ERA5再分析对日降水量的改进估计

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
David A. Lavers, Hans Hersbach, Mark J. Rodwell, Adrian Simmons
{"title":"ERA5再分析对日降水量的改进估计","authors":"David A. Lavers,&nbsp;Hans Hersbach,&nbsp;Mark J. Rodwell,&nbsp;Adrian Simmons","doi":"10.1002/asl.1200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Precipitation is an essential climate variable and a fundamental part of the global water cycle. Given its importance to society, precipitation is often assessed in climate monitoring activities, such as in those led by the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S). To undertake these activities, C3S predominantly uses ERA5 reanalysis precipitation. Research has shown that short-range forecasts for precipitation made from this reanalysis can provide valuable estimates of the actual (observed) precipitation in extratropical regions but can be less useful in the tropics. While some of these limitations will be reduced with future reanalyses because of the latest advancements, there is potentially a more immediate way to improve the precipitation estimate. This is to use the precipitation modelled in the Four-Dimensional Variational (4D-Var) data assimilation window of the reanalysis, and it is the aim of this study to evaluate this approach. Using observed 24-h precipitation accumulations at 5637 stations from 2001 to 2020, results show that smaller root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors are generally found by using the ERA5 4D-Var precipitation. For example, for all available days from 2001 to 2020, 87.5% of stations have smaller RMSEs. These improvements are driven by reduced random errors in the 4D-Var precipitation because it is better constrained by observations, which are themselves sensitive to or influence precipitation. However, there are regions (e.g., Europe) where larger biases occur, and via the decomposition of the Stable Equitable Error in Probability Space score, this is shown to be because the 4D-Var precipitation has a wetter bias on ‘dry’ days than the standard ERA5 short-range forecasts. The findings also highlight that the 4D-Var precipitation does improve the discrimination of ‘heavy’ observed events. In conclusion, an improved ERA5 precipitation estimate is largely obtainable, and these results could prove useful for C3S activities and for future reanalyses, including ERA6.</p>","PeriodicalId":50734,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Science Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asl.1200","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved estimate of daily precipitation from the ERA5 reanalysis\",\"authors\":\"David A. Lavers,&nbsp;Hans Hersbach,&nbsp;Mark J. Rodwell,&nbsp;Adrian Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/asl.1200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Precipitation is an essential climate variable and a fundamental part of the global water cycle. Given its importance to society, precipitation is often assessed in climate monitoring activities, such as in those led by the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S). To undertake these activities, C3S predominantly uses ERA5 reanalysis precipitation. Research has shown that short-range forecasts for precipitation made from this reanalysis can provide valuable estimates of the actual (observed) precipitation in extratropical regions but can be less useful in the tropics. While some of these limitations will be reduced with future reanalyses because of the latest advancements, there is potentially a more immediate way to improve the precipitation estimate. This is to use the precipitation modelled in the Four-Dimensional Variational (4D-Var) data assimilation window of the reanalysis, and it is the aim of this study to evaluate this approach. Using observed 24-h precipitation accumulations at 5637 stations from 2001 to 2020, results show that smaller root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors are generally found by using the ERA5 4D-Var precipitation. For example, for all available days from 2001 to 2020, 87.5% of stations have smaller RMSEs. These improvements are driven by reduced random errors in the 4D-Var precipitation because it is better constrained by observations, which are themselves sensitive to or influence precipitation. However, there are regions (e.g., Europe) where larger biases occur, and via the decomposition of the Stable Equitable Error in Probability Space score, this is shown to be because the 4D-Var precipitation has a wetter bias on ‘dry’ days than the standard ERA5 short-range forecasts. The findings also highlight that the 4D-Var precipitation does improve the discrimination of ‘heavy’ observed events. In conclusion, an improved ERA5 precipitation estimate is largely obtainable, and these results could prove useful for C3S activities and for future reanalyses, including ERA6.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Science Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asl.1200\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Science Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.1200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.1200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

