亚里士多德停滞论中的认识与再分配

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
POLIS Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1163/20512996-12340354
Douglas Cairns, Mirko Canevaro, Kleanthis Mantzouranis
{"title":"亚里士多德停滞论中的认识与再分配","authors":"Douglas Cairns, Mirko Canevaro, Kleanthis Mantzouranis","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In <em>Politics</em> 5.1–3, Aristotle sees different conceptions of proportional equality and justice as the fundamental causes of <em>stasis</em> and <em>metabolē</em> (constitutional change). His account shows what happens to notions of ‘particular’ justice when they become causes of individual and collective action in pursuit of moral and political revolution. The whole discussion of the causes of <em>stasis</em> should be read through the filter of individual/group motivation – as a reflection of what goes on in the heads of those who engage in <em>stasis</em>. Movements towards political change are motivated by ingrained conceptions of proportional equality and fair distribution of honour and wealth. Aristotle’s approach, therefore, may be compared to Axel Honneth’s, that social justice should be seen in terms of the distribution of dignity and respect as well as of material resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognition and Redistribution in Aristotle’s Account of Stasis\",\"authors\":\"Douglas Cairns, Mirko Canevaro, Kleanthis Mantzouranis\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/20512996-12340354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In <em>Politics</em> 5.1–3, Aristotle sees different conceptions of proportional equality and justice as the fundamental causes of <em>stasis</em> and <em>metabolē</em> (constitutional change). His account shows what happens to notions of ‘particular’ justice when they become causes of individual and collective action in pursuit of moral and political revolution. The whole discussion of the causes of <em>stasis</em> should be read through the filter of individual/group motivation – as a reflection of what goes on in the heads of those who engage in <em>stasis</em>. Movements towards political change are motivated by ingrained conceptions of proportional equality and fair distribution of honour and wealth. Aristotle’s approach, therefore, may be compared to Axel Honneth’s, that social justice should be seen in terms of the distribution of dignity and respect as well as of material resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POLIS\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POLIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340354\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在《政治学》5.1-3中,亚里士多德认为比例平等和正义的不同概念是停滞和代谢(宪法变化)的根本原因。他的描述表明,当“特殊”正义的概念成为追求道德和政治革命的个人和集体行动的原因时,它们会发生什么变化。关于停滞原因的整个讨论应该通过个人/群体动机的过滤来解读——作为那些参与停滞的人头脑中发生的事情的反映。政治变革运动的动机是根深蒂固的比例平等和公平分配荣誉和财富的观念。因此,亚里士多德的方法可以与阿克塞尔·霍尼特的方法相比较,即社会正义应该被视为尊严和尊重的分配,以及物质资源的分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recognition and Redistribution in Aristotle’s Account of Stasis

In Politics 5.1–3, Aristotle sees different conceptions of proportional equality and justice as the fundamental causes of stasis and metabolē (constitutional change). His account shows what happens to notions of ‘particular’ justice when they become causes of individual and collective action in pursuit of moral and political revolution. The whole discussion of the causes of stasis should be read through the filter of individual/group motivation – as a reflection of what goes on in the heads of those who engage in stasis. Movements towards political change are motivated by ingrained conceptions of proportional equality and fair distribution of honour and wealth. Aristotle’s approach, therefore, may be compared to Axel Honneth’s, that social justice should be seen in terms of the distribution of dignity and respect as well as of material resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
POLIS
POLIS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信