国土安全评估和演习计划的平衡计分卡方法
IF 1.9
Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
引用次数: 0
摘要
国土安全演习与评估计划(HSEEP)是演习设计与开发、管理、评估和改进计划的标准计划，但它在运行中面临着一些挑战。本研究的重点是HSEEP的评估能力，并为使用平衡计分卡(BSC)方法的项目改进提供实用的建议。尽管HSEEP在性能测量方面面临着无数挑战，但研究表明，通过结合平衡计分卡方法可以解决其中的一些限制。本研究解释并展示了四种平衡计分卡方法，即内部和外部利益相关者、组织过程、财务和学习方面，如何改善HSEEP。本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
A Balanced Scorecard approach to the Homeland Security Evaluation and Exercise Program
The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) is the standard program for exercise design and development, management, evaluation, and improvement planning, but it has several challenges for its operation. This study focuses on HSEEP evaluative capacity and provides practical recommendations for program improvement using the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach. Although HSEEP has a myriad of challenges related to its performance measurement, the study asserts that some of these limitations can be addressed by incorporating the BSC approach. The study explains and demonstrates how the four BSC approaches, internal and external stakeholders, organizational process, financial, and learning aspects, can improve the HSEEP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
来源期刊
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍：
Scholarship on risk, hazards, and crises (emergencies, disasters, or public policy/organizational crises) has developed into mature and distinct fields of inquiry. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy (RHCPP) addresses the governance implications of the important questions raised for the respective fields. The relationships between risk, hazards, and crisis raise fundamental questions with broad social science and policy implications. During unstable situations of acute or chronic danger and substantial uncertainty (i.e. a crisis), important and deeply rooted societal institutions, norms, and values come into play. The purpose of RHCPP is to provide a forum for research and commentary that examines societies’ understanding of and measures to address risk,hazards, and crises, how public policies do and should address these concerns, and to what effect. The journal is explicitly designed to encourage a broad range of perspectives by integrating work from a variety of disciplines. The journal will look at social science theory and policy design across the spectrum of risks and crises — including natural and technological hazards, public health crises, terrorism, and societal and environmental disasters. Papers will analyze the ways societies deal with both unpredictable and predictable events as public policy questions, which include topics such as crisis governance, loss and liability, emergency response, agenda setting, and the social and cultural contexts in which hazards, risks and crises are perceived and defined. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy invites dialogue and is open to new approaches. We seek scholarly work that combines academic quality with practical relevance. We especially welcome authors writing on the governance of risk and crises to submit their manuscripts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
