基于智能的并网光伏系统最大功率跟踪优化算法综合比较研究

IF 3.8 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Marlin S, Sundarsingh Jebaseelan
{"title":"基于智能的并网光伏系统最大功率跟踪优化算法综合比较研究","authors":"Marlin S,&nbsp;Sundarsingh Jebaseelan","doi":"10.1016/j.suscom.2023.100946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>For maximum power point tracking (MPPT) in the solar Photovolatic (PV) system, the meta-heuristic optimization techniques have been widely applied in the last few decades. This is due to the fact that traditional MPPT methodologies are unable to monitor the global MPP in the face of shifting environmental factors. Hence, it is essential to use an intelligence based controlling algorithm for MPPT controlling. The main purpose of this study is to investigate and assess the effectiveness of three cutting-edge and distinctive </span>optimization algorithms<span> for MPPT controlling, including Mongoose Optimization (MO), Prairie Dog Optimization Algorithm (PDOA), and hybrid PDOA + MO. It also aims to select the most effective and sophisticated optimization algorithm to meet the grid systems' energy requirements. This research's original contribution is the implementation and performance evaluation of three alternative meta-heuristic models for MPPT controlling. The goal of this effort is to maximize the energy yield from photovoltaic systems<span> in order to meet the energy demands of grid systems<span>. Three different controlling strategies, including MO + MPPT, PDOA + MPPT, and MO + PDOA + MPPT, are used in this work to achieve this goal. To evaluate the effectiveness and improved performance outcomes, a number of parameters have been taken into account in this work, including time, error, power, THD, and others. Furthermore, using a comprehensive simulation and comparison study, the outcomes of the MO, PDOA, and hybrid PDOA + MO techniques have also been tested and confirmed in this work. Comparisons are also made between the peak, settling, and increasing times of the present and proposed regulatory models. The results and waveforms generated demonstrate that the hybrid PDOA + MO performs better than the other controlling models in terms of enhanced efficiency of 99.5 %, low rising time of 1.6 s, low peak time of 1.05 s, minimal settling time of 1.24 s, error rate of 0.48, response time of 0.005 s, and tracking time of 0.0019 s</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48686,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Computing-Informatics & Systems","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive comparative study on intelligence based optimization algorithms used for maximum power tracking in grid-PV systems\",\"authors\":\"Marlin S,&nbsp;Sundarsingh Jebaseelan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suscom.2023.100946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>For maximum power point tracking (MPPT) in the solar Photovolatic (PV) system, the meta-heuristic optimization techniques have been widely applied in the last few decades. This is due to the fact that traditional MPPT methodologies are unable to monitor the global MPP in the face of shifting environmental factors. Hence, it is essential to use an intelligence based controlling algorithm for MPPT controlling. The main purpose of this study is to investigate and assess the effectiveness of three cutting-edge and distinctive </span>optimization algorithms<span> for MPPT controlling, including Mongoose Optimization (MO), Prairie Dog Optimization Algorithm (PDOA), and hybrid PDOA + MO. It also aims to select the most effective and sophisticated optimization algorithm to meet the grid systems' energy requirements. This research's original contribution is the implementation and performance evaluation of three alternative meta-heuristic models for MPPT controlling. The goal of this effort is to maximize the energy yield from photovoltaic systems<span> in order to meet the energy demands of grid systems<span>. Three different controlling strategies, including MO + MPPT, PDOA + MPPT, and MO + PDOA + MPPT, are used in this work to achieve this goal. To evaluate the effectiveness and improved performance outcomes, a number of parameters have been taken into account in this work, including time, error, power, THD, and others. Furthermore, using a comprehensive simulation and comparison study, the outcomes of the MO, PDOA, and hybrid PDOA + MO techniques have also been tested and confirmed in this work. Comparisons are also made between the peak, settling, and increasing times of the present and proposed regulatory models. The results and waveforms generated demonstrate that the hybrid PDOA + MO performs better than the other controlling models in terms of enhanced efficiency of 99.5 %, low rising time of 1.6 s, low peak time of 1.05 s, minimal settling time of 1.24 s, error rate of 0.48, response time of 0.005 s, and tracking time of 0.0019 s</span></span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Computing-Informatics & Systems\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Computing-Informatics & Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210537923001014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Computing-Informatics & Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210537923001014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于太阳能光伏发电系统的最大功率点跟踪,元启发式优化技术在近几十年来得到了广泛的应用。这是由于面对不断变化的环境因素,传统的MPPT方法无法监测全球MPP。因此,采用基于智能的控制算法对MPPT进行控制是必要的。本研究的主要目的是研究和评估猫鼬优化算法(Mongoose optimization, MO)、草原土拨鼠优化算法(Prairie Dog optimization Algorithm, PDOA)和混合PDOA + MO三种具有前沿和特色的MPPT控制优化算法的有效性,并选择最有效和最复杂的优化算法来满足电网系统的能量需求。本研究的原创性贡献在于对MPPT控制的三种备选元启发式模型的实现和性能评估。这项工作的目标是最大限度地提高光伏系统的能源产量,以满足电网系统的能源需求。本文采用MO + MPPT、PDOA + MPPT、MO + PDOA + MPPT三种不同的控制策略来实现这一目标。为了评估有效性和改进的性能结果,在这项工作中考虑了许多参数,包括时间、误差、功率、THD等。此外,通过全面的仿真和对比研究,本文还对MO、PDOA和混合PDOA + MO技术的结果进行了测试和验证。比较了目前和提出的调节模型的峰值、稳定和增加时间。结果和生成的波形表明,混合PDOA + MO控制模型的效率提高了99.5%,低上升时间为1.6 s,低峰值时间为1.05 s,最小沉降时间为1.24 s,错误率为0.48,响应时间为0.005 s,跟踪时间为0.0019 s。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive comparative study on intelligence based optimization algorithms used for maximum power tracking in grid-PV systems

