针对苹果应用商店的反垄断案

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Damien Geradin, Dimitrios Katsifis
{"title":"针对苹果应用商店的反垄断案","authors":"Damien Geradin, Dimitrios Katsifis","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhab003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Apple App Store is the only channel through which app developers may distribute their apps on iOS. First launched in 2008, the App Store has evolved into a highly profitable marketplace, with overall consumer spend exceeding $50 billion in 2019. However, concerns are being increasingly expressed on both sides of the Atlantic that various practices of Apple with regard to the App Store may breach competition law. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether this is indeed the case and, if so, how these concerns can be addressed. With these aims in mind, the paper first introduces the reader to the app ecosystem and the Apple App Store, with a focus on Apple’s in-app payment policies and the 30 percent commission charged for in-app purchases. After engaging critically with the distinction between apps selling “<em>digital</em>” and apps selling “<em>physical</em>” goods or services, we consider such distinction is unclear, artificial, and unprincipled.","PeriodicalId":45547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE ANTITRUST CASE AGAINST THE APPLE APP STORE\",\"authors\":\"Damien Geradin, Dimitrios Katsifis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joclec/nhab003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Apple App Store is the only channel through which app developers may distribute their apps on iOS. First launched in 2008, the App Store has evolved into a highly profitable marketplace, with overall consumer spend exceeding $50 billion in 2019. However, concerns are being increasingly expressed on both sides of the Atlantic that various practices of Apple with regard to the App Store may breach competition law. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether this is indeed the case and, if so, how these concerns can be addressed. With these aims in mind, the paper first introduces the reader to the app ecosystem and the Apple App Store, with a focus on Apple’s in-app payment policies and the 30 percent commission charged for in-app purchases. After engaging critically with the distinction between apps selling “<em>digital</em>” and apps selling “<em>physical</em>” goods or services, we consider such distinction is unclear, artificial, and unprincipled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Competition Law & Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Competition Law & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhab003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhab003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苹果应用商店是应用开发者在iOS平台上发布应用的唯一渠道。App Store于2008年首次推出,现已发展成为一个利润丰厚的市场,2019年消费者总支出超过500亿美元。然而,大西洋两岸越来越多的人担心,苹果在App Store上的各种做法可能违反了竞争法。本文的目的是检查是否确实如此,如果是这样,如何解决这些问题。带着这些目标,本文首先向读者介绍了应用生态系统和苹果应用商店,重点介绍了苹果的应用内付费政策和应用内购买收取的30%佣金。在批判性地探讨了销售“数字”应用和销售“实体”商品或服务的应用之间的区别之后,我们认为这种区别是不明确的、人为的、无原则的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE ANTITRUST CASE AGAINST THE APPLE APP STORE
The Apple App Store is the only channel through which app developers may distribute their apps on iOS. First launched in 2008, the App Store has evolved into a highly profitable marketplace, with overall consumer spend exceeding $50 billion in 2019. However, concerns are being increasingly expressed on both sides of the Atlantic that various practices of Apple with regard to the App Store may breach competition law. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether this is indeed the case and, if so, how these concerns can be addressed. With these aims in mind, the paper first introduces the reader to the app ecosystem and the Apple App Store, with a focus on Apple’s in-app payment policies and the 30 percent commission charged for in-app purchases. After engaging critically with the distinction between apps selling “digital” and apps selling “physical” goods or services, we consider such distinction is unclear, artificial, and unprincipled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
26.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信