使用Petri网测量古代技术复杂性及其认知含义

Sebastian Fajardo, Paul R. B. Kozowyk, Geeske H. J. Langejans
{"title":"使用Petri网测量古代技术复杂性及其认知含义","authors":"Sebastian Fajardo, Paul R. B. Kozowyk, Geeske H. J. Langejans","doi":"arxiv-2305.09751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We implement a method from computer sciences to address a challenge in\nPaleolithic archaeology: how to infer cognition differences from material\nculture. Archaeological material culture is linked to cognition: more complex\nancient technologies are assumed to have required complex cognition. We present\nan application of Petri net analysis to compare Neanderthal tar production\ntechnologies and tie the results to cognitive requirements. We applied three\ncomplexity metrics, each relying on their own unique definitions of complexity,\nto the modelled production sequences. Based on the results, we suggest that\nNeanderthal working memory requirements may have been similar to human\npreferences regarding working memory use today. This method also enables us to\ndistinguish the high-order cognitive functions combining traits like planning,\ninhibitory control, and learnings that were likely required by different\nancient technological processes. The Petri net approach can contribute to our\nunderstanding of technology and cognitive evolution as it can be used on\ndifferent materials and technologies, across time and species.","PeriodicalId":501310,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring ancient technological complexity and its cognitive implications using Petri nets\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Fajardo, Paul R. B. Kozowyk, Geeske H. J. Langejans\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2305.09751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We implement a method from computer sciences to address a challenge in\\nPaleolithic archaeology: how to infer cognition differences from material\\nculture. Archaeological material culture is linked to cognition: more complex\\nancient technologies are assumed to have required complex cognition. We present\\nan application of Petri net analysis to compare Neanderthal tar production\\ntechnologies and tie the results to cognitive requirements. We applied three\\ncomplexity metrics, each relying on their own unique definitions of complexity,\\nto the modelled production sequences. Based on the results, we suggest that\\nNeanderthal working memory requirements may have been similar to human\\npreferences regarding working memory use today. This method also enables us to\\ndistinguish the high-order cognitive functions combining traits like planning,\\ninhibitory control, and learnings that were likely required by different\\nancient technological processes. The Petri net approach can contribute to our\\nunderstanding of technology and cognitive evolution as it can be used on\\ndifferent materials and technologies, across time and species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2305.09751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2305.09751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们实现了一种计算机科学方法来解决旧石器时代考古学中的一个挑战:如何从物质文化中推断认知差异。考古物质文化与认知有关:更复杂的古代技术被认为需要复杂的认知。我们提出了一个应用Petri网分析来比较尼安德特人的焦油生产技术,并将结果与认知需求联系起来。我们将三种复杂性度量标准应用于建模的生产序列,每一种都依赖于它们自己独特的复杂性定义。基于这些结果,我们认为尼安德特人对工作记忆的要求可能与今天人类对工作记忆使用的偏好相似。这种方法还使我们能够区分高阶认知功能,这些功能结合了计划、抑制控制和学习等特征,这些特征可能是不同古代技术过程所需要的。Petri网方法可以帮助我们理解技术和认知进化,因为它可以用于不同的材料和技术,跨越时间和物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring ancient technological complexity and its cognitive implications using Petri nets
We implement a method from computer sciences to address a challenge in Paleolithic archaeology: how to infer cognition differences from material culture. Archaeological material culture is linked to cognition: more complex ancient technologies are assumed to have required complex cognition. We present an application of Petri net analysis to compare Neanderthal tar production technologies and tie the results to cognitive requirements. We applied three complexity metrics, each relying on their own unique definitions of complexity, to the modelled production sequences. Based on the results, we suggest that Neanderthal working memory requirements may have been similar to human preferences regarding working memory use today. This method also enables us to distinguish the high-order cognitive functions combining traits like planning, inhibitory control, and learnings that were likely required by different ancient technological processes. The Petri net approach can contribute to our understanding of technology and cognitive evolution as it can be used on different materials and technologies, across time and species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信