压力测试和情景分析中模型风险的量化

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Jimmy Skoglund
{"title":"压力测试和情景分析中模型风险的量化","authors":"Jimmy Skoglund","doi":"10.21314/jrmv.2019.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding and quantifying the model risk inherent in loss projection models used in the macroeconomic stress testing and impairment estimation is of significant concern for both banks and regulators. The application of relative entropy techniques allow model misspecification robustness to be numerically quantified using exponential tilting towards an alternative probability law. Using a particular loss forecasting model we quantify the model worst-case loss term-structures to yield insight into the behavior of the worst-case. The worst-case obtained represents in general an upward scaling of the term-structure consistent with the exponential tilting adjustment. The relative entropy approach to model risk we use has its foundation in economics with robust forecasting analysis and has recently started to be applied in risk management. The technique can complement the traditional model risk quantification techniques where a specific direction or range of model misspecification reasons are usually considered, such as, model sensitivity analysis, model parameter uncertainty analysis, competing models, and, conservative model assumptions.","PeriodicalId":43447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Model Validation","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of model risk in stress testing and scenario analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jimmy Skoglund\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/jrmv.2019.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding and quantifying the model risk inherent in loss projection models used in the macroeconomic stress testing and impairment estimation is of significant concern for both banks and regulators. The application of relative entropy techniques allow model misspecification robustness to be numerically quantified using exponential tilting towards an alternative probability law. Using a particular loss forecasting model we quantify the model worst-case loss term-structures to yield insight into the behavior of the worst-case. The worst-case obtained represents in general an upward scaling of the term-structure consistent with the exponential tilting adjustment. The relative entropy approach to model risk we use has its foundation in economics with robust forecasting analysis and has recently started to be applied in risk management. The technique can complement the traditional model risk quantification techniques where a specific direction or range of model misspecification reasons are usually considered, such as, model sensitivity analysis, model parameter uncertainty analysis, competing models, and, conservative model assumptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Risk Model Validation\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Risk Model Validation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/jrmv.2019.201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Model Validation","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/jrmv.2019.201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理解和量化宏观经济压力测试和减值估计中使用的损失预测模型中固有的模型风险是银行和监管机构都非常关注的问题。相对熵技术的应用允许模型错配鲁棒性使用指数倾斜向替代概率律进行数值量化。利用一个特定的损失预测模型,我们量化了模型最坏情况下的损失期限结构,从而深入了解最坏情况下的行为。所得到的最坏情况通常表示与指数倾斜调整相一致的期限结构的向上缩放。我们所使用的风险模型的相对熵方法具有稳健的预测分析的经济学基础,最近开始应用于风险管理。该技术可以补充传统的模型风险量化技术,传统的模型风险量化技术通常考虑特定方向或范围的模型不规范原因,如模型敏感性分析、模型参数不确定性分析、竞争模型和保守模型假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantification of model risk in stress testing and scenario analysis
Understanding and quantifying the model risk inherent in loss projection models used in the macroeconomic stress testing and impairment estimation is of significant concern for both banks and regulators. The application of relative entropy techniques allow model misspecification robustness to be numerically quantified using exponential tilting towards an alternative probability law. Using a particular loss forecasting model we quantify the model worst-case loss term-structures to yield insight into the behavior of the worst-case. The worst-case obtained represents in general an upward scaling of the term-structure consistent with the exponential tilting adjustment. The relative entropy approach to model risk we use has its foundation in economics with robust forecasting analysis and has recently started to be applied in risk management. The technique can complement the traditional model risk quantification techniques where a specific direction or range of model misspecification reasons are usually considered, such as, model sensitivity analysis, model parameter uncertainty analysis, competing models, and, conservative model assumptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: As monetary institutions rely greatly on economic and financial models for a wide array of applications, model validation has become progressively inventive within the field of risk. The Journal of Risk Model Validation focuses on the implementation and validation of risk models, and aims to provide a greater understanding of key issues including the empirical evaluation of existing models, pitfalls in model validation and the development of new methods. We also publish papers on back-testing. Our main field of application is in credit risk modelling but we are happy to consider any issues of risk model validation for any financial asset class. The Journal of Risk Model Validation considers submissions in the form of research papers on topics including, but not limited to: Empirical model evaluation studies Backtesting studies Stress-testing studies New methods of model validation/backtesting/stress-testing Best practices in model development, deployment, production and maintenance Pitfalls in model validation techniques (all types of risk, forecasting, pricing and rating)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信