阅读能力成就差距:测量非不变性对学校类型的影响

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rohm, Theresa, Carstensen, Claus H., Fischer, Luise, Gnambs, Timo
{"title":"阅读能力成就差距:测量非不变性对学校类型的影响","authors":"Rohm, Theresa, Carstensen, Claus H., Fischer, Luise, Gnambs, Timo","doi":"10.1186/s40536-021-00116-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>After elementary school, students in Germany are separated into different school tracks (i.e., school types) with the aim of creating homogeneous student groups in secondary school. Consequently, the development of students’ reading achievement diverges across school types. Findings on this achievement gap have been criticized as depending on the quality of the administered measure. Therefore, the present study examined to what degree differential item functioning affects estimates of the achievement gap in reading competence.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Using data from the German National Educational Panel Study, reading competence was investigated across three timepoints during secondary school: in grades 5, 7, and 9 (<i>N</i> = 7276). First, using the invariance alignment method, measurement invariance across school types was tested. Then, multilevel structural equation models were used to examine whether a lack of measurement invariance between school types affected the results regarding reading development.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Our analyses revealed some measurement non-invariant items that did not alter the patterns of competence development found among school types in the longitudinal modeling approach. However, misleading conclusions about the development of reading competence in different school types emerged when the hierarchical data structure (i.e., students being nested in schools) was not taken into account.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>We assessed the relevance of measurement invariance and accounting for clustering in the context of longitudinal competence measurement. Even though differential item functioning between school types was found for each measurement occasion, taking these differences in item estimates into account did not alter the parallel pattern of reading competence development across German secondary school types. However, ignoring the clustered data structure of students being nested within schools led to an overestimation of the statistical significance of school type effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":37009,"journal":{"name":"Large-Scale Assessments in Education","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The achievement gap in reading competence: the effect of measurement non-invariance across school types\",\"authors\":\"Rohm, Theresa, Carstensen, Claus H., Fischer, Luise, Gnambs, Timo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40536-021-00116-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>After elementary school, students in Germany are separated into different school tracks (i.e., school types) with the aim of creating homogeneous student groups in secondary school. Consequently, the development of students’ reading achievement diverges across school types. Findings on this achievement gap have been criticized as depending on the quality of the administered measure. Therefore, the present study examined to what degree differential item functioning affects estimates of the achievement gap in reading competence.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Using data from the German National Educational Panel Study, reading competence was investigated across three timepoints during secondary school: in grades 5, 7, and 9 (<i>N</i> = 7276). First, using the invariance alignment method, measurement invariance across school types was tested. Then, multilevel structural equation models were used to examine whether a lack of measurement invariance between school types affected the results regarding reading development.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Our analyses revealed some measurement non-invariant items that did not alter the patterns of competence development found among school types in the longitudinal modeling approach. However, misleading conclusions about the development of reading competence in different school types emerged when the hierarchical data structure (i.e., students being nested in schools) was not taken into account.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>We assessed the relevance of measurement invariance and accounting for clustering in the context of longitudinal competence measurement. Even though differential item functioning between school types was found for each measurement occasion, taking these differences in item estimates into account did not alter the parallel pattern of reading competence development across German secondary school types. However, ignoring the clustered data structure of students being nested within schools led to an overestimation of the statistical significance of school type effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Large-Scale Assessments in Education\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Large-Scale Assessments in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00116-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Large-Scale Assessments in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00116-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

小学毕业后,德国的学生被分成不同的学校轨道(即学校类型),目的是在中学建立同质的学生群体。因此,学生阅读成绩的发展在不同学校类型之间存在差异。关于这一成就差距的调查结果被批评为取决于所管理措施的质量。因此,本研究考察了不同项目功能在多大程度上影响阅读能力成就差距的估计。方法使用来自德国国家教育小组研究的数据,在中学期间的三个时间点(5年级、7年级和9年级)调查阅读能力(N = 7276)。首先,采用不变性对齐方法,检验了不同学校类型间的测量不变性。然后,采用多层结构方程模型来检验学校类型之间缺乏测量不变性是否影响阅读发展的结果。结果在纵向建模方法中,我们的分析揭示了一些不改变学校类型之间能力发展模式的测量非不变项。然而,当不考虑分层数据结构(即学生嵌套在学校)时,关于不同学校类型阅读能力发展的误导性结论就出现了。结论我们评估了纵向能力测量中测量不变性和聚类会计的相关性。尽管在每个测量场合中发现不同学校类型的项目功能不同,但考虑到这些项目估计的差异并没有改变德国中学类型阅读能力发展的平行模式。然而,忽略学生在学校内嵌套的聚类数据结构会导致高估学校类型效应的统计显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The achievement gap in reading competence: the effect of measurement non-invariance across school types

Background

After elementary school, students in Germany are separated into different school tracks (i.e., school types) with the aim of creating homogeneous student groups in secondary school. Consequently, the development of students’ reading achievement diverges across school types. Findings on this achievement gap have been criticized as depending on the quality of the administered measure. Therefore, the present study examined to what degree differential item functioning affects estimates of the achievement gap in reading competence.

Methods

Using data from the German National Educational Panel Study, reading competence was investigated across three timepoints during secondary school: in grades 5, 7, and 9 (N = 7276). First, using the invariance alignment method, measurement invariance across school types was tested. Then, multilevel structural equation models were used to examine whether a lack of measurement invariance between school types affected the results regarding reading development.

Results

Our analyses revealed some measurement non-invariant items that did not alter the patterns of competence development found among school types in the longitudinal modeling approach. However, misleading conclusions about the development of reading competence in different school types emerged when the hierarchical data structure (i.e., students being nested in schools) was not taken into account.

Conclusions

We assessed the relevance of measurement invariance and accounting for clustering in the context of longitudinal competence measurement. Even though differential item functioning between school types was found for each measurement occasion, taking these differences in item estimates into account did not alter the parallel pattern of reading competence development across German secondary school types. However, ignoring the clustered data structure of students being nested within schools led to an overestimation of the statistical significance of school type effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Large-Scale Assessments in Education
Large-Scale Assessments in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信