有前途的教育技术遇到复杂的系统:自适应学习项目从最初的探索到试点结束的6年案例研究

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrea Gregg, Junxiu Yu, Jessica Resig, Lynne Johnson, Eunsung Park, Phil Stuczynski
{"title":"有前途的教育技术遇到复杂的系统:自适应学习项目从最初的探索到试点结束的6年案例研究","authors":"Andrea Gregg, Junxiu Yu, Jessica Resig, Lynne Johnson, Eunsung Park, Phil Stuczynski","doi":"10.1007/s41686-021-00057-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Instructional designers (IDs) are charged with what some might argue is the impossible: implementing innovative technologies and new pedagogical approaches within complex systems that often implicitly discourage change. This 6-year case study examined key factors influencing the exploration, multi-course pilot, and ultimate end of an adaptive learning (AL) project. AL has been recognized as a potentially transformative approach for online learning that individualizes instruction to each student based on demonstrated competencies. Past research has considered performance comparisons, learner characteristics, course design, and teaching practices, but what has been largely overlooked is an examination of the ways in which the university context itself impacts, and is impacted by, AL. Our study showed that while IDs and instructors easily recognize the potential benefits of AL, it is significantly more difficult to gain sustained administrative leadership advocacy. Primary challenges encountered were (1) AL’s disruption to the online teaching and learning status quo and (2) ongoing tensions between institutional structure, culture, and best practices for AL. The findings of this study suggest that a systems-based approach to organizational change is necessary for the successful implementation of multifaceted approaches like AL. The paper offers IDs greater insight into what can happen “behind the scenes” to support or challenge the success of educational technology implementations. While they may not always be able to impact these factors directly, having more awareness about the system complexity can allow them to be more strategic in asking for resources and buy-in from leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":73753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of formative design in learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promising Educational Technology Meets Complex System: a 6-year Case Study of an Adaptive Learning Project from Initial Exploration Through the End of a Pilot\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Gregg, Junxiu Yu, Jessica Resig, Lynne Johnson, Eunsung Park, Phil Stuczynski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41686-021-00057-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Instructional designers (IDs) are charged with what some might argue is the impossible: implementing innovative technologies and new pedagogical approaches within complex systems that often implicitly discourage change. This 6-year case study examined key factors influencing the exploration, multi-course pilot, and ultimate end of an adaptive learning (AL) project. AL has been recognized as a potentially transformative approach for online learning that individualizes instruction to each student based on demonstrated competencies. Past research has considered performance comparisons, learner characteristics, course design, and teaching practices, but what has been largely overlooked is an examination of the ways in which the university context itself impacts, and is impacted by, AL. Our study showed that while IDs and instructors easily recognize the potential benefits of AL, it is significantly more difficult to gain sustained administrative leadership advocacy. Primary challenges encountered were (1) AL’s disruption to the online teaching and learning status quo and (2) ongoing tensions between institutional structure, culture, and best practices for AL. The findings of this study suggest that a systems-based approach to organizational change is necessary for the successful implementation of multifaceted approaches like AL. The paper offers IDs greater insight into what can happen “behind the scenes” to support or challenge the success of educational technology implementations. While they may not always be able to impact these factors directly, having more awareness about the system complexity can allow them to be more strategic in asking for resources and buy-in from leadership.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-021-00057-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of formative design in learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-021-00057-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教学设计师(IDs)承担着一些可能被认为是不可能的任务:在通常暗含阻碍变革的复杂系统中实施创新技术和新的教学方法。这项为期6年的案例研究考察了影响适应性学习(AL)项目探索、多课程试点和最终结束的关键因素。人工智能已经被认为是一种潜在的在线学习变革方法,它可以根据每个学生的表现能力对其进行个性化教学。过去的研究考虑了绩效比较、学习者特征、课程设计和教学实践,但在很大程度上被忽视的是对大学环境本身影响人工智能的方式的检查,以及受人工智能影响的方式。我们的研究表明,虽然IDs和教师很容易认识到人工智能的潜在好处,但要获得持续的行政领导倡导却要困难得多。遇到的主要挑战是:(1)人工智能对在线教学现状的破坏;(2)制度结构、文化、本研究的结果表明,组织变革的基于系统的方法对于成功实施像人工智能这样的多方面方法是必要的。本文为IDs提供了更深入的见解,了解“幕后”可能发生的事情,以支持或挑战教育技术实施的成功。虽然他们可能并不总是能够直接影响这些因素,但对系统复杂性有更多的认识可以使他们在请求资源和从领导那里获得支持时更具战略性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promising Educational Technology Meets Complex System: a 6-year Case Study of an Adaptive Learning Project from Initial Exploration Through the End of a Pilot

Instructional designers (IDs) are charged with what some might argue is the impossible: implementing innovative technologies and new pedagogical approaches within complex systems that often implicitly discourage change. This 6-year case study examined key factors influencing the exploration, multi-course pilot, and ultimate end of an adaptive learning (AL) project. AL has been recognized as a potentially transformative approach for online learning that individualizes instruction to each student based on demonstrated competencies. Past research has considered performance comparisons, learner characteristics, course design, and teaching practices, but what has been largely overlooked is an examination of the ways in which the university context itself impacts, and is impacted by, AL. Our study showed that while IDs and instructors easily recognize the potential benefits of AL, it is significantly more difficult to gain sustained administrative leadership advocacy. Primary challenges encountered were (1) AL’s disruption to the online teaching and learning status quo and (2) ongoing tensions between institutional structure, culture, and best practices for AL. The findings of this study suggest that a systems-based approach to organizational change is necessary for the successful implementation of multifaceted approaches like AL. The paper offers IDs greater insight into what can happen “behind the scenes” to support or challenge the success of educational technology implementations. While they may not always be able to impact these factors directly, having more awareness about the system complexity can allow them to be more strategic in asking for resources and buy-in from leadership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信