Chidera O. Iloejesi, Shuo Zhang, Lauren E. Beckingham
求助PDF
{"title":"含水层性质对CO2捕获程度和时间的影响","authors":"Chidera O. Iloejesi, Shuo Zhang, Lauren E. Beckingham","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Geologic CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in porous saline aquifers is a promising approach to reducing atmospheric concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub>. Reactive transport simulations provide the opportunity to analyze which factors influence geochemical reactivity in the reservoir, understand those most important for promoting CO<sub>2</sub> trapping, and assess individual sites. Field-scale aquifer characterization is time and resource intensive such that here, reactive transport simulations are leveraged to enhance understanding of selected aquifer properties including porosity, permeability, depth of storage, and carbonate mineralogy on the overall CO<sub>2</sub> trapping potential to better select sites promoting geochemical reactivity for CO<sub>2</sub> trapping. There are different mechanisms for sequestrating CO<sub>2</sub>. Once injected, CO<sub>2</sub> will dissolve into the brine to create an acidic environment, resulting in the dissolution of pre-injection formation minerals. Released ions can reprecipitate as secondary minerals. The dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> and mineralized CO<sub>2</sub> are considered as a more secure form of CO<sub>2</sub> trapping in this study compared to the free supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>. Here, a framework leveraging a controlled set of field scale simulations is developed to facilitate rapid, optimized site selection. Simulations vary aquifer properties to understand the impact of each unique property on CO<sub>2</sub> trapping, tracking, and comparing the amount of supercritical, aqueous, and mineralized CO<sub>2</sub>. The rate at which the CO<sub>2</sub> injected into the aquifer is converted to aqueous or mineralized CO<sub>2</sub> is newly defined here as the sequestration efficiency and used to compare simulation results. The reservoir depth and fraction of carbonate minerals in the formation are shown to be more important factors than reservoir porosity and permeability in affecting CO<sub>2</sub> trapping. However, the impact of aquifer properties on the evolution of injected CO<sub>2</sub> depends on the stage of the sequestration project. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"780-796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of aquifer properties on the extent and timeline of CO2 trapping\",\"authors\":\"Chidera O. Iloejesi, Shuo Zhang, Lauren E. Beckingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ghg.2238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Geologic CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in porous saline aquifers is a promising approach to reducing atmospheric concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub>. Reactive transport simulations provide the opportunity to analyze which factors influence geochemical reactivity in the reservoir, understand those most important for promoting CO<sub>2</sub> trapping, and assess individual sites. Field-scale aquifer characterization is time and resource intensive such that here, reactive transport simulations are leveraged to enhance understanding of selected aquifer properties including porosity, permeability, depth of storage, and carbonate mineralogy on the overall CO<sub>2</sub> trapping potential to better select sites promoting geochemical reactivity for CO<sub>2</sub> trapping. There are different mechanisms for sequestrating CO<sub>2</sub>. Once injected, CO<sub>2</sub> will dissolve into the brine to create an acidic environment, resulting in the dissolution of pre-injection formation minerals. Released ions can reprecipitate as secondary minerals. The dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> and mineralized CO<sub>2</sub> are considered as a more secure form of CO<sub>2</sub> trapping in this study compared to the free supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>. Here, a framework leveraging a controlled set of field scale simulations is developed to facilitate rapid, optimized site selection. Simulations vary aquifer properties to understand the impact of each unique property on CO<sub>2</sub> trapping, tracking, and comparing the amount of supercritical, aqueous, and mineralized CO<sub>2</sub>. The rate at which the CO<sub>2</sub> injected into the aquifer is converted to aqueous or mineralized CO<sub>2</sub> is newly defined here as the sequestration efficiency and used to compare simulation results. The reservoir depth and fraction of carbonate minerals in the formation are shown to be more important factors than reservoir porosity and permeability in affecting CO<sub>2</sub> trapping. However, the impact of aquifer properties on the evolution of injected CO<sub>2</sub> depends on the stage of the sequestration project. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"780-796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2238\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用