mri的能量消耗:决定因素和管理选择

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mateusz Chodorowski , Julien Ognard , Àlex Rovira , Jean-Christophe Gentric , David Bourhis , Douraied Ben Salem
{"title":"mri的能量消耗:决定因素和管理选择","authors":"Mateusz Chodorowski ,&nbsp;Julien Ognard ,&nbsp;Àlex Rovira ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Gentric ,&nbsp;David Bourhis ,&nbsp;Douraied Ben Salem","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Energy consumption awareness is a known concern, and radiology departments have energy-intensive consuming machines. The means of energy consumption management in MRI scanners have yet to be evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To measure the MRI energy consumption and to evaluate the means to reduce it.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Data was retrieved for two MRI scanners through the hospital's automated energy consumption measurement software. After correlation with picture archiving and communication system (PACS) files, they were segmented by machine and mode (as follows: stand-by, idle and active) and analyzed. Active mode data for a specific brain MRI protocol have been isolated, and equivalent low energy consuming protocol was made. Both were performed on phantom and compared. Same protocol was performed on a phantom using 3.0T 16 and 32 head channels coils. Multiples sequences were acquired on phantom to evaluate power consumption.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Stand-by mode accounted for 60 % of machine time and 40 % of energy consumption, active mode accounted for 20 % machine time and 40 % energy consumption, idle mode for 20 % imachine time and 20 % consumption. DWI and TOF sequences were the most consuming in our brain-MRI protocol. The low energy consuming protocol allowed a saving of approximately 10 % of energy consumption, which amounted for 0.20€ for each examination. This difference was mainly due to an energy consumption reduction of the DWI sequence. There were no difference in consumption between a 3.0T 16 and 32 channels head coils. Sequence's active power and duration (especially considering slice thickness) have to be taken into account when trying to optimize energy consumption.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are two key factors to consider when trying to reduce MRI scan energy consumption. Stand-by mode energy consumption has to be taken into account when choosing an MRI scan, as it can't be changed further on. Active mode energy consumption is dependent of the MRI protocols used, and can be reduced with sequences adaptation, which must take into account sequence's active power and duration, on top of image quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy consumption in MRI: Determinants and management options\",\"authors\":\"Mateusz Chodorowski ,&nbsp;Julien Ognard ,&nbsp;Àlex Rovira ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Gentric ,&nbsp;David Bourhis ,&nbsp;Douraied Ben Salem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurad.2023.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Energy consumption awareness is a known concern, and radiology departments have energy-intensive consuming machines. The means of energy consumption management in MRI scanners have yet to be evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To measure the MRI energy consumption and to evaluate the means to reduce it.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Data was retrieved for two MRI scanners through the hospital's automated energy consumption measurement software. After correlation with picture archiving and communication system (PACS) files, they were segmented by machine and mode (as follows: stand-by, idle and active) and analyzed. Active mode data for a specific brain MRI protocol have been isolated, and equivalent low energy consuming protocol was made. Both were performed on phantom and compared. Same protocol was performed on a phantom using 3.0T 16 and 32 head channels coils. Multiples sequences were acquired on phantom to evaluate power consumption.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Stand-by mode accounted for 60 % of machine time and 40 % of energy consumption, active mode accounted for 20 % machine time and 40 % energy consumption, idle mode for 20 % imachine time and 20 % consumption. DWI and TOF sequences were the most consuming in our brain-MRI protocol. The low energy consuming protocol allowed a saving of approximately 10 % of energy consumption, which amounted for 0.20€ for each examination. This difference was mainly due to an energy consumption reduction of the DWI sequence. There were no difference in consumption between a 3.0T 16 and 32 channels head coils. Sequence's active power and duration (especially considering slice thickness) have to be taken into account when trying to optimize energy consumption.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are two key factors to consider when trying to reduce MRI scan energy consumption. Stand-by mode energy consumption has to be taken into account when choosing an MRI scan, as it can't be changed further on. Active mode energy consumption is dependent of the MRI protocols used, and can be reduced with sequences adaptation, which must take into account sequence's active power and duration, on top of image quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986123002705\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986123002705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源消耗意识是一个众所周知的问题,放射科有能源密集型消耗机器。MRI扫描仪的能量消耗管理方法还有待评估。目的测量MRI能耗,探讨降低能耗的方法。材料和方法通过医院的自动能耗测量软件检索两台MRI扫描仪的数据。在与图片存档和通信系统(PACS)文件进行关联后,按机器和模式(待机、空闲和活动)进行分割并分析。对特定脑MRI方案的活动模式数据进行了分离,并制定了等效的低能耗方案。两种方法均在幻肢上进行比较。在使用3.0 t16和32头通道线圈的幻影上执行相同的方案。在幻影上获取多个序列以评估功耗。结果待机模式占机器时间的60%,能耗的40%;主动模式占机器时间的20%,能耗的40%;空闲模式占机器时间的20%,能耗的20%。DWI和TOF序列在我们的脑mri协议中是最消耗的。低能耗方案允许节省大约10%的能源消耗,相当于每次检查0.20欧元。这种差异主要是由于DWI序列的能耗降低。3.0T 16和32通道头线圈之间的消耗没有差异。在尝试优化能耗时,必须考虑到序列的有功功率和持续时间(特别是考虑到切片厚度)。结论降低MRI扫描能耗需要考虑两个关键因素。在选择核磁共振扫描时,待机模式的能量消耗必须考虑在内,因为它不能再改变。主动模式能量消耗取决于所使用的MRI协议,并且可以通过序列自适应来降低,序列自适应必须考虑序列的有功功率和持续时间,以及图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy consumption in MRI: Determinants and management options

Background

Energy consumption awareness is a known concern, and radiology departments have energy-intensive consuming machines. The means of energy consumption management in MRI scanners have yet to be evaluated.

Purpose

To measure the MRI energy consumption and to evaluate the means to reduce it.

Materials and methods

Data was retrieved for two MRI scanners through the hospital's automated energy consumption measurement software. After correlation with picture archiving and communication system (PACS) files, they were segmented by machine and mode (as follows: stand-by, idle and active) and analyzed. Active mode data for a specific brain MRI protocol have been isolated, and equivalent low energy consuming protocol was made. Both were performed on phantom and compared. Same protocol was performed on a phantom using 3.0T 16 and 32 head channels coils. Multiples sequences were acquired on phantom to evaluate power consumption.

Results

Stand-by mode accounted for 60 % of machine time and 40 % of energy consumption, active mode accounted for 20 % machine time and 40 % energy consumption, idle mode for 20 % imachine time and 20 % consumption. DWI and TOF sequences were the most consuming in our brain-MRI protocol. The low energy consuming protocol allowed a saving of approximately 10 % of energy consumption, which amounted for 0.20€ for each examination. This difference was mainly due to an energy consumption reduction of the DWI sequence. There were no difference in consumption between a 3.0T 16 and 32 channels head coils. Sequence's active power and duration (especially considering slice thickness) have to be taken into account when trying to optimize energy consumption.

Conclusion

There are two key factors to consider when trying to reduce MRI scan energy consumption. Stand-by mode energy consumption has to be taken into account when choosing an MRI scan, as it can't be changed further on. Active mode energy consumption is dependent of the MRI protocols used, and can be reduced with sequences adaptation, which must take into account sequence's active power and duration, on top of image quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信