基于一种新的可控随机元胞自动机模型的基于间隙和基于流量的交通流控制策略的比较

Kayo Kinjo, Akiyasu Tomoeda
{"title":"基于一种新的可控随机元胞自动机模型的基于间隙和基于流量的交通流控制策略的比较","authors":"Kayo Kinjo, Akiyasu Tomoeda","doi":"arxiv-2308.14291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous vehicles are widely considered an imperative element of future\ntransportation systems, and their adoption is expected to reduce traffic\ncongestion. What is an effective vehicle control to reduce it? This study\nexplores the impact of different vehicle control strategies on traffic flow\nthrough simulations. To achieve this, we introduce a novel stochastic traffic\nflow model called the controlled stochastic optimal velocity (CSOV) model,\nwhich incorporates vehicle control effects. Two distinct control strategies are\napplied within the CSOV model: gap-based control (GC) and flow-based control\n(FC). The GC strategy regulates the velocity to equalize the gap between the\nfront and rear vehicles. Conversely, the FC strategy regulates the velocity to\nmaintain a consistent front and rear flow rate. The results show that there\nwere density regions where the GC strategy improved the flow rate. However,\nonly the GC strategy with the weak control resulted in a lower flow rate\ncompared to when there was no control. Conversely, the FC strategy consistently\nimproved the flow rate regardless of control strength, yielding more robust\nresults. Furthermore, when the two controls achieve similar flow rates, the FC\nstrategy provided a more robust velocity distribution for density change than\nthe GC strategy.","PeriodicalId":501231,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of gap-based and flow-based control strategies using a new controlled stochastic cellular automaton model for traffic flow\",\"authors\":\"Kayo Kinjo, Akiyasu Tomoeda\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2308.14291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Autonomous vehicles are widely considered an imperative element of future\\ntransportation systems, and their adoption is expected to reduce traffic\\ncongestion. What is an effective vehicle control to reduce it? This study\\nexplores the impact of different vehicle control strategies on traffic flow\\nthrough simulations. To achieve this, we introduce a novel stochastic traffic\\nflow model called the controlled stochastic optimal velocity (CSOV) model,\\nwhich incorporates vehicle control effects. Two distinct control strategies are\\napplied within the CSOV model: gap-based control (GC) and flow-based control\\n(FC). The GC strategy regulates the velocity to equalize the gap between the\\nfront and rear vehicles. Conversely, the FC strategy regulates the velocity to\\nmaintain a consistent front and rear flow rate. The results show that there\\nwere density regions where the GC strategy improved the flow rate. However,\\nonly the GC strategy with the weak control resulted in a lower flow rate\\ncompared to when there was no control. Conversely, the FC strategy consistently\\nimproved the flow rate regardless of control strength, yielding more robust\\nresults. Furthermore, when the two controls achieve similar flow rates, the FC\\nstrategy provided a more robust velocity distribution for density change than\\nthe GC strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2308.14291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2308.14291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动驾驶汽车被广泛认为是未来交通系统的必要组成部分,它们的采用有望减少交通拥堵。如何有效地控制车辆以减少污染?本研究探讨不同车辆控制策略对交通流仿真的影响。为了实现这一目标,我们引入了一种新的随机交通流模型,称为可控随机最优速度(CSOV)模型,该模型考虑了车辆控制效应。在CSOV模型中应用了两种不同的控制策略:基于间隙的控制(GC)和基于流量的控制(FC)。GC策略通过调节速度来平衡前后车辆之间的差距。相反,FC策略调节速度以保持前后流量一致。结果表明,在密度区域,GC策略提高了流量。然而,只有弱控制的GC策略比没有控制的GC策略的流率更低。相反,无论控制强度如何,FC策略都能持续提高流量,从而产生更稳健的结果。此外,当两种控制达到相似的流量时,fc策略提供了比GC策略更稳健的密度变化速度分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of gap-based and flow-based control strategies using a new controlled stochastic cellular automaton model for traffic flow
Autonomous vehicles are widely considered an imperative element of future transportation systems, and their adoption is expected to reduce traffic congestion. What is an effective vehicle control to reduce it? This study explores the impact of different vehicle control strategies on traffic flow through simulations. To achieve this, we introduce a novel stochastic traffic flow model called the controlled stochastic optimal velocity (CSOV) model, which incorporates vehicle control effects. Two distinct control strategies are applied within the CSOV model: gap-based control (GC) and flow-based control (FC). The GC strategy regulates the velocity to equalize the gap between the front and rear vehicles. Conversely, the FC strategy regulates the velocity to maintain a consistent front and rear flow rate. The results show that there were density regions where the GC strategy improved the flow rate. However, only the GC strategy with the weak control resulted in a lower flow rate compared to when there was no control. Conversely, the FC strategy consistently improved the flow rate regardless of control strength, yielding more robust results. Furthermore, when the two controls achieve similar flow rates, the FC strategy provided a more robust velocity distribution for density change than the GC strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信