained by species traits. Given these nuanced results, conservationists must refrain from generalizing species sensitivity without accounting for distribution range position and environmental suitability. To ensure the long-term survival of biodiversity, conservation efforts should be tailored to each species' specific needs, taking into account their spatial position and the synergistic or antagonistic effects of environmental stressors. Such targeted conservation efforts will be crucial in mitigating the impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation on bird populations within the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"22 1","pages":"Pages 43-54"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000743/pdfft?md5=7b8f8b868dcd0c6d3a3818a0e13192ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064423000743-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Populations across bird species distribution ranges respond differently to habitat loss and fragmentation: implications for conservation strategies\",\"authors\":\"Érica Hasui ,&nbsp;Alexandre Camargo Martensen ,&nbsp;Alexandre Uezu ,&nbsp;Rafael Guerra Pimentel ,&nbsp;Flavio Nunes Ramos ,&nbsp;Milton Cezar Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Jean Paul Metzger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Conservation strategies often assume uniform response to habitat loss and fragmentation among species. We investigated whether bird species' responses to habitat changes vary based on their distribution range and local environmental suitability. Additionally, we explored associations between sensitivity responses and species traits, like dispersal ability, habitat specialization, and distribution range size. Our study focused on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, encompassing 179 landscape sites and 81 bird species. Using additive and interactive relationships and used principal component analysis to correlate species traits with sensitivity patterns. We found four distinct patterns of population sensitivity patterns: no effect of geographical range or environmental suitability (21% of the species), higher sensitivity at the geographical edges or low suitability (14%), lower sensitivity in core or better areas (11%) or both extremes responding similarly (11%), with species showing no response to landscape changes (43%). Biogeographic and landscape factors interactively influenced population abundance, resulting in antagonistic or synergistic effects. Population responses to habitat loss and fragmentation varied based on range position or environmental suitability but weren’t consistently explained by species traits. Given these nuanced results, conservationists must refrain from generalizing species sensitivity without accounting for distribution range position and environmental suitability. To ensure the long-term survival of biodiversity, conservation efforts should be tailored to each species' specific needs, taking into account their spatial position and the synergistic or antagonistic effects of environmental stressors. Such targeted conservation efforts will be crucial in mitigating the impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation on bird populations within the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000743/pdfft?md5=7b8f8b868dcd0c6d3a3818a0e13192ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064423000743-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000743\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护策略通常假定对物种间栖息地丧失和破碎化的统一响应。研究了鸟类对栖息地变化的响应是否因其分布范围和当地环境适宜性而异。此外,我们还探讨了敏感性反应与物种特征之间的关系,如扩散能力、栖息地专业化和分布范围大小。我们的研究重点是巴西大西洋森林,包括179个景观点和81种鸟类。利用加性关系和交互关系,利用主成分分析方法将物种性状与敏感性模式进行关联。种群敏感性模式有四种不同的模式:不受地理范围或环境适宜性的影响(21%),地理边缘的敏感性较高或适宜性较低(14%),核心或较好地区的敏感性较低(11%)或两者极端响应相似(11%),物种对景观变化没有响应(43%)。生物地理因子和景观因子对种群丰度的影响具有拮抗或协同效应。种群对栖息地丧失和破碎化的响应因范围位置或环境适宜性而异,但不能一致地用物种特征来解释。考虑到这些微妙的结果,自然资源保护主义者必须避免在没有考虑分布范围、位置和环境适宜性的情况下概括物种敏感性。为了确保生物多样性的长期生存,保护工作应根据每个物种的具体需要,考虑其空间位置和环境压力因素的协同或拮抗作用。这种有针对性的保护工作对于减轻栖息地丧失和破碎化对巴西大西洋森林内鸟类种群的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Populations across bird species distribution ranges respond differently to habitat loss and fragmentation: implications for conservation strategies

Populations across bird species distribution ranges respond differently to habitat loss and fragmentation: implications for conservation strategies

Populations across bird species distribution ranges respond differently to habitat loss and fragmentation: implications for conservation strategies

Conservation strategies often assume uniform response to habitat loss and fragmentation among species. We investigated whether bird species' responses to habitat changes vary based on their distribution range and local environmental suitability. Additionally, we explored associations between sensitivity responses and species traits, like dispersal ability, habitat specialization, and distribution range size. Our study focused on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, encompassing 179 landscape sites and 81 bird species. Using additive and interactive relationships and used principal component analysis to correlate species traits with sensitivity patterns. We found four distinct patterns of population sensitivity patterns: no effect of geographical range or environmental suitability (21% of the species), higher sensitivity at the geographical edges or low suitability (14%), lower sensitivity in core or better areas (11%) or both extremes responding similarly (11%), with species showing no response to landscape changes (43%). Biogeographic and landscape factors interactively influenced population abundance, resulting in antagonistic or synergistic effects. Population responses to habitat loss and fragmentation varied based on range position or environmental suitability but weren’t consistently explained by species traits. Given these nuanced results, conservationists must refrain from generalizing species sensitivity without accounting for distribution range position and environmental suitability. To ensure the long-term survival of biodiversity, conservation efforts should be tailored to each species' specific needs, taking into account their spatial position and the synergistic or antagonistic effects of environmental stressors. Such targeted conservation efforts will be crucial in mitigating the impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation on bird populations within the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信