For maximum power point tracking (MPPT) in the solar Photovolatic (PV) system, the meta-heuristic optimization techniques have been widely applied in the last few decades. This is due to the fact that traditional MPPT methodologies are unable to monitor the global MPP in the face of shifting environmental factors. Hence, it is essential to use an intelligence based controlling algorithm for MPPT controlling. The main purpose of this study is to investigate and assess the effectiveness of three cutting-edge and distinctive optimization algorithms for MPPT controlling, including Mongoose Optimization (MO), Prairie Dog Optimization Algorithm (PDOA), and hybrid PDOA + MO. It also aims to select the most effective and sophisticated optimization algorithm to meet the grid systems' energy requirements. This research's original contribution is the implementation and performance evaluation of three alternative meta-heuristic models for MPPT controlling. The goal of this effort is to maximize the energy yield from photovoltaic systems in order to meet the energy demands of grid systems. Three different controlling strategies, including MO + MPPT, PDOA + MPPT, and MO + PDOA + MPPT, are used in this work to achieve this goal. To evaluate the effectiveness and improved performance outcomes, a number of parameters have been taken into account in this work, including time, error, power, THD, and others. Furthermore, using a comprehensive simulation and comparison study, the outcomes of the MO, PDOA, and hybrid PDOA + MO techniques have also been tested and confirmed in this work. Comparisons are also made between the peak, settling, and increasing times of the present and proposed regulatory models. The results and waveforms generated demonstrate that the hybrid PDOA + MO performs better than the other controlling models in terms of enhanced efficiency of 99.5 %, low rising time of 1.6 s, low peak time of 1.05 s, minimal settling time of 1.24 s, error rate of 0.48, response time of 0.005 s, and tracking time of 0.0019 s

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Computing-Informatics & Systems
Sustainable Computing-Informatics & Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTUREC-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.40%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Sustainable computing is a rapidly expanding research area spanning the fields of computer science and engineering, electrical engineering as well as other engineering disciplines. The aim of Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems (SUSCOM) is to publish the myriad research findings related to energy-aware and thermal-aware management of computing resource. Equally important is a spectrum of related research issues such as applications of computing that can have ecological and societal impacts. SUSCOM publishes original and timely research papers and survey articles in current areas of power, energy, temperature, and environment related research areas of current importance to readers. SUSCOM has an editorial board comprising prominent researchers from around the world and selects competitively evaluated peer-reviewed papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信