Hampus Larsson, Edit Strömbäck, Mikael Schau, Susanna Johansson, Lars Berglund
{"title":"有或没有腰痛的力量举重运动员的腰骨盆运动控制","authors":"Hampus Larsson, Edit Strömbäck, Mikael Schau, Susanna Johansson, Lars Berglund","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To measure lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quantitative Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve powerlifters with LBP and 28 powerlifters without LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Powerlifters were recruited in nine different cities and filmed while performing a movement control test battery.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Lumbopelvic movement control test battery consisting of seven tests, with a possible score between 0 and 13. The tests were rated by a physical therapist blinded to the group allocation and comparisons of the frequency of current/incorrect tests between groups were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference in the movement control test battery between the powerlifters with LBP (Median = 7.0, (2–11)) and powerlifters without LBP (Median = 6.0, (1–10)) (P = 0.59). There were no statistically significant differences between groups when the individual movement control tests were analyzed separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lack of significant differences between groups indicates that performance in lumbopelvic movement control test might not be associated with LBP in powerlifters. More studies on associations between LBP and movement control and other body functions are needed to guide assessment and treatment of powerlifters with LBP and for investigation of possible risk factors for LBP in powerlifters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"65 ","pages":"Pages 74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001451/pdfft?md5=363b10dd98f7ee8998bfb02acfa95e5a&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X23001451-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain\",\"authors\":\"Hampus Larsson, Edit Strömbäck, Mikael Schau, Susanna Johansson, Lars Berglund\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To measure lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quantitative Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve powerlifters with LBP and 28 powerlifters without LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Powerlifters were recruited in nine different cities and filmed while performing a movement control test battery.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Lumbopelvic movement control test battery consisting of seven tests, with a possible score between 0 and 13. The tests were rated by a physical therapist blinded to the group allocation and comparisons of the frequency of current/incorrect tests between groups were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference in the movement control test battery between the powerlifters with LBP (Median = 7.0, (2–11)) and powerlifters without LBP (Median = 6.0, (1–10)) (P = 0.59). There were no statistically significant differences between groups when the individual movement control tests were analyzed separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lack of significant differences between groups indicates that performance in lumbopelvic movement control test might not be associated with LBP in powerlifters. More studies on associations between LBP and movement control and other body functions are needed to guide assessment and treatment of powerlifters with LBP and for investigation of possible risk factors for LBP in powerlifters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 74-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001451/pdfft?md5=363b10dd98f7ee8998bfb02acfa95e5a&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X23001451-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001451\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain
Objectives
To measure lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain (LBP).
Design
Quantitative Cross-sectional.
Participants
Twelve powerlifters with LBP and 28 powerlifters without LBP.
Setting
Powerlifters were recruited in nine different cities and filmed while performing a movement control test battery.
Main outcome measures
Lumbopelvic movement control test battery consisting of seven tests, with a possible score between 0 and 13. The tests were rated by a physical therapist blinded to the group allocation and comparisons of the frequency of current/incorrect tests between groups were calculated.
Results
There was no statistically significant difference in the movement control test battery between the powerlifters with LBP (Median = 7.0, (2–11)) and powerlifters without LBP (Median = 6.0, (1–10)) (P = 0.59). There were no statistically significant differences between groups when the individual movement control tests were analyzed separately.
Conclusions
The lack of significant differences between groups indicates that performance in lumbopelvic movement control test might not be associated with LBP in powerlifters. More studies on associations between LBP and movement control and other body functions are needed to guide assessment and treatment of powerlifters with LBP and for investigation of possible risk factors for LBP in powerlifters.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science.
The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.