计算电催化中的气相误差综述

EES catalysis Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1039/D3EY00126A
Ricardo Urrego-Ortiz, Santiago Builes, Francesc Illas and Federico Calle-Vallejo
{"title":"计算电催化中的气相误差综述","authors":"Ricardo Urrego-Ortiz, Santiago Builes, Francesc Illas and Federico Calle-Vallejo","doi":"10.1039/D3EY00126A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Currently, computational models based on density functional theory (DFT) are intensively used for the analysis of electrocatalytic reactions and the design of enhanced catalysts. As the accuracy of these models is subjected to the quality of the input data, knowing the intrinsic limitations of DFT is crucial to improve computational predictions. A common pitfall of DFT is the estimation of the total energies of molecules, particularly those containing double and triple bonds. In this review, we show how gas-phase errors permeate thermodynamic and kinetic models of customary use in electrocatalysis, potentially compromising their predictiveness. First, we illustrate how these errors can be identified and provide a list of corrections for common molecules and functional groups. Subsequently, we explain how the errors spread from simple reaction energy calculations to adsorption energies, scaling relations, equilibrium potentials, overpotentials, and Sabatier-type activity plots. Finally, we list the remaining challenges toward an improved assessment of energetics at solid–gas–liquid interfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":72877,"journal":{"name":"EES catalysis","volume":" 1","pages":" 157-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ey/d3ey00126a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gas-phase errors in computational electrocatalysis: a review\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Urrego-Ortiz, Santiago Builes, Francesc Illas and Federico Calle-Vallejo\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D3EY00126A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Currently, computational models based on density functional theory (DFT) are intensively used for the analysis of electrocatalytic reactions and the design of enhanced catalysts. As the accuracy of these models is subjected to the quality of the input data, knowing the intrinsic limitations of DFT is crucial to improve computational predictions. A common pitfall of DFT is the estimation of the total energies of molecules, particularly those containing double and triple bonds. In this review, we show how gas-phase errors permeate thermodynamic and kinetic models of customary use in electrocatalysis, potentially compromising their predictiveness. First, we illustrate how these errors can be identified and provide a list of corrections for common molecules and functional groups. Subsequently, we explain how the errors spread from simple reaction energy calculations to adsorption energies, scaling relations, equilibrium potentials, overpotentials, and Sabatier-type activity plots. Finally, we list the remaining challenges toward an improved assessment of energetics at solid–gas–liquid interfaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EES catalysis\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\" 157-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ey/d3ey00126a?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EES catalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ey/d3ey00126a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EES catalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ey/d3ey00126a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,基于密度泛函理论(DFT)的计算模型被广泛用于电催化反应的分析和增强催化剂的设计。由于这些模型的准确性取决于输入数据的质量,因此了解DFT的内在局限性对于改进计算预测至关重要。DFT的一个常见缺陷是估计分子的总能量,特别是那些含有双键和三键的分子。在这篇综述中,我们展示了气相误差如何渗透到电催化中习惯使用的热力学和动力学模型中,潜在地损害了它们的预测性。首先,我们说明了如何识别这些错误,并提供了常见分子和官能团的更正列表。随后,我们解释了误差是如何从简单的反应能计算扩展到吸附能、标度关系、平衡势、过电位和sabatier型活度图的。最后,我们列出了改进固气液界面能量学评估的剩余挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gas-phase errors in computational electrocatalysis: a review

Gas-phase errors in computational electrocatalysis: a review

Gas-phase errors in computational electrocatalysis: a review

Currently, computational models based on density functional theory (DFT) are intensively used for the analysis of electrocatalytic reactions and the design of enhanced catalysts. As the accuracy of these models is subjected to the quality of the input data, knowing the intrinsic limitations of DFT is crucial to improve computational predictions. A common pitfall of DFT is the estimation of the total energies of molecules, particularly those containing double and triple bonds. In this review, we show how gas-phase errors permeate thermodynamic and kinetic models of customary use in electrocatalysis, potentially compromising their predictiveness. First, we illustrate how these errors can be identified and provide a list of corrections for common molecules and functional groups. Subsequently, we explain how the errors spread from simple reaction energy calculations to adsorption energies, scaling relations, equilibrium potentials, overpotentials, and Sabatier-type activity plots. Finally, we list the remaining challenges toward an improved assessment of energetics at solid–gas–liquid interfaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信