第二语言学习策略量表:斯洛文尼亚高等教育背景下的测试、调整和验证

Manica Danko, Mitja Dečman
{"title":"第二语言学习策略量表:斯洛文尼亚高等教育背景下的测试、调整和验证","authors":"Manica Danko, Mitja Dečman","doi":"10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In administering the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) survey, our research focused on the use of second language learning strategies (SLLS) among higher education students, ascertaining what SLLS they use, the relationships between the strategies, and how the use of one group of SLLS can explain the use of other groups of strategies. This study examined the validity of the SILL (Oxford, 1990: 293-300) in a specific context by performing an exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses based on the survey response data of 225 students learning English at the Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. The results show that most of the fit indexes used to test Oxford’s SILL provide an unacceptable fit, so a modification is proposed on the basis of the results of a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The adapted strategy inventory model with validated fit is introduced and discussed. It shows that basic cognitive and metacognitive strategies explain 58% of the variance of social learning strategies. The results also show that certain SILL strategies are out-dated, possibly due to advancements in information technology and language learning. The implications of these findings are discussed in the light of future study areas of SILL and SLLS research.","PeriodicalId":501121,"journal":{"name":"ESP Today","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Strategy Inventory for Second Language Learning: Tested, Adapted, and Validated in the Slovenian Higher Education Context\",\"authors\":\"Manica Danko, Mitja Dečman\",\"doi\":\"10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.2.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In administering the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) survey, our research focused on the use of second language learning strategies (SLLS) among higher education students, ascertaining what SLLS they use, the relationships between the strategies, and how the use of one group of SLLS can explain the use of other groups of strategies. This study examined the validity of the SILL (Oxford, 1990: 293-300) in a specific context by performing an exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses based on the survey response data of 225 students learning English at the Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. The results show that most of the fit indexes used to test Oxford’s SILL provide an unacceptable fit, so a modification is proposed on the basis of the results of a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The adapted strategy inventory model with validated fit is introduced and discussed. It shows that basic cognitive and metacognitive strategies explain 58% of the variance of social learning strategies. The results also show that certain SILL strategies are out-dated, possibly due to advancements in information technology and language learning. The implications of these findings are discussed in the light of future study areas of SILL and SLLS research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESP Today\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESP Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.2.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESP Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在语言学习策略调查中,我们的研究重点是高等教育学生使用第二语言学习策略,确定他们使用的第二语言学习策略,策略之间的关系,以及一组语言学习策略的使用如何解释其他组策略的使用。本研究以斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那大学管理学院225名英语学习学生的调查反馈数据为基础,通过探索性和验证性因素分析,在特定情境下检验了SILL的有效性(Oxford, 1990: 293-300)。结果表明,大多数用于测试Oxford’s sstill的拟合指标都不能满足要求,因此,本文在验证性因子分析(confirmatory factor analysis, CFA)结果的基础上提出了一种修正方法。介绍并讨论了具有验证拟合的自适应策略库存模型。研究表明,基本认知策略和元认知策略解释了58%的社会学习策略差异。研究结果还表明,可能由于信息技术和语言学习的进步,某些外语学习策略已经过时了。这些发现的意义,讨论了未来的研究领域的语言学习和语言学习的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Strategy Inventory for Second Language Learning: Tested, Adapted, and Validated in the Slovenian Higher Education Context
In administering the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) survey, our research focused on the use of second language learning strategies (SLLS) among higher education students, ascertaining what SLLS they use, the relationships between the strategies, and how the use of one group of SLLS can explain the use of other groups of strategies. This study examined the validity of the SILL (Oxford, 1990: 293-300) in a specific context by performing an exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses based on the survey response data of 225 students learning English at the Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. The results show that most of the fit indexes used to test Oxford’s SILL provide an unacceptable fit, so a modification is proposed on the basis of the results of a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The adapted strategy inventory model with validated fit is introduced and discussed. It shows that basic cognitive and metacognitive strategies explain 58% of the variance of social learning strategies. The results also show that certain SILL strategies are out-dated, possibly due to advancements in information technology and language learning. The implications of these findings are discussed in the light of future study areas of SILL and SLLS research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信