多色流式细胞术中补偿珠的并排比较。

Q3 Medicine
Debajit Bhowmick, Sara K Lowe, Michelle L Ratliff
{"title":"多色流式细胞术中补偿珠的并排比较。","authors":"Debajit Bhowmick, Sara K Lowe, Michelle L Ratliff","doi":"10.4049/immunohorizons.2300066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compensation or unmixing is essential in analyzing multiparameter flow cytometry data. Errors in data correction, either by compensation or unmixing, can completely change the outcome or mislead the researchers. Owing to limited cell numbers, researchers often use synthetic beads to generate the required single stains for the necessary calculation. In this study, the capacity of synthetic beads to influence data correction is evaluated. Corrected data for human peripheral blood cells were generated using cell-based compensation from the same cells or bead-based compensation to identify differences between the methods. These data suggest that correction with beads on full-spectrum and conventional cytometers does not always follow the basic flow compensation/unmixing expectations and alters the data. Overall, the best approach for bead-based correction for an experiment is to evaluate which beads and fluorochromes are most accurately compensated/unmixed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94037,"journal":{"name":"ImmunoHorizons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10759156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Side-by-Side Comparison of Compensation Beads Used in Polychromatic Flow Cytometry.\",\"authors\":\"Debajit Bhowmick, Sara K Lowe, Michelle L Ratliff\",\"doi\":\"10.4049/immunohorizons.2300066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Compensation or unmixing is essential in analyzing multiparameter flow cytometry data. Errors in data correction, either by compensation or unmixing, can completely change the outcome or mislead the researchers. Owing to limited cell numbers, researchers often use synthetic beads to generate the required single stains for the necessary calculation. In this study, the capacity of synthetic beads to influence data correction is evaluated. Corrected data for human peripheral blood cells were generated using cell-based compensation from the same cells or bead-based compensation to identify differences between the methods. These data suggest that correction with beads on full-spectrum and conventional cytometers does not always follow the basic flow compensation/unmixing expectations and alters the data. Overall, the best approach for bead-based correction for an experiment is to evaluate which beads and fluorochromes are most accurately compensated/unmixed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ImmunoHorizons\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10759156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ImmunoHorizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4049/immunohorizons.2300066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ImmunoHorizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4049/immunohorizons.2300066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在分析多参数流式细胞术数据时,补偿或解混是必不可少的。数据修正中的错误,无论是通过补偿还是解混,都可能完全改变结果或误导研究人员。由于细胞数量有限,研究人员经常使用合成珠来生成所需的单一染色以进行必要的计算。在这项研究中,合成珠影响数据校正的能力进行了评估。使用基于相同细胞的补偿或基于头的补偿生成人类外周血细胞的校正数据,以确定方法之间的差异。这些数据表明,在全谱和传统的细胞仪上用珠校正并不总是遵循基本的流量补偿/分离预期,并改变了数据。总的来说,实验中基于珠子的校正的最佳方法是评估哪些珠子和荧光染料得到了最准确的补偿/未混合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Side-by-Side Comparison of Compensation Beads Used in Polychromatic Flow Cytometry.

Compensation or unmixing is essential in analyzing multiparameter flow cytometry data. Errors in data correction, either by compensation or unmixing, can completely change the outcome or mislead the researchers. Owing to limited cell numbers, researchers often use synthetic beads to generate the required single stains for the necessary calculation. In this study, the capacity of synthetic beads to influence data correction is evaluated. Corrected data for human peripheral blood cells were generated using cell-based compensation from the same cells or bead-based compensation to identify differences between the methods. These data suggest that correction with beads on full-spectrum and conventional cytometers does not always follow the basic flow compensation/unmixing expectations and alters the data. Overall, the best approach for bead-based correction for an experiment is to evaluate which beads and fluorochromes are most accurately compensated/unmixed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信