以正义为导向的反种族主义验证:在评估实践中继续破坏白人至上主义

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Assessment Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1080/10627197.2023.2285047

Jennifer Randall, Mya Poe, Maria Elena Oliveri, David Slomp

引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的验证方法不能解释压迫系统(例如种族主义、激进的民族主义)影响测试设计和开发过程的方式。为了打破白人的传统…

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Justice-Oriented, Antiracist Validation: Continuing to Disrupt White Supremacy in Assessment Practices

Traditional validation approaches fail to account for the ways oppressive systems (e.g. racism, radical nationalism) impact the test design and development process. To disrupt this legacy of white ...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.