降水是一个重要的气候变量,也是全球水循环的基本组成部分。鉴于降水对社会的重要性,气候监测活动经常对降水进行评估,例如由哥白尼气候变化服务(C3S)领导的气候监测活动。为了进行这些活动,C3S主要使用ERA5再分析降水。研究表明,通过这种再分析作出的短期降水预报可以对温带地区的实际(观测到的)降水提供有价值的估计,但对热带地区的用处不大。虽然由于最新的进展,这些限制中的一些将在未来的重新分析中减少,但可能有一种更直接的方法来改进降水估计。这是在再分析的四维变分(4D-Var)数据同化窗口中使用降水模型,本研究的目的是对该方法进行评估。利用2001 ~ 2020年5637个台站的24h降水资料,结果表明:ERA5 4D-Var降水的均方根误差(rmse)和平均绝对误差较小;例如,在2001年至2020年的所有可用天数中,87.5%的台站的均方根误差较小。这些改进是由于减少了4D-Var降水中的随机误差,因为它更好地受到观测值的约束,而观测值本身对降水敏感或影响降水。然而,有些地区(如欧洲)发生较大的偏差,并且通过概率空间稳定公平误差得分的分解,这表明这是因为4D-Var降水在“干燥”日比标准ERA5短期预测具有更大的偏差。研究结果还强调,4D-Var降水确实改善了对观测到的“重”事件的区分。总之,改进的ERA5降水估计在很大程度上是可获得的,这些结果可能对C3S活动和未来的再分析有用,包括ERA6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An improved estimate of daily precipitation from the ERA5 reanalysis

An improved estimate of daily precipitation from the ERA5 reanalysis

An improved estimate of daily precipitation from the ERA5 reanalysis

Precipitation is an essential climate variable and a fundamental part of the global water cycle. Given its importance to society, precipitation is often assessed in climate monitoring activities, such as in those led by the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S). To undertake these activities, C3S predominantly uses ERA5 reanalysis precipitation. Research has shown that short-range forecasts for precipitation made from this reanalysis can provide valuable estimates of the actual (observed) precipitation in extratropical regions but can be less useful in the tropics. While some of these limitations will be reduced with future reanalyses because of the latest advancements, there is potentially a more immediate way to improve the precipitation estimate. This is to use the precipitation modelled in the Four-Dimensional Variational (4D-Var) data assimilation window of the reanalysis, and it is the aim of this study to evaluate this approach. Using observed 24-h precipitation accumulations at 5637 stations from 2001 to 2020, results show that smaller root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors are generally found by using the ERA5 4D-Var precipitation. For example, for all available days from 2001 to 2020, 87.5% of stations have smaller RMSEs. These improvements are driven by reduced random errors in the 4D-Var precipitation because it is better constrained by observations, which are themselves sensitive to or influence precipitation. However, there are regions (e.g., Europe) where larger biases occur, and via the decomposition of the Stable Equitable Error in Probability Space score, this is shown to be because the 4D-Var precipitation has a wetter bias on ‘dry’ days than the standard ERA5 short-range forecasts. The findings also highlight that the 4D-Var precipitation does improve the discrimination of ‘heavy’ observed events. In conclusion, an improved ERA5 precipitation estimate is largely obtainable, and these results could prove useful for C3S activities and for future reanalyses, including ERA6.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Science Letters
Atmospheric Science Letters METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Science Letters (ASL) is a wholly Open Access electronic journal. Its aim is to provide a fully peer reviewed publication route for new shorter contributions in the field of atmospheric and closely related sciences. Through its ability to publish shorter contributions more rapidly than conventional journals, ASL offers a framework that promotes new understanding and creates scientific debate - providing a platform for discussing scientific issues and techniques. We encourage the presentation of multi-disciplinary work and contributions that utilise ideas and techniques from parallel areas. We particularly welcome contributions that maximise the visualisation capabilities offered by a purely on-line journal. ASL welcomes papers in the fields of: Dynamical meteorology; Ocean-atmosphere systems; Climate change, variability and impacts; New or improved observations from instrumentation; Hydrometeorology; Numerical weather prediction; Data assimilation and ensemble forecasting; Physical processes of the atmosphere; Land surface-atmosphere systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信