关于“学习障碍患者一生中与沟通和吞咽相关的研究重点”的评论

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Anna Backhouse, Sophie Howells
{"title":"关于“学习障碍患者一生中与沟通和吞咽相关的研究重点”的评论","authors":"Anna Backhouse, Sophie Howells","doi":"10.1108/tldr-04-2022-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on the article by Chadd et al. The commentary sets out the key principles of good support and considers how the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists research priorities impact on the practice of a team of Speech and Language Therapists who support people with learning disabilities, including autistic people and those with complex needs who display behaviour described as challenging. The commentary considers how the research priorities fit within current policies and frameworks and reflects on areas that could be considered further.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This commentary provides a narrative account of the reflections of a team of Speech and Language Therapists on the impact that the research priorities have had on their work.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) team are all keen to be involved in research but identify barriers to this relating to time within their current roles and challenges in meaningfully involving people they support. The research priorities have provided a broad framework for them to use to consider areas for research, and the focus on measuring outcomes is welcome. The research priorities largely fit within the frameworks that support current social care practice; however, they are not written in a way that is accessible for most people with a learning disability, and some do not fully reflect the social model of disability. The wider involvement of people with lived experience may have led to different research priorities identified.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The commentary provides an account of the impact that the research priorities have had on a team of Speech and Language Therapists working within a social care setting. It encourages readers to consider the wider context for people with learning disabilities and the role SLT plays within the social model of support for improving quality of life.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on “Research priorities relating to communication and swallowing for individuals with learning disabilities across the lifespan”\",\"authors\":\"Anna Backhouse, Sophie Howells\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tldr-04-2022-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on the article by Chadd et al. The commentary sets out the key principles of good support and considers how the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists research priorities impact on the practice of a team of Speech and Language Therapists who support people with learning disabilities, including autistic people and those with complex needs who display behaviour described as challenging. The commentary considers how the research priorities fit within current policies and frameworks and reflects on areas that could be considered further.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This commentary provides a narrative account of the reflections of a team of Speech and Language Therapists on the impact that the research priorities have had on their work.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) team are all keen to be involved in research but identify barriers to this relating to time within their current roles and challenges in meaningfully involving people they support. The research priorities have provided a broad framework for them to use to consider areas for research, and the focus on measuring outcomes is welcome. The research priorities largely fit within the frameworks that support current social care practice; however, they are not written in a way that is accessible for most people with a learning disability, and some do not fully reflect the social model of disability. The wider involvement of people with lived experience may have led to different research priorities identified.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The commentary provides an account of the impact that the research priorities have had on a team of Speech and Language Therapists working within a social care setting. It encourages readers to consider the wider context for people with learning disabilities and the role SLT plays within the social model of support for improving quality of life.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":54179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tizard Learning Disability Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tizard Learning Disability Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-04-2022-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-04-2022-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是对Chadd等人的文章进行评论。该评论列出了良好支持的关键原则,并考虑了皇家言语和语言治疗师学院的研究重点如何影响言语和语言治疗师团队的实践,这些团队支持有学习障碍的人,包括自闭症患者和那些表现出具有挑战性行为的复杂需求的人。评注考虑了研究重点如何适应当前的政策和框架,并反映了可以进一步考虑的领域。设计/方法/方法这篇评论提供了一组言语和语言治疗师对研究重点对他们工作的影响的反思的叙述。言语和语言治疗(SLT)团队都渴望参与到研究中来,但他们发现,在他们目前的角色范围内,这与时间有关,并且在有意义地参与他们所支持的人方面存在挑战。研究重点为他们提供了一个广泛的框架来考虑研究领域,注重衡量成果是受欢迎的。研究重点在很大程度上符合支持当前社会护理实践的框架;然而,它们并不是以大多数有学习障碍的人可以理解的方式编写的,有些并没有充分反映残疾的社会模式。有生活经验的人更广泛的参与可能导致不同的研究重点确定。原创性/价值评论提供了研究重点对在社会护理环境中工作的言语和语言治疗师团队的影响的说明。它鼓励读者考虑学习障碍人士的更广泛背景,以及学习障碍在支持改善生活质量的社会模式中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commentary on “Research priorities relating to communication and swallowing for individuals with learning disabilities across the lifespan”

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on the article by Chadd et al. The commentary sets out the key principles of good support and considers how the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists research priorities impact on the practice of a team of Speech and Language Therapists who support people with learning disabilities, including autistic people and those with complex needs who display behaviour described as challenging. The commentary considers how the research priorities fit within current policies and frameworks and reflects on areas that could be considered further.

Design/methodology/approach

This commentary provides a narrative account of the reflections of a team of Speech and Language Therapists on the impact that the research priorities have had on their work.

Findings

The Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) team are all keen to be involved in research but identify barriers to this relating to time within their current roles and challenges in meaningfully involving people they support. The research priorities have provided a broad framework for them to use to consider areas for research, and the focus on measuring outcomes is welcome. The research priorities largely fit within the frameworks that support current social care practice; however, they are not written in a way that is accessible for most people with a learning disability, and some do not fully reflect the social model of disability. The wider involvement of people with lived experience may have led to different research priorities identified.

Originality/value

The commentary provides an account of the impact that the research priorities have had on a team of Speech and Language Therapists working within a social care setting. It encourages readers to consider the wider context for people with learning disabilities and the role SLT plays within the social model of support for improving quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信