评价电子学习材料教学可用性的年龄和性别差异

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Liubomir Djalev, Stanislav Bogdanov
{"title":"评价电子学习材料教学可用性的年龄和性别差异","authors":"Liubomir Djalev, Stanislav Bogdanov","doi":"10.33919/esnbu.19.2.0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to examine the pedagogical usability of interactive e-learning materials for foreign language practice. It is based upon two studies of the expected between-group and within-group differences among participants in the educational process. The sample consists of two groups – lecturers and students, a total of 100 participants, each evaluating four materials specifically prepared for this study. Two consecutive repeated measures ANOVA were conducted in which the gender/age, the position of the participants in the educational process, and usability dimensions were the independent variables. Results indicated that all independent variables and their interactions have a significant effects on the evaluations of the pedagogical usability. Women tend to assign higher values than men. Аge groups generally differ in their evaluations, although there is a tendency to give similar ratings for the individual dimensions of pedagogical usability. The 31-40 years age group evaluates the materials higher while the lowest evaluations are given by the groups of 21-30 and 50+ year old participants. Students tend to rate the pedagogical usability systemically higher than the lecturers. Usability dimensions also have a significant effect on evaluations. The most prominent feature of the materials, by a great margin, is their Applicability. The findings corroborate previous research which show age and gender differences in web usability do exist. We conclude that these differences exist as much in pedagogical usability as in technical usability. Further investigations are suggested to explore more deeply the differences in the perceived pedagogical value of e-learning materials as this has implications for instructional designers, teachers and learners alike.","PeriodicalId":40179,"journal":{"name":"English Studies at NBU","volume":"228 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age and Gender Differences in Evaluating the Pedagogical Usability of E-Learning Materials\",\"authors\":\"Liubomir Djalev, Stanislav Bogdanov\",\"doi\":\"10.33919/esnbu.19.2.0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the study is to examine the pedagogical usability of interactive e-learning materials for foreign language practice. It is based upon two studies of the expected between-group and within-group differences among participants in the educational process. The sample consists of two groups – lecturers and students, a total of 100 participants, each evaluating four materials specifically prepared for this study. Two consecutive repeated measures ANOVA were conducted in which the gender/age, the position of the participants in the educational process, and usability dimensions were the independent variables. Results indicated that all independent variables and their interactions have a significant effects on the evaluations of the pedagogical usability. Women tend to assign higher values than men. Аge groups generally differ in their evaluations, although there is a tendency to give similar ratings for the individual dimensions of pedagogical usability. The 31-40 years age group evaluates the materials higher while the lowest evaluations are given by the groups of 21-30 and 50+ year old participants. Students tend to rate the pedagogical usability systemically higher than the lecturers. Usability dimensions also have a significant effect on evaluations. The most prominent feature of the materials, by a great margin, is their Applicability. The findings corroborate previous research which show age and gender differences in web usability do exist. We conclude that these differences exist as much in pedagogical usability as in technical usability. Further investigations are suggested to explore more deeply the differences in the perceived pedagogical value of e-learning materials as this has implications for instructional designers, teachers and learners alike.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Studies at NBU\",\"volume\":\"228 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Studies at NBU\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.19.2.0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Studies at NBU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.19.2.0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨互动式电子学习材料在外语教学中的可用性。它基于两项研究,研究参与者在教育过程中预期的组间和组内差异。样本由讲师和学生两组组成,共100名参与者,每组评估为本研究专门准备的四种材料。以性别/年龄、参与者在教育过程中的位置、可用性维度为自变量,进行两次连续重复测量方差分析。结果表明,各自变量及其相互作用对教学可用性评价有显著影响。女性倾向于赋予比男性更高的价值。Аge小组通常在他们的评估中有所不同,尽管有一种趋势是对教学可用性的各个方面给出类似的评级。31-40岁年龄组对材料的评价较高,21-30岁和50岁以上年龄组的评价最低。学生对教学可用性的总体评价高于教师。可用性维度对评估也有重要影响。这些材料最显著的特点,很大程度上是它们的适用性。这些发现证实了之前的研究,即在网络可用性方面存在年龄和性别差异。我们得出结论,这些差异在教学可用性和技术可用性中同样存在。建议进一步调查,以更深入地探索电子学习材料在感知教学价值方面的差异,因为这对教学设计师、教师和学习者都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age and Gender Differences in Evaluating the Pedagogical Usability of E-Learning Materials
The purpose of the study is to examine the pedagogical usability of interactive e-learning materials for foreign language practice. It is based upon two studies of the expected between-group and within-group differences among participants in the educational process. The sample consists of two groups – lecturers and students, a total of 100 participants, each evaluating four materials specifically prepared for this study. Two consecutive repeated measures ANOVA were conducted in which the gender/age, the position of the participants in the educational process, and usability dimensions were the independent variables. Results indicated that all independent variables and their interactions have a significant effects on the evaluations of the pedagogical usability. Women tend to assign higher values than men. Аge groups generally differ in their evaluations, although there is a tendency to give similar ratings for the individual dimensions of pedagogical usability. The 31-40 years age group evaluates the materials higher while the lowest evaluations are given by the groups of 21-30 and 50+ year old participants. Students tend to rate the pedagogical usability systemically higher than the lecturers. Usability dimensions also have a significant effect on evaluations. The most prominent feature of the materials, by a great margin, is their Applicability. The findings corroborate previous research which show age and gender differences in web usability do exist. We conclude that these differences exist as much in pedagogical usability as in technical usability. Further investigations are suggested to explore more deeply the differences in the perceived pedagogical value of e-learning materials as this has implications for instructional designers, teachers and learners alike.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
English Studies at NBU
English Studies at NBU LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信