有或没有腰痛的力量举重运动员的腰骨盆运动控制

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Hampus Larsson, Edit Strömbäck, Mikael Schau, Susanna Johansson, Lars Berglund
{"title":"有或没有腰痛的力量举重运动员的腰骨盆运动控制","authors":"Hampus Larsson,&nbsp;Edit Strömbäck,&nbsp;Mikael Schau,&nbsp;Susanna Johansson,&nbsp;Lars Berglund","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To measure lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quantitative Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve powerlifters with LBP and 28 powerlifters without LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Powerlifters were recruited in nine different cities and filmed while performing a movement control test battery.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Lumbopelvic movement control test battery consisting of seven tests, with a possible score between 0 and 13. The tests were rated by a physical therapist blinded to the group allocation and comparisons of the frequency of current/incorrect tests between groups were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference in the movement control test battery between the powerlifters with LBP (Median = 7.0, (2–11)) and powerlifters without LBP (Median = 6.0, (1–10)) (P = 0.59). There were no statistically significant differences between groups when the individual movement control tests were analyzed separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lack of significant differences between groups indicates that performance in lumbopelvic movement control test might not be associated with LBP in powerlifters. More studies on associations between LBP and movement control and other body functions are needed to guide assessment and treatment of powerlifters with LBP and for investigation of possible risk factors for LBP in powerlifters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"65 ","pages":"Pages 74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001451/pdfft?md5=363b10dd98f7ee8998bfb02acfa95e5a&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X23001451-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain\",\"authors\":\"Hampus Larsson,&nbsp;Edit Strömbäck,&nbsp;Mikael Schau,&nbsp;Susanna Johansson,&nbsp;Lars Berglund\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To measure lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quantitative Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve powerlifters with LBP and 28 powerlifters without LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Powerlifters were recruited in nine different cities and filmed while performing a movement control test battery.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Lumbopelvic movement control test battery consisting of seven tests, with a possible score between 0 and 13. The tests were rated by a physical therapist blinded to the group allocation and comparisons of the frequency of current/incorrect tests between groups were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference in the movement control test battery between the powerlifters with LBP (Median = 7.0, (2–11)) and powerlifters without LBP (Median = 6.0, (1–10)) (P = 0.59). There were no statistically significant differences between groups when the individual movement control tests were analyzed separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lack of significant differences between groups indicates that performance in lumbopelvic movement control test might not be associated with LBP in powerlifters. More studies on associations between LBP and movement control and other body functions are needed to guide assessment and treatment of powerlifters with LBP and for investigation of possible risk factors for LBP in powerlifters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 74-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001451/pdfft?md5=363b10dd98f7ee8998bfb02acfa95e5a&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X23001451-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001451\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的观察有无腰痛的力量举重运动员腰骨盆运动控制情况。DesignQuantitative横断面。参与者:12名有腰痛的举重运动员和28名没有腰痛的举重运动员。在九个不同的城市招募了举重运动员,并拍摄了他们进行运动控制测试的过程。主要结果测量:腰盆腔运动控制测试由7项测试组成,得分可能在0到13之间。测试由不知道组分配的物理治疗师评分,并计算各组之间当前/错误测试的频率比较。结果有腰痛的举重运动员(Median = 7.0,(2-11))与无腰痛的举重运动员(Median = 6.0,(1-10))的运动控制测试续航时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.59)。当单独分析个体运动控制测试时,组间差异无统计学意义。结论组间无显著性差异,提示力量举重运动员腰盂运动控制测试成绩与腰痛无关。需要更多关于腰痛与运动控制和其他身体功能之间关系的研究,以指导力量举重运动员腰痛的评估和治疗,并调查力量举重运动员腰痛的可能危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain

Objectives

To measure lumbopelvic movement control in powerlifters with and without low back pain (LBP).

Design

Quantitative Cross-sectional.

Participants

Twelve powerlifters with LBP and 28 powerlifters without LBP.

Setting

Powerlifters were recruited in nine different cities and filmed while performing a movement control test battery.

Main outcome measures

Lumbopelvic movement control test battery consisting of seven tests, with a possible score between 0 and 13. The tests were rated by a physical therapist blinded to the group allocation and comparisons of the frequency of current/incorrect tests between groups were calculated.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the movement control test battery between the powerlifters with LBP (Median = 7.0, (2–11)) and powerlifters without LBP (Median = 6.0, (1–10)) (P = 0.59). There were no statistically significant differences between groups when the individual movement control tests were analyzed separately.

Conclusions

The lack of significant differences between groups indicates that performance in lumbopelvic movement control test might not be associated with LBP in powerlifters. More studies on associations between LBP and movement control and other body functions are needed to guide assessment and treatment of powerlifters with LBP and for investigation of possible risk factors for LBP in powerlifters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信