学术自由问题:普遍权利还是相对术语

IF 0.4 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
William G. Tierney,Michael Lanford
{"title":"学术自由问题:普遍权利还是相对术语","authors":"William G. Tierney,Michael Lanford","doi":"10.1007/BF03396999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, we interrogate the role of academic freedom in the 21st century by describing its historical genesis in the modern university, its association with the concept of tenure, and how it is reinterpreted by different cultural and social contexts. Afterwards, we examine traditional infringements by national governments upon academic freedom, as well as new infringements brought on by the forces of globalization and commercialization. Since academic freedom not only protects scholarly inquiry, but the health and safety of academics across the world, we argue that academic freedom is a “transcendent value” that should be respected by political and institutional forces and carefully defended by engaged scholars.","PeriodicalId":45075,"journal":{"name":"中国教育学前沿","volume":"46 1","pages":"4-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Question of Academic Freedom: Universal Right or Relative Term\",\"authors\":\"William G. Tierney,Michael Lanford\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03396999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, we interrogate the role of academic freedom in the 21st century by describing its historical genesis in the modern university, its association with the concept of tenure, and how it is reinterpreted by different cultural and social contexts. Afterwards, we examine traditional infringements by national governments upon academic freedom, as well as new infringements brought on by the forces of globalization and commercialization. Since academic freedom not only protects scholarly inquiry, but the health and safety of academics across the world, we argue that academic freedom is a “transcendent value” that should be respected by political and institutional forces and carefully defended by engaged scholars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国教育学前沿\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"4-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国教育学前沿\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396999\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国教育学前沿","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们通过描述学术自由在现代大学中的历史起源,它与终身教职概念的联系,以及它如何在不同的文化和社会背景下被重新解释,来探讨学术自由在21世纪的作用。随后,我们考察了各国政府对学术自由的传统侵犯,以及全球化和商业化力量带来的新侵犯。由于学术自由不仅保护学术探究,而且保护世界各地学者的健康和安全,我们认为学术自由是一种“超越价值”,应该受到政治和制度力量的尊重,并由参与其中的学者认真捍卫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Question of Academic Freedom: Universal Right or Relative Term
In this essay, we interrogate the role of academic freedom in the 21st century by describing its historical genesis in the modern university, its association with the concept of tenure, and how it is reinterpreted by different cultural and social contexts. Afterwards, we examine traditional infringements by national governments upon academic freedom, as well as new infringements brought on by the forces of globalization and commercialization. Since academic freedom not only protects scholarly inquiry, but the health and safety of academics across the world, we argue that academic freedom is a “transcendent value” that should be respected by political and institutional forces and carefully defended by engaged scholars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国教育学前沿
中国教育学前沿 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
479
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Education in China is dedicated to illuminating the results of the newest educational research in China and providing an academic platform for international exchanges. We have carefully selected papers that have previously been published in Chinese universities and scholarly journals as well as academic essays that will be published for the first time. After an exhaustive peer review process, we hope to present these articles to a global audience. Through these papers, international scholars can have the opportunity to understand the current conditions of education in China as well as the research of Chinese academics. Our journal touches upon numerous branches of educational research and theory, as well as educational reform and practical pedagogy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信