测量印度皮革工业水污染物的技术效率和影子价格:一种定向距离函数方法

IF 1.4 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Aparajita Singh, Haripriya Gundimeda
{"title":"测量印度皮革工业水污染物的技术效率和影子价格:一种定向距离函数方法","authors":"Aparajita Singh, Haripriya Gundimeda","doi":"10.1007/s11149-020-09422-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper measures the cost of reducing pollution from the Kanpur leather industry which is a prime source of pollution in India’s largest river basin of Ganges. The study uses directional distance function approach to examine the efficiency of leather firms in abating two undesirable pollutants (total suspended solids and chromium) while expanding the desirable leather output, and provides robust estimates of the marginal abatement cost for different production and pollution abatement strategies. The study is based on the primary data collected for 61 firms in Kanpur leather cluster for the year 2016. The results show that leather firms are technically inefficient and incur high abatement cost under the existing command and control regulations. The least inefficient strategy is a balanced policy that allows firms to reduce pollution without compromising their goal of output expansion. The study finds that old, small and more pollution intensive firms can abate pollution at least cost under a market-based regime. The shadow price of pollutants estimated in this paper are useful tools in determining equilibrium discharge permit price for design of market-based instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regulatory Economics","volume":"21 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring technical efficiency and shadow price of water pollutants for the leather industry in India: a directional distance function approach\",\"authors\":\"Aparajita Singh, Haripriya Gundimeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11149-020-09422-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper measures the cost of reducing pollution from the Kanpur leather industry which is a prime source of pollution in India’s largest river basin of Ganges. The study uses directional distance function approach to examine the efficiency of leather firms in abating two undesirable pollutants (total suspended solids and chromium) while expanding the desirable leather output, and provides robust estimates of the marginal abatement cost for different production and pollution abatement strategies. The study is based on the primary data collected for 61 firms in Kanpur leather cluster for the year 2016. The results show that leather firms are technically inefficient and incur high abatement cost under the existing command and control regulations. The least inefficient strategy is a balanced policy that allows firms to reduce pollution without compromising their goal of output expansion. The study finds that old, small and more pollution intensive firms can abate pollution at least cost under a market-based regime. The shadow price of pollutants estimated in this paper are useful tools in determining equilibrium discharge permit price for design of market-based instruments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Regulatory Economics\",\"volume\":\"21 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Regulatory Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-020-09422-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regulatory Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-020-09422-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文测量了减少坎普尔皮革工业污染的成本,这是印度最大的恒河流域污染的主要来源。本研究使用定向距离函数方法来检验皮革企业在扩大理想皮革产量的同时减少两种不希望的污染物(总悬浮固体和铬)的效率,并提供了不同生产和污染减排策略的边际减排成本的稳健估计。该研究基于2016年坎普尔皮革集群61家公司收集的主要数据。结果表明,在现行的指挥控制制度下,皮革企业的技术效率低下,减排成本高。效率最低的策略是一种平衡的政策,它允许企业在不损害其产量扩张目标的情况下减少污染。研究发现,在市场机制下,老的、小的、污染密集的企业可以以最低的成本减少污染。本文所估算的污染物影子价格,为设计基于市场的排污工具提供了确定平衡排放许可价格的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring technical efficiency and shadow price of water pollutants for the leather industry in India: a directional distance function approach

This paper measures the cost of reducing pollution from the Kanpur leather industry which is a prime source of pollution in India’s largest river basin of Ganges. The study uses directional distance function approach to examine the efficiency of leather firms in abating two undesirable pollutants (total suspended solids and chromium) while expanding the desirable leather output, and provides robust estimates of the marginal abatement cost for different production and pollution abatement strategies. The study is based on the primary data collected for 61 firms in Kanpur leather cluster for the year 2016. The results show that leather firms are technically inefficient and incur high abatement cost under the existing command and control regulations. The least inefficient strategy is a balanced policy that allows firms to reduce pollution without compromising their goal of output expansion. The study finds that old, small and more pollution intensive firms can abate pollution at least cost under a market-based regime. The shadow price of pollutants estimated in this paper are useful tools in determining equilibrium discharge permit price for design of market-based instruments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Recent legislative and policy reforms have changed the nature of regulation. Partial deregulation has created a new dimension to regulatory problems, as the debate is extended to include diversification and new forms of regulation. The introduction of incentive-based rate schedules and ratemaking procedures, the integration of demand-side programs with planning for capitol expansion, and other developments, raise a host of theoretical and empirical questions. The Journal of Regulatory Economics serves as a high quality forum for the analysis of regulatory theories and institutions by developing the rigorous economics foundations of regulation. Both theoretical and applied works, including experimental research, are encouraged. Research in all aspects of regulation is of interest including traditional problems of natural monopoly, antitrust and competition policy, incentive regulation, deregulation, auction theory, new policy instruments, health and safety regulation, environmental regulation, insurance and financial regulation, hazardous and solid waste regulation, universal service obligation, and consumer product regulation. The JRE provides researchers, policy-makers, and institutions with current perspectives on the theory and practice of economics of regulation. While there are a number of journals and magazines that include the study of regulation, the JRE is unique in that it fills a gap in the market for a high quality journal dealing solely with the economics of regulation.Officially cited as: J Regul Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信