正式中的非正式:高等教育中非正式学习的模式与衡量

IF 3.8 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Julian Decius, Janika Dannowsky, Niclas Schaper
{"title":"正式中的非正式:高等教育中非正式学习的模式与衡量","authors":"Julian Decius, Janika Dannowsky, Niclas Schaper","doi":"10.1177/14697874221087427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research and practice have recognized the importance of informal learning—a specific type of active learning—for higher education contexts. University students learn not only in formally organized courses, but also in a self-directed and intentional way from fellow students, through trial and error, and by reflection. However, there has been a lack of valid measures to operationalize students’ informal learning. In this study, we thus develop the Informal Student Learning (ISL) scale for higher education, building on the Octagon Model of Informal Workplace Learning and the model’s associated measure from the vocational learning context. Our scale contains eight components with three items each. Using three samples of university students (<i>N</i> = 545, <i>N</i> = 818, <i>N</i> = 310), we examined the model structure of ISL and the scale’s validity in an international context. The results show that the conceptual structure of informal <i>workplace</i> learning and informal <i>student</i> learning is similar for <i>intent to learn</i> and <i>reflection</i>, but different for <i>experience/action</i> and <i>feedback</i>. Examining validity, we found evidence for concurrent validity in terms of study-related self-efficacy and academic performance, and for convergent and discriminant validity indicators of the eight ISL components. The scale has configural and metric measurement invariance for age, gender, and academic achievement, and additionally scalar invariance for age. Potential applications of the new measure in the context of active learning for research, for lecturers, and for students are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47411,"journal":{"name":"Active Learning in Higher Education","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The casual within the formal: A model and measure of informal learning in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Julian Decius, Janika Dannowsky, Niclas Schaper\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14697874221087427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Research and practice have recognized the importance of informal learning—a specific type of active learning—for higher education contexts. University students learn not only in formally organized courses, but also in a self-directed and intentional way from fellow students, through trial and error, and by reflection. However, there has been a lack of valid measures to operationalize students’ informal learning. In this study, we thus develop the Informal Student Learning (ISL) scale for higher education, building on the Octagon Model of Informal Workplace Learning and the model’s associated measure from the vocational learning context. Our scale contains eight components with three items each. Using three samples of university students (<i>N</i> = 545, <i>N</i> = 818, <i>N</i> = 310), we examined the model structure of ISL and the scale’s validity in an international context. The results show that the conceptual structure of informal <i>workplace</i> learning and informal <i>student</i> learning is similar for <i>intent to learn</i> and <i>reflection</i>, but different for <i>experience/action</i> and <i>feedback</i>. Examining validity, we found evidence for concurrent validity in terms of study-related self-efficacy and academic performance, and for convergent and discriminant validity indicators of the eight ISL components. The scale has configural and metric measurement invariance for age, gender, and academic achievement, and additionally scalar invariance for age. Potential applications of the new measure in the context of active learning for research, for lecturers, and for students are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Active Learning in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Active Learning in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221087427\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Active Learning in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221087427","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究和实践已经认识到非正式学习——一种特殊类型的主动学习——对高等教育环境的重要性。大学生不仅在正式组织的课程中学习,而且还通过尝试和错误以及反思,以自主和有意的方式从同学那里学习。然而,缺乏有效的措施来实施学生的非正式学习。在本研究中,我们在非正式工作场所学习八边形模型的基础上,从职业学习的角度开发了高等教育非正式学生学习(ISL)量表。我们的量表有八个部分,每个部分有三个项目。以3个大学生为样本(N = 545, N = 818, N = 310),在国际背景下检验了ISL的模型结构和量表的效度。结果表明,非正式职场学习和非正式学生学习的概念结构在学习意图和反思方面是相似的,但在经验/行动和反馈方面是不同的。在效度检验中,我们发现了与学习相关的自我效能感和学业成绩,以及八个ISL成分的收敛效度和判别效度指标存在并发效度的证据。该量表对年龄、性别和学术成就具有结构和度量不变性,对年龄具有标量不变性。讨论了新测量在研究、讲师和学生主动学习方面的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The casual within the formal: A model and measure of informal learning in higher education

Research and practice have recognized the importance of informal learning—a specific type of active learning—for higher education contexts. University students learn not only in formally organized courses, but also in a self-directed and intentional way from fellow students, through trial and error, and by reflection. However, there has been a lack of valid measures to operationalize students’ informal learning. In this study, we thus develop the Informal Student Learning (ISL) scale for higher education, building on the Octagon Model of Informal Workplace Learning and the model’s associated measure from the vocational learning context. Our scale contains eight components with three items each. Using three samples of university students (N = 545, N = 818, N = 310), we examined the model structure of ISL and the scale’s validity in an international context. The results show that the conceptual structure of informal workplace learning and informal student learning is similar for intent to learn and reflection, but different for experience/action and feedback. Examining validity, we found evidence for concurrent validity in terms of study-related self-efficacy and academic performance, and for convergent and discriminant validity indicators of the eight ISL components. The scale has configural and metric measurement invariance for age, gender, and academic achievement, and additionally scalar invariance for age. Potential applications of the new measure in the context of active learning for research, for lecturers, and for students are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Active Learning in Higher Education
Active Learning in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Active Learning in Higher Education is an international, refereed publication for all those who teach and support learning in higher education (HE) and those who undertake or use research into effective learning, teaching and assessment in universities and colleges. The journal is devoted to publishing accounts of research covering all aspects of learning and teaching concerning adults in higher education. Non-discipline specific and non-context/country specific in nature, it comprises accounts of research across all areas of the curriculum; accounts which are relevant to faculty and others involved in learning and teaching in all disciplines, in all countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信