猫与野生动物的相互作用和人畜共患疾病风险:呼吁获得更多更好的社区科学数据

IF 4.3 2区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Mammal Review Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1111/mam.12332
Tamara Szentivanyi, Malik Oedin, Ricardo Rocha
{"title":"猫与野生动物的相互作用和人畜共患疾病风险:呼吁获得更多更好的社区科学数据","authors":"Tamara Szentivanyi,&nbsp;Malik Oedin,&nbsp;Ricardo Rocha","doi":"10.1111/mam.12332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to their close interaction with both wildlife and humans, free-ranging domestic animals are well-suited to act as conveyors of zoonotic pathogens. Yet, although cats <i>Felis catus</i> are major predators of bats and other groups of zoonotic concern (e.g., rodents and birds), mounting evidence suggests that their role in the emergence of zoonotic diseases may be unappreciated. Here, we use bat–cat information extracted from the popular iNaturalist platform as a case in point to illustrate the potential of community science and social media to expand our understanding of pet-wildlife interactions. Although observations of cats preying on bats were more prevalent in Europe and North America, evidence of such interactions was documented across different geographic regions, revealing a relatively high incidence of bat predation by cats and providing evidence of cat–bat interactions previously unreported in the scientific literature. The lack of surveillance focused on cats and other pets as bridging hosts for zoonotic spillover events is concerning, considering the recognised risks they pose. Community science is a relatively untapped source of information for pet-wildlife interactions of zoonotic relevance. It is crucial that we gain a better understanding of the interaction between free-ranging pets and wildlife to better understand their potential contribution to past and future disease outbreaks. Failing to do so not only jeopardises human health but also puts pets at risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":49893,"journal":{"name":"Mammal Review","volume":"54 2","pages":"93-104"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mam.12332","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cat–wildlife interactions and zoonotic disease risk: a call for more and better community science data\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Szentivanyi,&nbsp;Malik Oedin,&nbsp;Ricardo Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mam.12332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Due to their close interaction with both wildlife and humans, free-ranging domestic animals are well-suited to act as conveyors of zoonotic pathogens. Yet, although cats <i>Felis catus</i> are major predators of bats and other groups of zoonotic concern (e.g., rodents and birds), mounting evidence suggests that their role in the emergence of zoonotic diseases may be unappreciated. Here, we use bat–cat information extracted from the popular iNaturalist platform as a case in point to illustrate the potential of community science and social media to expand our understanding of pet-wildlife interactions. Although observations of cats preying on bats were more prevalent in Europe and North America, evidence of such interactions was documented across different geographic regions, revealing a relatively high incidence of bat predation by cats and providing evidence of cat–bat interactions previously unreported in the scientific literature. The lack of surveillance focused on cats and other pets as bridging hosts for zoonotic spillover events is concerning, considering the recognised risks they pose. Community science is a relatively untapped source of information for pet-wildlife interactions of zoonotic relevance. It is crucial that we gain a better understanding of the interaction between free-ranging pets and wildlife to better understand their potential contribution to past and future disease outbreaks. Failing to do so not only jeopardises human health but also puts pets at risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mammal Review\",\"volume\":\"54 2\",\"pages\":\"93-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mam.12332\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mammal Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12332\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammal Review","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于它们与野生动物和人类的密切互动,自由放养的家畜非常适合充当人畜共患病病原体的传送带。然而,尽管猫科动物是蝙蝠和其他人畜共患疾病(如啮齿动物和鸟类)的主要捕食者,但越来越多的证据表明,它们在人畜共患疾病出现中的作用可能未得到重视。在这里,我们使用从流行的iNaturalist平台提取的蝙蝠猫信息作为一个例子来说明社区科学和社交媒体在扩大我们对宠物-野生动物相互作用的理解方面的潜力。尽管观察到猫捕食蝙蝠在欧洲和北美更为普遍,但在不同的地理区域记录了这种相互作用的证据,揭示了猫捕食蝙蝠的相对较高的发生率,并提供了以前在科学文献中未报道的猫-蝙蝠相互作用的证据。考虑到猫和其他宠物构成的公认风险,缺乏对它们作为人畜共患病溢出事件的桥梁宿主的监测令人担忧。社区科学是一个相对未开发的信息来源,用于动物共患病相关的宠物-野生动物相互作用。至关重要的是,我们要更好地了解自由放养的宠物和野生动物之间的相互作用,以便更好地了解它们对过去和未来疾病爆发的潜在贡献。如果不这样做,不仅会危害人类健康,也会使宠物处于危险之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cat–wildlife interactions and zoonotic disease risk: a call for more and better community science data

Cat–wildlife interactions and zoonotic disease risk: a call for more and better community science data

Cat–wildlife interactions and zoonotic disease risk: a call for more and better community science data

Due to their close interaction with both wildlife and humans, free-ranging domestic animals are well-suited to act as conveyors of zoonotic pathogens. Yet, although cats Felis catus are major predators of bats and other groups of zoonotic concern (e.g., rodents and birds), mounting evidence suggests that their role in the emergence of zoonotic diseases may be unappreciated. Here, we use bat–cat information extracted from the popular iNaturalist platform as a case in point to illustrate the potential of community science and social media to expand our understanding of pet-wildlife interactions. Although observations of cats preying on bats were more prevalent in Europe and North America, evidence of such interactions was documented across different geographic regions, revealing a relatively high incidence of bat predation by cats and providing evidence of cat–bat interactions previously unreported in the scientific literature. The lack of surveillance focused on cats and other pets as bridging hosts for zoonotic spillover events is concerning, considering the recognised risks they pose. Community science is a relatively untapped source of information for pet-wildlife interactions of zoonotic relevance. It is crucial that we gain a better understanding of the interaction between free-ranging pets and wildlife to better understand their potential contribution to past and future disease outbreaks. Failing to do so not only jeopardises human health but also puts pets at risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mammal Review
Mammal Review 生物-动物学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mammal Review is the official scientific periodical of the Mammal Society, and covers all aspects of mammalian biology and ecology, including behavioural ecology, biogeography, conservation, ecology, ethology, evolution, genetics, human ecology, management, morphology, and taxonomy. We publish Reviews drawing together information from various sources in the public domain for a new synthesis or analysis of mammalian biology; Predictive Reviews using quantitative models to provide insights into mammalian biology; Perspectives presenting original views on any aspect of mammalian biology; Comments in response to papers published in Mammal Review; and Short Communications describing new findings or methods in mammalian biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信