在工作场所出柜:意大利和英国的比较研究

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Salvatore Monaco, Alfonso Pezzella
{"title":"在工作场所出柜:意大利和英国的比较研究","authors":"Salvatore Monaco, Alfonso Pezzella","doi":"10.1080/19359705.2022.2089428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><h2>Introduction </h2><p>The study aims to analyze the main characteristics and differences relating to the lived experiences of coming out in the workplace in two very different territorial contexts (Italy and England), looking at universities as a case study.</p><h2>Method </h2><p>30 sexual and gender minority university teachers (15 from Italy and 15 from England), ranging from 29 to 56 years of age (<i>M</i> = 41.66; <i>SD</i> = 10.13), were recruited in 2019 to participate in a qualitative research study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed in line with the assumptions of the six-step thematic analysis approach.</p><h2>Result </h2><p>The propensity to come out in the workplace is mainly affected by legislative safeguards. However, policies and the regulatory framework alone are not enough. Results suggested that the cultural context and the working climate have an equally significant impact.</p><h2>Conclusion </h2><p>The stigma toward LGBT + people cannot be eradicated overnight and changing cultural beliefs is a slow process that requires imaginative and creative methods to get students and the university community to interact with LGBT + people.</p><h2>Practical implications </h2><p>Stimulating a bottom-up change within individual institutions can represent a possible strategy to activate a process of change and social inclusion toward the LGBT + community with an echo on the wider environmental and cultural context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coming out in the workplace: A comparative study between Italy and England\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore Monaco, Alfonso Pezzella\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19359705.2022.2089428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><h2>Introduction </h2><p>The study aims to analyze the main characteristics and differences relating to the lived experiences of coming out in the workplace in two very different territorial contexts (Italy and England), looking at universities as a case study.</p><h2>Method </h2><p>30 sexual and gender minority university teachers (15 from Italy and 15 from England), ranging from 29 to 56 years of age (<i>M</i> = 41.66; <i>SD</i> = 10.13), were recruited in 2019 to participate in a qualitative research study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed in line with the assumptions of the six-step thematic analysis approach.</p><h2>Result </h2><p>The propensity to come out in the workplace is mainly affected by legislative safeguards. However, policies and the regulatory framework alone are not enough. Results suggested that the cultural context and the working climate have an equally significant impact.</p><h2>Conclusion </h2><p>The stigma toward LGBT + people cannot be eradicated overnight and changing cultural beliefs is a slow process that requires imaginative and creative methods to get students and the university community to interact with LGBT + people.</p><h2>Practical implications </h2><p>Stimulating a bottom-up change within individual institutions can represent a possible strategy to activate a process of change and social inclusion toward the LGBT + community with an echo on the wider environmental and cultural context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2022.2089428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2022.2089428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在分析在两个截然不同的地域背景下(意大利和英国),出柜生活经历的主要特征和差异,并以大学为例进行研究。方法30名性少数民族高校教师(意大利15名,英国15名),年龄29 ~ 56岁(M = 41.66;SD = 10.13),于2019年被招募参加一项定性研究。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并根据六步专题分析方法的假设进行分析。结果工作场所出柜倾向主要受法律保障措施的影响。然而,仅靠政策和监管框架是不够的。研究结果表明,文化背景和工作氛围对员工绩效的影响同样显著。对LGBT +人群的污名不可能在一夜之间消除,改变文化信仰是一个缓慢的过程,需要富有想象力和创造性的方法来让学生和大学社区与LGBT +人群互动。在个别机构内部激发自下而上的变革,可以作为一种可能的策略,在更广泛的环境和文化背景下,激活对LGBT +社区的变革和社会包容进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coming out in the workplace: A comparative study between Italy and England

Abstract

Introduction

The study aims to analyze the main characteristics and differences relating to the lived experiences of coming out in the workplace in two very different territorial contexts (Italy and England), looking at universities as a case study.

Method

30 sexual and gender minority university teachers (15 from Italy and 15 from England), ranging from 29 to 56 years of age (M = 41.66; SD = 10.13), were recruited in 2019 to participate in a qualitative research study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed in line with the assumptions of the six-step thematic analysis approach.

Result

The propensity to come out in the workplace is mainly affected by legislative safeguards. However, policies and the regulatory framework alone are not enough. Results suggested that the cultural context and the working climate have an equally significant impact.

Conclusion

The stigma toward LGBT + people cannot be eradicated overnight and changing cultural beliefs is a slow process that requires imaginative and creative methods to get students and the university community to interact with LGBT + people.

Practical implications

Stimulating a bottom-up change within individual institutions can represent a possible strategy to activate a process of change and social inclusion toward the LGBT + community with an echo on the wider environmental and cultural context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信